• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2 型糖尿病患者对糖尿病护理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Preferences of people with Type 2 diabetes for diabetes care: a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2020 Nov;37(11):1807-1815. doi: 10.1111/dme.13969. Epub 2019 May 6.

DOI:10.1111/dme.13969
PMID:31001855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7586937/
Abstract

AIMS

Limited knowledge exists on the preferences of people with Type 2 diabetes towards diabetes care. Consequently, these care preferences cannot yet be considered in the development of tailored diabetes care approaches. Therefore, this study aimed to assess care preferences and their determinants in people with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was conducted to elicit people's preferences. People with Type 2 diabetes, treated in 30 Dutch primary care practices, were asked to choose repeatedly between two hypothetical diabetes care packages, which differed in six attributes: role division in daily diabetes care planning, lifestyle education method, type of medication management support, consultation frequency, emotional support and time spend on self-management. A mixed-logit model was used to estimate the relative importance of the included attributes. Preference heterogeneity among people with different person- and disease-related characteristics was investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 288 participants completed the experiment. They preferred to plan their daily diabetes care together with a healthcare provider, to receive individual lifestyle education, medication and emotional support from a healthcare provider, one consultation visit every 3 months and to spend less time on self-management. Participants did not prefer to receive emotional support from a psychologist. Heterogeneity in preferences could partly be explained by differences in sex, education level and glucose-lowering drug use.

CONCLUSION

People with Type 2 diabetes show a preference for traditional care models. Emotional support was identified by participants as the most important attribute. It is therefore important to adequately guide them when changes in diabetes care organization are implemented.

摘要

目的

关于 2 型糖尿病患者对糖尿病护理的偏好,目前相关知识有限。因此,在制定量身定制的糖尿病护理方法时,还不能考虑这些护理偏好。因此,本研究旨在评估 2 型糖尿病患者的护理偏好及其决定因素。

方法

采用离散选择实验来评估患者的偏好。在 30 家荷兰初级保健诊所接受治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者被要求在两种假设的糖尿病护理方案之间反复选择,这两种方案在六个属性上有所不同:日常糖尿病护理计划中的角色分工、生活方式教育方法、药物管理支持类型、咨询频率、情感支持和自我管理时间。采用混合 logit 模型来估计纳入属性的相对重要性。研究了不同个体和疾病相关特征人群之间的偏好异质性。

结果

共有 288 名参与者完成了实验。他们更喜欢与医疗保健提供者共同规划日常糖尿病护理,接受个体化的生活方式教育,接受医疗保健提供者提供的药物和情感支持,每 3 个月就诊一次,并减少自我管理的时间。参与者不喜欢从心理学家那里获得情感支持。偏好的异质性部分可以用性别、教育程度和降糖药物使用的差异来解释。

