Suppr超能文献

高剂量地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较

Comparative Efficacy of High-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Methylprednisolone in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

作者信息

Kovacevic Pedja, Malic Jovana, Kovacevic Tijana, Dragic Sasa, Zlojutro Biljana, Jandric Milka, Momcicevic Danica, Cancarevic-Djajic Branka, Skrbic Ranko, Rizwan M Zeeshan

机构信息

Critical Care Medicine, Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, BIH.

Hospital-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, BIH.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 7;16(3):e55725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55725. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective (matched paired) clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone vs. methylprednisolone at equipotent (high) doses in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

A total of 347 patients with moderate and severe COVID-19-associated ARDS were administered either a high (equipotent) dose of dexamethasone (32 mg) or methylprednisolone (180 mg) for a duration of up to 10 days. All participants received the standard of care for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

The primary outcomes included length of stay in the ICU, ICU mortality, and discharge from the hospital.Based on the obtained results, a tendency towards more favorable clinical outcomes concerning the length of stay in the ICU (in the group of patients treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), p<0.05), ICU mortality, and discharge from the hospital (in the group of patients who were intubated, p<0.05) in patients receiving the high dose of dexamethasone compared to those receiving methylprednisolone was observed.

CONCLUSION

It appears that severe cases of COVID-19, especially intubated ones, treated with high doses of dexamethasone have a more favorable clinical outcome than the use of equipotent doses of methylprednisolone. However, larger multicenter studies are needed to validate our observations.

摘要

目的

这项回顾性(配对)临床试验旨在比较地塞米松与甲泼尼龙在等效(高)剂量下对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的疗效。

方法

共有347例中度和重度COVID-19相关ARDS患者接受了高(等效)剂量的地塞米松(32毫克)或甲泼尼龙(180毫克)治疗,持续时间长达10天。所有参与者均接受了重症COVID-19患者的标准治疗。

结果

主要结局包括在重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间、ICU死亡率和出院情况。根据获得的结果,观察到与接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者相比,接受高剂量地塞米松治疗的患者在ICU住院时间(在接受无创机械通气(NIV)治疗的患者组中,p<0.05)、ICU死亡率和出院情况(在插管患者组中,p<0.05)方面有更有利的临床结局趋势。

结论

似乎与使用等效剂量的甲泼尼龙相比,高剂量地塞米松治疗的COVID-19重症病例,尤其是插管患者,临床结局更有利。然而,需要更大规模的多中心研究来验证我们的观察结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/975d/10998658/315c959a33d4/cureus-0016-00000055725-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验