• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
People's preferences for self-management support.人们对自我管理支持的偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):91-101. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13635. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Using discrete-choice experiments to elicit preferences for digital wearable health technology for self-management of chronic kidney disease.使用离散选择实验来引出对数字可穿戴健康技术用于慢性肾脏病自我管理的偏好。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Oct 26;38(1):e77. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322003233.
3
A discrete-choice experiment to elicit preferences of patients with epilepsy for self-management programs.一项用于引出癫痫患者对自我管理项目偏好的离散选择实验。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Feb;79:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
4
Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetes care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.糖尿病患者对德国糖尿病护理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Oct;24(8):997-1007. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2369293. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions.以患者为中心的护理不同方面的价值:针对慢性病患者的一系列离散选择实验
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 26;7(4):e015689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015689.
7
Patient preferences for community pharmacy asthma services: a discrete choice experiment.患者对社区药店哮喘服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):961-76. doi: 10.2165/11594350-000000000-00000.
8
Preferences of people with Type 2 diabetes for diabetes care: a discrete choice experiment.2 型糖尿病患者对糖尿病护理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Diabet Med. 2020 Nov;37(11):1807-1815. doi: 10.1111/dme.13969. Epub 2019 May 6.
9
What are colorectal cancer survivors' preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment.结直肠癌幸存者对饮食建议有哪些偏好?一项最佳-最差离散选择实验。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Dec;11(6):782-790. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0615-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
10
Preferences for HIV testing services among men who have sex with men in the UK: A discrete choice experiment.英国男男性行为者对 HIV 检测服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 11;16(4):e1002779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002779. eCollection 2019 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Self-management education for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia as major risk factors for cardiovascular disease: Insights from stakeholders' experiences and expectations.高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常的自我管理教育作为心血管疾病的主要危险因素:利益相关者的经验和期望的见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 26;19(9):e0310961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310961. eCollection 2024.
3
Patient preferences for generic substitution policies: a discrete choice experiment in China.患者对通用名药品替代政策的偏好:中国的一项离散选择实验。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 2;15:1400156. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1400156. eCollection 2024.
4
Intensive out-of-hospital coaching for frequently hospitalized COPD patients: a before-after feasibility study.对频繁住院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者进行强化院外指导:一项前后对比的可行性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 17;10:1195481. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1195481. eCollection 2023.
5
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the self-management support scale for kidney transplant recipients.肾移植受者自我管理支持量表中文版的编制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2023 Apr 18;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01269-x.
6
What affected UK adults' adherence to medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic? Cross-sectional survey in a representative sample of people with long-term conditions.在新冠疫情期间,是什么影响了英国成年人的药物依从性?针对患有长期疾病的代表性人群样本开展的横断面调查。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023 Jan 19:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Social value and individual choice: The value of a choice-based decision-making process in a collectively funded health system.社会价值与个人选择:集体筹资医疗体系中基于选择的决策过程的价值
Health Econ. 2018 Feb;27(2):e28-e40. doi: 10.1002/hec.3559. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
2
Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理干预措施(包括针对病情加重的行动计划)与常规护理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD011682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011682.pub2.
3
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
4
Toward consensus on self-management support: the international chronic condition self-management support framework.迈向自我管理支持的共识:国际慢性病自我管理支持框架
Health Promot Int. 2017 Dec 1;32(6):942-952. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw030.
5
The impact of self-monitoring in chronic illness on healthcare utilisation: a systematic review of reviews.慢性病自我监测对医疗保健利用的影响:一项综述的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 18;15:565. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1221-5.
6
Effectiveness of the Restore4Stroke self-management intervention "Plan ahead!": A randomized controlled trial in stroke patients and partners.“提前规划!”康复4中风自我管理干预措施的有效性:一项针对中风患者及其家属的随机对照试验
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Nov;47(10):901-9. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2020.
7
The PRISMS taxonomy of self-management support: derivation of a novel taxonomy and initial testing of its utility.自我管理支持的PRISMS分类法:一种新型分类法的推导及其效用的初步测试。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Apr;21(2):73-82. doi: 10.1177/1355819615602725. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Chronic disease self-management support: public health perspectives.慢性病自我管理支持:公共卫生视角
Front Public Health. 2015 Apr 27;2:234. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00234. eCollection 2014.
9
Tailoring of self-management interventions in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者自我管理干预措施的个性化定制。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2015 Jun;12(3):223-35. doi: 10.1007/s11897-015-0259-3.
10
The effectiveness of self-management support interventions for men with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对患有长期疾病男性的自我管理支持干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 20;5(3):e006620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006620.

