Kurz Sandra, Vieth Thomas, Stieglitz Verena, Buggenhagen Holger
Rudolf Frey Lernklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Rudolf Frey Lernklinik, Mainz, Germany.
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Feb;85(2):119-122. doi: 10.1055/a-1757-9379. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
The aim of this study was to investigate the opportunities and challenges of using video online seminars (VOS) in the clinical phase of medical studies from the perspective of teachers and students.
Teachers and medical students from the 5th to the 10th semester completed questionnaires about their attitudes towards and experiences with VOS. Recommended procedures for VOS were derived from the results.
A total of 19 teachers and 108 students participated in this study; 67% of students found VOS helpful in the clinical phase of the degree course. Cognitive learning objectives (91% agreement) should be taught more often in the VOS format than affective learning objectives (71% agreement). However, 83% stated that VOS did not prepare them for future practical activities. Teachers indicated that cognitive (77% agreement) could be significantly better communicated than affective learning objectives (only 27% agreement). For two-thirds of the teachers, support or trainings were important. Good technical conditions were important for both groups.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the option of individual learning regardless of location to be an advantage of VOS. A teaching format is considered to be particularly useful if successful interaction between teacher and student takes place. In the context of blended learning concepts with preceding lectures and subsequent practical exercises, the learning success of VOS is greatest. Cognitive and some affective learning objectives can be achieved by this method. VOS can prepare for practical exercises, but they are not suitable in medical education for comprehensive teaching of practical learning objectives.
本研究旨在从教师和学生的角度调查在医学研究临床阶段使用在线视频研讨会(VOS)的机遇与挑战。
来自第五至第十学期的教师和医学生完成了关于他们对VOS的态度和体验的问卷。根据结果得出了VOS的推荐程序。
共有19名教师和108名学生参与了本研究;67%的学生发现在学位课程的临床阶段VOS很有帮助。认知学习目标(91%的人认同)应以VOS形式授课的频率应高于情感学习目标(71%的人认同)。然而,83%的人表示VOS没有让他们为未来的实践活动做好准备。教师表示,认知目标(77%的人认同)的传达效果明显优于情感学习目标(只有27%的人认同)。对于三分之二的教师来说,支持或培训很重要。良好的技术条件对两组都很重要。
讨论/结论:该研究表明,VOS的一个优势是可以实现不受地点限制的个性化学习。如果师生之间能成功互动,那么一种教学形式就会被认为特别有用。在结合了前期讲座和后续实践练习的混合学习概念背景下,VOS的学习效果最佳。通过这种方法可以实现认知和一些情感学习目标。VOS可以为实践练习做准备,但在医学教育中,它们并不适合全面教授实践学习目标。