• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

固定剂量复方制剂(复方药)在印度心血管疾病二级预防中的成本效益:UMPIRE 试验的试验内成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of a fixed dose combination (polypill) in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in India: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the UMPIRE trial.

机构信息

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; Centre for Chronic Disease Control, India; Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

BresMed, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;262:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.082. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.082
PMID:29622506
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Use of Multidrug Pill In Reducing cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE) trial, showed that access to a cardiovascular polypill (aspirin, statin and two blood pressure lowering drugs) significantly improved adherence, lowered systolic blood pressure (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) in patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to analyze the within-trial cost-effectiveness of the polypill strategy versus usual care in India.

METHODS

Relative effectiveness and costs of polypill versus usual care groups in UMPIRE were estimated from the health sector perspective. Only direct medical costs were considered. The effectiveness of the polypill was reported as a percentage increase in adherence and mean reductions in SBP, and LDL-c, over the 15-month trial period. Healthcare resource utilization and costs were collected for each patient during the trial. Polypill price was constructed using a range of scenarios: $0.06-$0.94/day. The cost-effectiveness of the polypill was measured as the additional cost for 10% increase in adherence, and per unit reduction in SBP and LDL-c.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean cost per patient was significantly lower with the polypill strategy (-$203 per person, (95% CI: -286, -119, p < 0.01). In scenario analyses that varied polypill price assumptions, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for a polypill strategy ranged between cost-saving to $75 per 10% increase in adherence for polypill price of $0.94 per day.

CONCLUSIONS

The polypill strategy was cost-saving compared to usual care among patients with or at high risk of CVD in India.

摘要

背景

多药丸减少心血管事件试验(UMPIRE)表明,获得心血管复方药(阿司匹林、他汀类药物和两种降压药)可显著提高患者的服药依从性,降低心血管疾病(CVD)患者或高危患者的收缩压(SBP)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLc)。我们旨在分析印度人群中复方药策略相对于常规治疗的试验内成本效益。

方法

从卫生部门角度评估 UMPIRE 试验中复方药组与常规治疗组的相对效果和成本。仅考虑直接医疗成本。复方药的效果报告为依从性增加的百分比和 15 个月试验期间 SBP 和 LDL-c 的平均降低。在试验期间,为每位患者收集了医疗资源利用和成本。使用一系列情景构建了复方药的价格:$0.06-$0.94/天。通过依从性增加 10%的额外成本和 SBP 和 LDL-c 每单位降低来衡量复方药的成本效益。

结果

总体而言,复方药策略的每位患者平均成本显著降低(每人节省$203(95%CI:-286,-119,p<0.01))。在不同复方药价格假设的情景分析中,对于复方药价格为$0.94/天的情况,复方药策略的增量成本效益比在成本节约至每增加 10%的依从性节省$75 之间变化。