人们对自我管理支持的偏好。

People's preferences for self-management support.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):91-101. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13635. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.13635
PMID:33634466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8763292/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify and assess the preferences of people with long-term health conditions toward generalizable characteristics of self-management support interventions, with the objective to inform the design of more person-centered support services.

DATA SOURCES

Primary qualitative and quantitative data collected on a representative sample of individuals with at least one of the fifteen most prevalent long-term conditions in the UK.

STUDY DESIGN

Targeted literature review followed by a series of one-to-one qualitative semistructured interviews and a large-scale discrete choice experiment.

DATA COLLECTION

Digital recording of one-to-one qualitative interviews, one-to-one cognitive interviews, and a series of online quantitative surveys, including two best-worst scaling and one discrete choice experiment, with individuals with long-term conditions.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

On average, patients preferred a self-management support intervention that (a) discusses the options available to the patient and make her choose, (b) is individual-based, (c) face to face (d) with doctor or nurse, (e) at the GP practice, (f) sessions shorter than 1 hour, and (g) occurring annually for two-third of the sample and monthly for the rest. We found heterogeneity in preferences via three latent classes, with class sizes of 41% (C1), 30% (C2), and 29% (C3). The individuals' gender [P < 0.05(C1), P < 0.01(C3)], age [P < 0.05(C1), P < 0.05(C2)], type of long-term condition [P < 0.05(C1), P < 0.01(C3)], and presence of comorbidity [P < 0.01(C1), P < 0.01(C3), P < 0.01(C3)] were able to characterize differences between these latent classes and help understand the heterogeneity of preferences toward the above mentioned features of self-management support interventions. These findings were then used to profile individuals into different preference groups, for each of whom the most desirable form of self-management support, one that was more likely to be adopted by the recipient, could be designed.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several factors that could be used to inform a more nuanced self-management support service design and provision that take into account the recipient's characteristics and preferences.

摘要

目的

确定并评估患有长期健康状况的人群对自我管理支持干预措施的可推广特征的偏好,旨在为更以患者为中心的支持服务设计提供信息。

数据来源

在英国最常见的 15 种长期疾病之一的代表性样本中收集的主要定性和定量数据。

研究设计

针对文献进行综述,然后进行一系列一对一的定性半结构化访谈和大规模离散选择实验。

数据收集

对患有长期疾病的个体进行一对一的定性访谈、一对一的认知访谈以及一系列在线定量调查的数字记录,包括两项最佳最差标度和一项离散选择实验。

主要发现

平均而言,患者更喜欢以下自我管理支持干预措施:(a) 讨论患者可选择的方案并让她做出选择,(b) 基于个体,(c) 面对面(d)与医生或护士,(e) 在全科医生诊所,(f) 每次就诊时间少于 1 小时,(g) 三分之二的样本每年进行一次,其余的每月进行一次。我们通过三个潜在类别发现了偏好的异质性,类别大小分别为 41%(C1)、30%(C2)和 29%(C3)。个体的性别[P<0.05(C1),P<0.01(C3)]、年龄[P<0.05(C1),P<0.05(C2)]、长期疾病类型[P<0.05(C1),P<0.01(C3)]和合并症的存在[P<0.01(C1),P<0.01(C3),P<0.01(C3)]能够描述这些潜在类别之间的差异,并有助于理解对自我管理支持干预措施上述特征的偏好异质性。然后,这些发现被用于为不同的偏好群体对个体进行分析,为每位患者设计最理想的自我管理支持形式,这种形式更有可能被患者接受。

结论

我们确定了一些因素,可以用来为更细致入微的自我管理支持服务设计和提供提供信息,这些因素考虑到了接受者的特征和偏好。