• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瓦氏动作下超声引导腋静脉穿刺用于诊断及心血管介入目的的可行性:起搏器及心脏复律除颤器植入术

Feasibility of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Vein Puncture under Valsalva Maneuver for Diagnostic and Cardiovascular Interventional Purposes: Pacemaker and Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.

作者信息

Sassone Biagio, Bertagnin Enrico, Virzì Santo, Simeti Giuseppe, Tolomeo Paolo

机构信息

Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.

Cardiothoracic Vascular Department, Division of Provincial Cardiology, Santissima Annunziata Hospital and Delta Hospital, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Ferrara, 44042 Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 21;13(20):3274. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203274.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13203274
PMID:37892095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10606423/
Abstract

Although ultrasound-guided axillary vein access (USGAVA) has proven to be a highly effective and safe method for cardiac electronic implantable device (CIED) lead placement, the collapsibility of the axillary vein (AV) during tidal breathing can lead to narrowing or complete collapse, posing a challenge for successful vein puncture and cannulation. We investigated the potential of the Valsalva maneuver (Vm) as a facilitating technique for USGAVA in this context. Out of 148 patients undergoing CIED implantation via USGAVA, 41 were asked to perform the Vm, because they were considered unsuitable for venipuncture due to a narrower AV diameter, as assessed by ultrasound (2.7 ± 1.7 mm vs. 9.1 ± 3.3 mm, < 0.0001). Among them, 37 patients were able to perform the Vm correctly. Overall, the Vm resulted in an average increase in the AV diameter of 4.9 ± 3.4 mm ( < 0.001). USGAVA performed during the Vm was successful in 30 patients (81%), and no Vm-related complications were observed during the 30-day follow-up. In patients with unsuccessful USGAVA, the Vm resulted in a notably smaller increase in AV diameter (0.5 ± 0.3 mm vs. 6.0 ± 2.8 mm, < 0.0001) compared to patients who achieved successful USGAVA, while performing the Vm. Therefore, the Vm is a feasible maneuver to enhance AV diameter and the success rate of USGAVA in most patients undergoing CIED implantation while maintaining safety.

