• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高疼痛医学的能力和安全性:一种结合模拟和床边教学的实用临床教学策略,适用于学生。

Improving competence and safety in pain medicine: a practical clinical teaching strategy for students combining simulation and bedside teaching.

机构信息

University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02554-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-021-02554-6
PMID:33632210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7905916/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain is a devastating sensation and has to be treated immediately. Therefore, we developed a training program to improve the knowledge of medical students in the field of pain medicine. In the present study, the applicability and efficacy of this training program was tested.

METHODS

Half of the students attended first a training with simulated patients (SP) followed by bedside teaching (Group 1). Group 2 performed the training programs in reverse order. The evaluation based on standardized questionnaires completed by students (self-assessment) and all students took part in two practical examinations after the learning interventions.

RESULTS

This study included 35 students. The quality of the simulation was evaluated by the students with average grade 1.1 (1 = very good, 6 = very bad). The practical work on the ward with patients was rated with grade 1.4 of 6, the whole course with 1.1. Students of Group A were significantly better in the final examination (grade 1.7 vs. grade 2.2, p < 0.05). To rate the improvement of skills (self-assessment) we used a Likert Scale (1 = very certain, 5 = very uncertain). The following skills were similar in both groups and significantly better after the course: taking responsibility, expert knowledge, empathy, relationship building and communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Training with simulated patients in combination with small-group teaching at the bedside with real patients achieves a dramatic increase in student competence. Students prefer learning from the simulation before bedside teaching and propose to include simulation into the curricular teaching of pain medicine.

摘要

背景

疼痛是一种毁灭性的感觉,必须立即治疗。因此,我们开发了一个培训计划,以提高医学生在疼痛医学领域的知识。在本研究中,测试了该培训计划的适用性和效果。

方法

一半的学生首先参加了一个模拟患者(SP)培训,然后进行床边教学(第 1 组)。第 2 组以相反的顺序进行培训计划。学生通过标准化问卷完成的评估(自我评估)以及所有学生在学习干预后参加了两次实践考试。

结果

这项研究包括 35 名学生。学生对模拟的质量评价为平均 1.1 分(1=非常好,6=非常差)。在病房与患者一起进行的实际工作得分为 6 分中的 1.4 分,整个课程得分为 1.1。第 1 组的学生在期末考试中成绩明显更好(等级 1.7 与等级 2.2,p<0.05)。为了评估技能的提高(自我评估),我们使用了李克特量表(1=非常确定,5=非常不确定)。以下技能在两组中相似,并且在课程后显著提高:承担责任、专业知识、同理心、建立关系和沟通。

