College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, China.
Chongqing Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing, 401147, China.
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 25;11(1):4635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84075-2.
To determine the risk state distribution, risk level, and risk evolution situation of agricultural non-point source pollution (AGNPS), we built an 'Input-Translate-Output' three-dimensional evaluation (ITO3dE) model that involved 12 factors under the support of GIS and analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of AGNPS risks from 2005 to 2015 in Chongqing by using GIS space matrix, kernel density analysis, and Getis-Ord Gi* analysis. Land use changes during the 10 years had a certain influence on the AGNPS risk. The risk values in 2005, 2010, and 2015 were in the ranges of 0.40-2.28, 0.41-2.57, and 0.41-2.28, respectively, with the main distribution regions being the western regions of Chongqing (Dazu, Jiangjin, etc.) and other counties such as Dianjiang, Liangping, Kaizhou, Wanzhou, and Zhongxian. The spatiotemporal transition matrix could well exhibit the risk transition situation, and the risks generally showed no changes over time. The proportions of 'no-risk no-change', 'low-risk no-change', and 'medium-risk no-change' were 10.86%, 33.42%, and 17.25%, respectively, accounting for 61.53% of the coverage area of Chongqing. The proportions of risk increase, risk decline, and risk fluctuation were 13.45%, 17.66%, and 7.36%, respectively. Kernel density analysis was suitable to explore high-risk gathering areas. The peak values of kernel density in the three periods were around 1110, suggesting that the maximum gathering degree of medium-risk pattern spots basically showed no changes, but the spatial positions of high-risk gathering areas somehow changed. Getis-Ord Gi* analysis was suitable to explore the relationships between hot and cold spots. Counties with high pollution risks were Yongchuan, Shapingba, Dianjiang, Liangping, northwestern Fengdu, and Zhongxian, while counties with low risks were Chengkou, Wuxi, Wushan, Pengshui, and Rongchang. High-value hot spot zones gradually dominated in the northeast of Chongqing, while low-value cold spot zones gradually dominated in the Midwest. Our results provide a scientific base for the development of strategies to prevent and control AGNPS in Chongqing.
为了确定农业非点源污染(AGNPS)的风险状态分布、风险水平和风险演变情况,我们在 GIS 的支持下构建了一个“输入-翻译-输出”三维评估(ITO3dE)模型,该模型涉及 12 个因素,并利用 GIS 空间矩阵、核密度分析和 Getis-Ord Gi分析,分析了 2005 年至 2015 年期间重庆 AGNPS 风险的时空演变特征。10 年间土地利用变化对 AGNPS 风险有一定影响。2005 年、2010 年和 2015 年的风险值分别在 0.40-2.28、0.41-2.57 和 0.41-2.28 范围内,主要分布区域为重庆西部(大足、江津等)和垫江县、梁平县、开州区、万州区、忠县等其他县。时空转移矩阵能够很好地展示风险转移情况,风险总体上随时间无明显变化。“无风险无变化”、“低风险无变化”和“中风险无变化”的比例分别为 10.86%、33.42%和 17.25%,占重庆总面积的 61.53%。风险增加、风险减少和风险波动的比例分别为 13.45%、17.66%和 7.36%。核密度分析适合于探索高风险聚集区。三个时期的核密度峰值均在 1110 左右,表明中风险模式点的最大聚集程度基本不变,但高风险聚集区的空间位置有所变化。Getis-Ord Gi分析适合于探索热点和冷点之间的关系。污染风险较高的县有永川区、沙坪坝区、垫江县、梁平县、西北丰都县和忠县,而污染风险较低的县有城口县、巫溪县、巫山县、彭水县和荣昌县。高值热点区逐渐在重庆东北部占主导地位,低值冷点区逐渐在中西部占主导地位。我们的研究结果为重庆制定农业非点源污染防治策略提供了科学依据。