Hernández Felipe A, Manqui Jonatan, Mejías Carlos, Acosta-Jamett Gerardo
Instituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Programa de Magíster en Ecología Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Feb 9;8:631788. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.631788. eCollection 2021.
Domestic dogs () often cohabite at interfaces shared by humans and wildlife, interacting with wild canids as predators, prey, competitors and reservoirs of several multi-host pathogens, such as canid-borne micro and macro parasites that could impact on wildlife, livestock and public health. However, spatio-temporal patterns of indirect interactions as promoters of pathogen transfer between domestic and wild canids are largely unknown. In this study, we used camera traps to describe the activity patterns and habitat use of dogs, chilla () and culpeo () foxes and identify the local-scale factors that may affect the frequency of dog-fox interactions through an anthropization gradient of the Coquimbo region, Chile. We assessed local-scale variables that may predict the number of interactions between dogs and foxes, and compared the time interval between dog-culpeo and dog-chilla interactions. Our findings suggested that closeness to urbanized zones predicts the frequency of indirect interactions between dogs and foxes. We found higher number of dog-fox interactions (60 interactions) at a periurban site adjacent to two coastal towns (Tongoy and Guanaqueros), compared to other two more undisturbed sites (12 interactions) increasingly distanced from urbanized areas. We showed that dogs interacted more frequently with chilla foxes (57 interactions) than with culpeo foxes (15 interactions), and the first interaction type occurred almost exclusively at the periurban site, where dogs and chillas were more frequently detected than in the other sites. We detected a marked temporal segregation between dogs and foxes, but dog-chilla interactions resulted in shorter time intervals (2.5 median days) compared to dog-culpeo interactions (7.6 median days), suggesting a higher potential risk of pathogen spillover between the first species pairing. Based on previous studies, we suggest periurban zones may constitute a potential focus of pathogen exposure between dog and fox populations in the study area. Our research contributes to improving the knowledge on the spatio-temporal patterns of interspecific contact between invasive and native carnivores within the context of multi-host pathogen dynamics. Our outcomes will inform theoretical epidemiological models designed to predict and minimize the contact risk between domestic and threatened species, guiding effective control strategies at the wildlife-domestic interface.
家犬()常常在人类与野生动物共有的界面上共同生活,作为捕食者、猎物、竞争者以及多种多宿主病原体的宿主与野生犬科动物相互作用,例如犬科传播的微小和大型寄生虫,这些寄生虫可能会影响野生动物、家畜和公共卫生。然而,作为家犬和野生犬科动物之间病原体传播促进因素的间接相互作用的时空模式在很大程度上尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们使用相机陷阱来描述家犬、智利狐()和草原狐()的活动模式及栖息地利用情况,并通过智利科金博地区的人为化梯度来确定可能影响家犬与狐狸相互作用频率的局部尺度因素。我们评估了可能预测家犬与狐狸之间相互作用次数的局部尺度变量,并比较了家犬与草原狐以及家犬与智利狐相互作用之间的时间间隔。我们的研究结果表明,靠近城市化区域可预测家犬与狐狸之间间接相互作用的频率。我们发现在毗邻两个沿海城镇(通戈伊和瓜纳克罗斯)的城郊地点,家犬与狐狸的相互作用次数较多(60次相互作用),相比之下,另外两个受干扰较少、距离城市化区域越来越远的地点则只有12次相互作用。我们发现,家犬与智利狐的相互作用更为频繁(57次相互作用),而与草原狐的相互作用较少(15次相互作用),并且第一种相互作用类型几乎只发生在城郊地点,在该地点家犬和智利狐比在其他地点更频繁地被检测到。我们检测到家犬和狐狸之间存在明显时间隔离,但家犬与智利狐的相互作用导致的时间间隔(中位数为2.5天)比家犬与草原狐的相互作用(中位数为7.6天)更短,这表明在第一种物种配对之间病原体溢出的潜在风险更高。基于先前的研究,我们认为城郊区域可能是研究区域内家犬和狐狸种群之间病原体暴露的潜在焦点。我们的研究有助于增进对多宿主病原体动态背景下入侵食肉动物与本地食肉动物种间接触时空模式的了解。我们的研究结果将为旨在预测和最小化家犬与受威胁物种之间接触风险的理论流行病学模型提供信息,指导野生动物与家犬界面的有效控制策略。