摘要

尽管超声引导下腋静脉穿刺置管术(USGAVA)已被证明是心脏电子植入式设备(CIED)导线置入的一种高效且安全的方法,但腋静脉(AV)在潮式呼吸期间的可塌陷性可导致其狭窄或完全塌陷,这给成功的静脉穿刺和置管带来了挑战。在此背景下,我们研究了瓦尔萨尔瓦动作(Vm)作为辅助USGAVA技术的潜力。在148例通过USGAVA进行CIED植入的患者中,41例被要求进行Vm,因为经超声评估,他们因AV直径较窄而被认为不适合静脉穿刺(2.7±1.7mm vs. 9.1±3.3mm,<0.0001)。其中,37例患者能够正确进行Vm。总体而言,Vm使AV直径平均增加了4.9±3.4mm(<0.001)。在Vm期间进行的USGAVA在30例患者中成功(81%),并且在30天随访期间未观察到与Vm相关的并发症。在USGAVA未成功的患者中,与USGAVA成功的患者相比,在进行Vm时,Vm使AV直径的增加明显更小(0.5±0.3mm vs. 6.0±2.8mm,<0.0001)。因此,Vm是一种可行的操作,可在大多数接受CIED植入的患者中增加AV直径和USGAVA的成功率,同时保持安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10606423/d23a230513b0/diagnostics-13-03274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10606423/5fd6e8a5340d/diagnostics-13-03274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10606423/8cf75e4f8dbf/diagnostics-13-03274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10606423/d23a230513b0/diagnostics-13-03274-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10606423/5fd6e8a5340d/diagnostics-13-03274-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10606423/8cf75e4f8dbf/diagnostics-13-03274-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b795/10606423/d23a230513b0/diagnostics-13-03274-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Vein Puncture under Valsalva Maneuver for Diagnostic and Cardiovascular Interventional Purposes: Pacemaker and Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.瓦氏动作下超声引导腋静脉穿刺用于诊断及心血管介入目的的可行性:起搏器及心脏复律除颤器植入术
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 21;13(20):3274. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13203274.
2
The Use of a Handheld Ultrasound Device to Guide the Axillary Vein Access during Pacemaker and Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation. A Feasibility Study.使用手持超声设备在起搏器和心脏复律除颤器植入过程中引导腋静脉穿刺:一项可行性研究
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 20;23(8):258. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2308258. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Body mass index is related to unsuccessful puncture attempts and failure to axillary vein cannulation during ultrasound-guided cardiac electronic device implantation.在超声引导下心脏电子设备植入过程中,体重指数与穿刺尝试失败及腋静脉插管失败相关。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;61(2):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00800-3. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture vs. cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac electronic device implantation: the ACCESS trial.经腋窝口袋内超声引导下静脉穿刺与头静脉切开术用于心脏电子设备植入术的比较:ACCESS 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Dec 7;44(46):4847-4858. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad629.
5
Ultrasound-Guided Venous Axillary Access Versus Standard Fluoroscopic Technique for Cardiac Lead Implantation: ZEROFLUOROAXI Randomized Trial.超声引导下腋静脉入路与常规透视技术在心脏导线植入中的比较:ZEROFLUOROAXI 随机试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Mar;10(3):554-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.11.020. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Ultrasound-guided access to the axillary vein for implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超声引导下经皮穿刺腋静脉植入心脏植入式电子设备:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Access. 2023 Jul;24(4):854-863. doi: 10.1177/11297298211054621. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
7
Axillary vein access for permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: Fluoroscopy compared to ultrasound.经腋静脉入路进行永久性心脏起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器植入:与透视相比,超声引导。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;43(6):566-572. doi: 10.1111/pace.13940. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Wireless Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Vein Cannulation for the Implantation of Cardiovascular Implantable Electric Devices.用于心血管植入式电子设备植入的无线超声引导腋静脉插管术
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):482-7. doi: 10.1111/jce.12917. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
Axillary vein puncture guided by ultrasound vs cephalic vein dissection in pacemaker and defibrillator implant: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.超声引导下腋静脉穿刺与头静脉切开在起搏器和除颤器植入中的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1554-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
10
Fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.荧光透视引导下腋静脉入路与头静脉入路在起搏器和除颤器植入中的比较:有效性和安全性的随机临床试验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Sep;30(9):1588-1593. doi: 10.1111/jce.14060. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of transcutaneous ultrasound-guided axillary vein access for implantations, revisions and upgrades of cardiac implantable electronic devices in a large tertiary care center.在一家大型三级医疗中心,经皮超声引导下腋静脉穿刺在心脏植入式电子设备植入、翻修和升级中的应用。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02692-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of a Handheld Ultrasound Device to Guide the Axillary Vein Access during Pacemaker and Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation. A Feasibility Study.使用手持超声设备在起搏器和心脏复律除颤器植入过程中引导腋静脉穿刺:一项可行性研究
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 20;23(8):258. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2308258. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Influence of arm position on the first pass success rates of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular axillary vein cannulation in spontaneously breathing patients: A randomised clinical trial.手臂位置对自主呼吸患者超声引导下锁骨下腋静脉置管首次穿刺成功率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Vasc Access. 2024 May;25(3):963-970. doi: 10.1177/11297298231152631. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Axillary vein access for antiarrhythmic cardiac device implantation: a literature review.
经腋静脉进行抗心律失常心脏装置植入:文献综述。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Apr 1;22(4):237-245. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001044.
4
Axillary vein puncture guided by ultrasound vs cephalic vein dissection in pacemaker and defibrillator implant: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.超声引导下腋静脉穿刺与头静脉切开在起搏器和除颤器植入中的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Sep;17(9):1554-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Arm position and collapsibility of infraclavicular axillary vein during voluntary breathing: An ultrasound-guided observational study.自主呼吸时锁骨下腋静脉的手臂位置及可塌陷性:一项超声引导下的观察性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Jan;21(1):39-44. doi: 10.1177/1129729819848918. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
6
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.胸廓出口综合征:病理生理学、诊断与治疗的全面综述
Pain Ther. 2019 Jun;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s40122-019-0124-2. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
7
Vein Management for Cardiac Device Implantation.心脏设备植入的静脉管理
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 Dec;10(4):561-571. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
8
Long-term reliability of the defibrillator lead inserted by the extrathoracic subclavian puncture.经胸外锁骨下穿刺置入的除颤电极导线的长期可靠性。
J Arrhythm. 2018 Aug 18;34(5):541-547. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12107. eCollection 2018 Oct.
9
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary/subclavian venous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation: a randomized study.超声引导下腋静脉/锁骨下静脉途径用于起搏器和除颤器导线植入的疗效:一项随机研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;51(2):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0313-7. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
10
Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian puncture and cephalic cutdown.静脉通路和长期起搏器导线故障:对比腋静脉穿刺与锁骨下穿刺和头静脉切开。
Europace. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):1193-1197. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw147.