• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复方药在心血管疾病中的价值:意大利多学科德尔菲共识小组的意见。

The value of the polypill in cardiovascular disease: an Italian multidisciplinary Delphi panel consensus.

机构信息

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples.

Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Apr 1;22(4):246-258. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001159.

DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001159
PMID:33633039
Abstract

The purpose of this work was to reach the consensus of a multidisciplinary and multistakeholder Italian panel on the value of polypill in cardiovascular disease, with respect to the clinical, technological, economic and organizational dimension. A three-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Eleven experts in the area of cardiology, pharmaceutical technology, general practice, hospital pharmacy, pharmacology, and health economics participated in the expert panel. To identify existing evidence concerning the value of polypill in the prevention of patients with cardiovascular disease, a systematic literature review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines. In the first round, 22 statements were distributed to the panel. Panel members were asked to mark 'agree' or 'disagree' for each statement and provide any comments. The same voting method was again used for the second round. In the first round nine statements met consensus. In the second round, 10 statements reached consensus. Overall, consensus was reached for 19 statements representing five value polypill domains: clinical, technological, economic and organizational. During a final web meeting with all panel members consensus document open points were discussed. Panel members agreed to recognize polypill as effective in reducing cardiovascular events, blood pressure and lipids, cardiovascular risk and the weight of therapy, in therapeutic adherence improvement, in the absence of differences in bioavailability between drugs administered in fixed or free combinations and the better cost-effectiveness profile compared with standard care. This document represents a knowledge framework to inform decision makers of the value of polypill in cardiovascular prevention.

摘要

这项工作的目的是在意大利,一个多学科和多利益相关者小组就多效药丸在心血管疾病方面的价值达成共识,涉及临床、技术、经济和组织层面。采用三步修正德尔菲法来达成共识。11 名心脏病学、药物技术、全科医学、医院药学、药理学和卫生经济学领域的专家参加了专家组。为了确定多效药丸在预防心血管疾病患者方面的价值的现有证据,根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目准则进行了系统文献回顾。在第一轮中,向专家组分发了 22 项声明。小组成员被要求对每个声明标记“同意”或“不同意”,并提供任何意见。第二轮也使用相同的投票方法。在第一轮中,有 9 项声明达成共识。在第二轮中,又有 10 项声明达成共识。总体而言,有 19 项声明代表五个多效药丸价值领域达成了共识:临床、技术、经济和组织。在与所有小组成员进行的最后一次网络会议上,讨论了共识文件的开放点。小组成员一致认为,多效药丸可有效降低心血管事件、血压和血脂、心血管风险和治疗负担,改善治疗依从性,固定或自由联合给药药物的生物利用度无差异,与标准护理相比具有更好的成本效益比。这份文件代表了一个知识框架,旨在为决策者提供多效药丸在心血管预防方面的价值信息。

相似文献

1
The value of the polypill in cardiovascular disease: an Italian multidisciplinary Delphi panel consensus.复方药在心血管疾病中的价值:意大利多学科德尔菲共识小组的意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Apr 1;22(4):246-258. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001159.
2
The polypill: An effective approach to increasing adherence and reducing cardiovascular event risk.复方制剂:提高依从性和降低心血管事件风险的有效方法。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Feb;24(3):297-310. doi: 10.1177/2047487316674817. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
3
Strengths and Limitations of Using the Polypill in Cardiovascular Prevention.使用复方制剂进行心血管疾病预防的优势与局限
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 May;19(5):45. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0853-y.
4
Impact of switching from different treatment regimens to a fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) in patients with cardiovascular disease or similarly high risk.心血管疾病患者或具有类似高风险的患者从不同治疗方案转换为固定剂量复方药丸(多效药丸)的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jun;24(9):951-961. doi: 10.1177/2047487317695616. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Improving cardiovascular protection: focus on a cardiovascular polypill.改善心血管保护:聚焦心血管复方制剂。
Future Cardiol. 2016 Mar;12(2):181-96. doi: 10.2217/fca.15.80. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a fixed dose combination (polypill) in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in India: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the UMPIRE trial.固定剂量复方制剂(复方药)在印度心血管疾病二级预防中的成本效益:UMPIRE 试验的试验内成本效益分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;262:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.082. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
The strong case for government funding of a polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in New Zealand.新西兰政府为心血管疾病二级预防提供复方药丸资金的有力理由。
N Z Med J. 2019 Sep 20;132(1502):77-83.
8
Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE): rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial of a cardiovascular preventive polypill-based strategy in India and Europe.多药复方药丸用于降低心血管事件(UMPIRE):印度和欧洲基于心血管预防多药丸策略的随机对照试验的原理与设计
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Feb;21(2):252-61. doi: 10.1177/2047487312463278. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
9
Reaching cardiovascular prevention guideline targets with a polypill-based approach: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.采用多效药丸治疗方案达到心血管预防指南目标:随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Heart. 2019 Jan;105(1):42-48. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313108. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Intermittent abdominal pressure ventilation management in neuromuscular diseases: a Delphi panel Consensus.神经肌肉疾病间歇性腹部压力通气管理:德尔菲小组共识。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2023 Jan-Jun;17(6):517-525. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2226391. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Approach to Patients with Obesity and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Primary Care Using the Delphi Methodology.采用德尔菲法对基层医疗中肥胖及其他心血管危险因素患者的诊疗方法
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 16;11(14):4130. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144130.