结论

在床边与真实患者一起进行模拟患者培训与小组教学相结合,可以显著提高学生的能力。学生更喜欢在床边教学之前从模拟中学习,并建议将模拟纳入疼痛医学的课程教学中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f4/7905916/7dad4bacc93a/12909_2021_2554_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f4/7905916/91d9674335a9/12909_2021_2554_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f4/7905916/7dad4bacc93a/12909_2021_2554_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f4/7905916/91d9674335a9/12909_2021_2554_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0f4/7905916/7dad4bacc93a/12909_2021_2554_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving competence and safety in pain medicine: a practical clinical teaching strategy for students combining simulation and bedside teaching.提高疼痛医学的能力和安全性:一种结合模拟和床边教学的实用临床教学策略,适用于学生。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02554-6.
2
Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?医学生对虚拟病人会做出共情反应吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.021.
3
[Intensive care medicine as a component of the compulsory medical curriculum. Evaluation of a pilot curriculum at the University Hospital Aachen].[重症医学作为医学必修课程的一部分。亚琛大学医院试点课程评估]
Anaesthesist. 2009 Mar;58(3):273-9, 282-4. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1501-0.
4
Student perceptions of a video-based blended learning approach for improving pediatric physical examination skills.学生对基于视频的混合式学习方法提高儿科体格检查技能的看法。
Ann Anat. 2016 Nov;208:179-182. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
5
Implementation of the interdisciplinary curriculum Teaching and Assessing Communicative Competence in the fourth academic year of medical studies (CoMeD).医学学习第四学年跨学科课程“教学与评估沟通能力”(CoMeD)的实施情况。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2012;29(1):Doc06. doi: 10.3205/zma000776. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
6
[Mentoring and workplace-based assessments for final year medical students : An effective way to increase satisfaction and competence?].[针对医学专业最后一年学生的指导与基于工作场所的评估:提高满意度和能力的有效途径?]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Jun;70(6):486-496. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00902-7. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
7
The communication skills course for second year medical students at Hannover Medical School: An evaluation study based on students' self-assessments.汉诺威医学院针对二年级医学生开设的沟通技巧课程:一项基于学生自我评估的评估研究。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2011;28(4):Doc54. doi: 10.3205/zma000766. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
8
Examiner and simulated patient ratings of empathy in medical student final year clinical examination: are they useful?医学生毕业临床考试中检查者与模拟患者对共情能力的评分:这些评分有用吗?
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 22;14:199. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-199.
9
Student self-reported communication skills, knowledge and confidence across standardised patient, virtual and traditional clinical learning environments.学生在标准化病人、虚拟和传统临床学习环境中自我报告的沟通技巧、知识和信心。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 27;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0577-5.
10
Teaching medical students to express empathy by exploring patient emotions and experiences in standardized medical encounters.在标准化医疗接触中探索患者的情绪和体验,教导医学生表达同理心。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Sep;100(9):1694-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Pain Medicine Curriculum Framework-structured integration of pain medicine education into the medical curriculum.疼痛医学课程框架——将疼痛医学教育结构化整合到医学课程中。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;3:1057114. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1057114. eCollection 2022.
2
[The cross-sectional field "pain medicine" in medical studies at the University of Leipzig-What has been achieved? : An analysis of self-estimation of students before, during and 5 years after establishment of the cross-sectional field].[莱比锡大学医学研究中的“疼痛医学”横断面领域——取得了哪些成果?:对该横断面领域设立前、设立期间及设立5年后学生自我评估的分析]
Schmerz. 2022 Dec;36(6):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00482-022-00665-7. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Simulation-based training for pain assessment in the emergency department.急诊科基于模拟的疼痛评估培训。
Med Educ. 2019 Nov;53(11):1149-1150. doi: 10.1111/medu.13975.
2
Simulation-Based Education and Team Training.基于模拟的教育与团队培训。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Dec;52(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
3
Difficult Conversations: Training Medical Students to Assess, Educate, and Treat the Patient with Chronic Pain.艰难的对话:培训医学生评估、教育和治疗慢性疼痛患者。
[Testing of practical surgical teaching at a distance-Experiences with a hybrid OSCE in surgery].
[远程实践外科教学测试——外科混合客观结构化临床考试的经验]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Oct;93(10):976-982. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01650-7. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
[Use of Video Online Seminars During Clinical Phase of Medical Study from the Perspective of Teachers and Students].[从师生视角看医学研究临床阶段在线视频研讨会的应用]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Feb;85(2):119-122. doi: 10.1055/a-1757-9379. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
5
Enhanced learning strategies of undergraduate medical students with a structured case presentation format.采用结构化病例展示形式提高本科医学生的学习策略
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Nov 30;10:424. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_221_21. eCollection 2021.
6
[German national survey of lecturers in ophthalmology on student teaching in the 2020/21 corona pandemic].[2020/21 新冠疫情期间德国眼科讲师关于学生教学的全国性调查]
Ophthalmologie. 2022 Jun;119(6):611-618. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01544-9. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
Acad Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;43(5):494-498. doi: 10.1007/s40596-019-01072-4. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
4
Advancing Simulation-Based Education in Pain Medicine.推进基于模拟的疼痛医学教育。
Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1725-1736. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx344.
5
[Digital learning and teaching in medical education : Already there or still at the beginning?].[医学教育中的数字学习与教学:已然存在还是仍处于起步阶段?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Feb;61(2):201-209. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2673-z.
6
Does quantity ensure quality? Standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties.数量能确保质量吗?用于不同医学院校实践技能结果导向评估的标准化客观结构化临床考试站点。
Ann Anat. 2017 Jul;212:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
[Cross-sectional field pain medicine Q14 - the Mainz model : Development of the pain medicine curriculum in the standard study course at the University Medical School of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz].[横断面领域疼痛医学问题14 - 美因茨模式:美因茨约翰内斯古腾堡大学医学院标准学习课程中疼痛医学课程的开发]
Schmerz. 2017 Oct;31(5):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s00482-017-0210-5.
8
[Simulation-based training and OR apprenticeship for medical students : A prospective, randomized, single-blind study of clinical skills].医学生基于模拟的培训和手术室学徒制:一项关于临床技能的前瞻性、随机、单盲研究
Anaesthesist. 2016 Nov;65(11):822-831. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0221-0. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
9
Revisiting 'A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009'.重温《基于模拟的医学教育研究批判性综述:2003 - 2009》
Med Educ. 2016 Oct;50(10):986-91. doi: 10.1111/medu.12795.
10
A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review.基于系统文献综述的医疗保健教育中虚拟患者描述的定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 May 13;16:146. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0655-8.