结论

与常规治疗相比,在印度有或高危 CVD 的患者中,复方药策略具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a fixed dose combination (polypill) in secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in India: Within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of the UMPIRE trial.固定剂量复方制剂(复方药)在印度心血管疾病二级预防中的成本效益:UMPIRE 试验的试验内成本效益分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;262:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.082. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
2
Use of a Multidrug Pill In Reducing cardiovascular Events (UMPIRE): rationale and design of a randomised controlled trial of a cardiovascular preventive polypill-based strategy in India and Europe.多药复方药丸用于降低心血管事件(UMPIRE):印度和欧洲基于心血管预防多药丸策略的随机对照试验的原理与设计
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Feb;21(2):252-61. doi: 10.1177/2047487312463278. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
3
Usefulness of a Cardiovascular Polypill in the Treatment of Secondary Prevention Patients in Spain: A Cost-effectiveness Study.心血管复方制剂在西班牙二级预防患者治疗中的效用:一项成本效益研究。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Jan;70(1):42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Impact of switching from different treatment regimens to a fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) in patients with cardiovascular disease or similarly high risk.心血管疾病患者或具有类似高风险的患者从不同治疗方案转换为固定剂量复方药丸(多效药丸)的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Jun;24(9):951-961. doi: 10.1177/2047487317695616. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Modeling the cost effectiveness and budgetary impact of Polypills for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the United States.在美国,用多效药丸对心血管疾病二级预防的成本效果和预算影响建模。
Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Estimated cardiovascular relative risk reduction from fixed-dose combination pill (polypill) treatment in a wide range of patients with a moderate risk of cardiovascular disease.固定剂量复方药丸(多效药丸)治疗对广泛的中度心血管疾病风险患者心血管相对风险降低的估计。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Aug;23(12):1289-97. doi: 10.1177/2047487315624523. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
7
Predicting the impact of polypill use in a metabolic syndrome population: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.预测多效药丸在代谢综合征人群中的使用效果:有效性和成本效益分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Apr;13(2):121-8. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0019-2.
8
Effects of a fixed-dose combination strategy on adherence and risk factors in patients with or at high risk of CVD: the UMPIRE randomized clinical trial.固定剂量联合策略对 CVD 患者或高危患者的依从性及相关风险因素的影响:UMPIRE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):918-29. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.277064.
9
Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication ('polypills') compared with usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease or at high risk: A prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six countries.固定剂量复方药物(“多效药丸”)与常规治疗相比对心血管疾病患者或高危患者的有效性:一项对六个国家3140例患者的前瞻性个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 15;205:147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
Process evaluation of the impact and acceptability of a polypill for prevention of cardiovascular disease.用于预防心血管疾病的复方制剂的影响及可接受性的过程评估
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 30;5(9):e008018. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008018.

引用本文的文献

1
Polypill Strategies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Older Adults: Evidence, Opportunities, and Implementation Challenges.老年人心血管疾病预防的多效药丸策略:证据、机遇与实施挑战
Drugs Aging. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01243-z.
2
Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: is it time for the polypill to be standard treatment?心血管疾病的二级预防:复方制剂成为标准治疗的时机到了吗?
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jul 12;55:101384. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101384. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Preventive Effects of a CVD Polypill on Developing Diabetes Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: Results of the PolyIran-Liver Trial.
代谢综合征患者服用 CVD 复方药对预防糖尿病的影响:PolyIran-Liver 试验结果。
Arch Iran Med. 2024 Oct 1;27(10):538-544. doi: 10.34172/aim.31839.
4
Barriers to adherence to secondary prevention therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease: a cross-sectional study of a Mexican reference center.缺血性心脏病患者二级预防治疗依从性的障碍:墨西哥一家参考中心的横断面研究
Arch Cardiol Mex. 2024 Sep 3;95(1):26-33. doi: 10.24875/ACM.24000034.
5
A Systematic Review of Economic Evidence of Cardiovascular Interventions in India.印度心血管干预措施的经济证据系统评价。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2024;20(6):e300724232473. doi: 10.2174/011573403X309363240730095253.
6
Polypill versus medication monotherapy in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Iran: An economic evaluation study.伊朗预防心血管疾病中多效药丸与单一药物治疗的比较:一项经济评估研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 5;7(7):e2240. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2240. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Premature Death, Underlying Reasons, and Preventive Experiences in Iran: A Narrative Review.伊朗的过早死亡、根本原因和预防经验:叙述性评论。
Arch Iran Med. 2023 Jul 1;26(7):403-410. doi: 10.34172/aim.2023.61.
8
Redefining the polypill: pros and cons in cardiovascular precision medicine.重新定义复方制剂:心血管精准医学中的利弊
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 19;14:1268119. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1268119. eCollection 2023.
9
Polypill Programs to Prevent Stroke and Cut Costs in Low Income Countries: Moving From Clinical Efficacy to Pragmatic Implementation.多效药丸计划预防中风并降低低收入国家的成本:从临床疗效走向实用实施。
Stroke. 2023 Feb;54(2):407-414. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039567. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
10
Cost-effectiveness of fixed-dose combination pill (Polypill) in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic literature review.固定剂量复方制剂(波利维)在心血管疾病一级和二级预防中的成本效益:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0271908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271908. eCollection 2022.