Kovacevic Pedja, Malic Jovana, Kovacevic Tijana, Dragic Sasa, Zlojutro Biljana, Jandric Milka, Momcicevic Danica, Cancarevic-Djajic Branka, Skrbic Ranko, Rizwan M Zeeshan
Critical Care Medicine, Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, BIH.
Hospital-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, BIH.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 7;16(3):e55725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55725. eCollection 2024 Mar.
This retrospective (matched paired) clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone vs. methylprednisolone at equipotent (high) doses in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
A total of 347 patients with moderate and severe COVID-19-associated ARDS were administered either a high (equipotent) dose of dexamethasone (32 mg) or methylprednisolone (180 mg) for a duration of up to 10 days. All participants received the standard of care for critically ill COVID-19 patients.
The primary outcomes included length of stay in the ICU, ICU mortality, and discharge from the hospital.Based on the obtained results, a tendency towards more favorable clinical outcomes concerning the length of stay in the ICU (in the group of patients treated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), p<0.05), ICU mortality, and discharge from the hospital (in the group of patients who were intubated, p<0.05) in patients receiving the high dose of dexamethasone compared to those receiving methylprednisolone was observed.
It appears that severe cases of COVID-19, especially intubated ones, treated with high doses of dexamethasone have a more favorable clinical outcome than the use of equipotent doses of methylprednisolone. However, larger multicenter studies are needed to validate our observations.
这项回顾性(配对)临床试验旨在比较地塞米松与甲泼尼龙在等效(高)剂量下对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的疗效。
共有347例中度和重度COVID-19相关ARDS患者接受了高(等效)剂量的地塞米松(32毫克)或甲泼尼龙(180毫克)治疗,持续时间长达10天。所有参与者均接受了重症COVID-19患者的标准治疗。
主要结局包括在重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间、ICU死亡率和出院情况。根据获得的结果,观察到与接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者相比,接受高剂量地塞米松治疗的患者在ICU住院时间(在接受无创机械通气(NIV)治疗的患者组中,p<0.05)、ICU死亡率和出院情况(在插管患者组中,p<0.05)方面有更有利的临床结局趋势。
似乎与使用等效剂量的甲泼尼龙相比,高剂量地塞米松治疗的COVID-19重症病例,尤其是插管患者,临床结局更有利。然而,需要更大规模的多中心研究来验证我们的观察结果。