Cardiology Division, SS.ma Annunziata Hospital, Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Cento, Ferrara.
Cardiology Division, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Apr 1;22(4):237-245. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001044.
The current narrative review provides an update of available knowledge on venous access techniques for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, with a focus on axillary vein puncture. Lower procedure-related and lead-related complications have been reported with extrathoracic vein puncture techniques compared with intrathoracic accesses. In particular, extrathoracic lead access through the axillary vein seems to be associated with lower complication incidence than subclavian vein puncture and higher success rate than cephalic vein cutdown. In literature, many techniques have been described for axillary vein access. The use of contrast venography-guided puncture has facilitated the diffusion of the axillary vein approach for device implantation. Venography may be particularly useful in specific demographic and clinical device implantation contexts. Ultrasound-guided or microwire-guided vascular access for lead positioning can be considered a valid alternative to venography, although current applications for axillary vein puncture need further evaluations.
目前的叙述性综述提供了关于心脏植入式电子设备植入术的静脉入路技术的最新知识,重点介绍腋静脉穿刺。与经胸入路相比,经胸外静脉穿刺技术与较低的手术相关和导线相关并发症相关。特别是,腋静脉经胸外导线接入似乎与较低的并发症发生率比锁骨下静脉穿刺和更高的成功率比头静脉切开术。在文献中,已经描述了许多腋静脉入路技术。对比静脉造影引导下穿刺术的使用促进了腋静脉入路在设备植入中的应用。静脉造影术在特定的人口统计学和临床设备植入环境中可能特别有用。超声引导或微丝引导的导线定位血管通路可以被认为是静脉造影术的有效替代方法,尽管目前腋静脉穿刺术的应用需要进一步评估。