结论

2 型糖尿病患者表现出对传统护理模式的偏好。参与者认为情感支持是最重要的属性。因此,在实施糖尿病护理组织变革时,有必要对他们进行适当的引导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abb/7586937/19c463bf78d6/DME-37-1807-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abb/7586937/368033a839c5/DME-37-1807-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abb/7586937/19c463bf78d6/DME-37-1807-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abb/7586937/368033a839c5/DME-37-1807-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9abb/7586937/19c463bf78d6/DME-37-1807-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Preferences of people with Type 2 diabetes for diabetes care: a discrete choice experiment.2 型糖尿病患者对糖尿病护理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Diabet Med. 2020 Nov;37(11):1807-1815. doi: 10.1111/dme.13969. Epub 2019 May 6.
2
Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetes care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.糖尿病患者对德国糖尿病护理的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Oct;24(8):997-1007. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2369293. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
A discrete-choice experiment to elicit preferences of patients with epilepsy for self-management programs.一项用于引出癫痫患者对自我管理项目偏好的离散选择实验。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Feb;79:58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
4
Type 2 diabetes patients' preferences and willingness to pay for lifestyle programs: a discrete choice experiment.2 型糖尿病患者对生活方式项目的偏好和支付意愿:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Nov 29;13:1099. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1099.
5
A discrete-choice experiment to quantify patient preferences for frequency of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist injections in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.一项离散选择实验,用于量化患者对胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂注射频率在2型糖尿病治疗中的偏好。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(2):251-62. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1117433. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Personalized diabetes management: what do patients with diabetes mellitus prefer? A discrete choice experiment.个体化糖尿病管理:糖尿病患者更喜欢什么?一项离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Apr;22(3):425-443. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01264-6. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Conducting a Discrete-Choice Experiment Study Following Recommendations for Good Research Practices: An Application for Eliciting Patient Preferences for Diabetes Treatments.遵循良好研究实践建议开展离散选择实验研究:一项用于引出患者对糖尿病治疗偏好的应用研究。
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
8
Patient Preferences for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment.晚期癌症患者对疼痛管理的偏好:来自离散选择实验的结果。
Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):643-651. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0236-x.
9
Evaluating Preferences of Hospitalized Diabetes Patients for Hospital-Wide Glycemic Control Programme: A Discrete Choice Experiment.评估住院糖尿病患者对全院血糖控制方案的偏好:一项离散选择实验
J Diabetes Res. 2024 Sep 6;2024:2552658. doi: 10.1155/2024/2552658. eCollection 2024.
10
How Do Type 2 Diabetes Patients Value Urban Integrated Primary Care in China? Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.2 型糖尿病患者如何看待中国的城市综合初级保健?一项离散选择实验的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 23;17(1):117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010117.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Powerful together with diabetes, a group-based self-management intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes from lower educational groups: study protocol for a hybrid type 2 evaluation.糖尿病与强大力量相结合,针对低教育水平2型糖尿病患者的基于群体的自我管理干预:混合型2期评估研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):e087767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087767.
3
Patient perspectives about treatment preferences for obesity with complications.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)的共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖的管理。
Diabetologia. 2018 Dec;61(12):2461-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5.
2
Perceptions of insulin use in type 2 diabetes in primary care: a thematic synthesis.基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者对胰岛素使用的认知:一项主题综合分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 22;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0753-2.
3
Implementation of a Structured Diabetes Consultation Model to Facilitate a Person-Centered Approach: Results From a Nationwide Dutch Study.
患者对肥胖并发症治疗偏好的看法。
Obes Sci Pract. 2023 Oct 29;10(1):e720. doi: 10.1002/osp4.720. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Identifying patient preferences for diabetes care: A protocol for implementing a discrete choice experiment in Samoa.确定糖尿病患者对护理的偏好:萨摩亚实施离散选择实验的方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 22;18(12):e0295845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295845. eCollection 2023.
5
Supporting professionals to implement integrated, person-centered care for people with chronic conditions: the TARGET pilot study.支持专业人员为慢性病患者实施综合的、以患者为中心的护理:TARGET 试点研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Dec;41(4):377-391. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2250392. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
6
Feasibility and acceptability of 'low-intensity mental health support via a telehealth-enabled network' for adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: the LISTEN pilot study.通过远程医疗网络提供“低强度心理健康支持”对1型和2型糖尿病成人患者的可行性和可接受性:倾听试点研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jul 27;9(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01367-2.
7
Investigating patients' preferences for new anti-diabetic drugs to inform public health insurance coverage decisions: a discrete choice experiment in China.调查患者对新型抗糖尿病药物的偏好,为公共医疗保险覆盖决策提供信息:在中国进行的一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):1860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14244-z.
8
Preferences of oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: Attributes development for a discrete choice experiment.胃癌术后患者对口服营养补充治疗的偏好:离散选择实验的属性开发。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 29;17(9):e0275209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275209. eCollection 2022.
9
People with type 2 diabetes' experiences of emotional support in Australian general practice: a qualitative study.2型糖尿病患者在澳大利亚全科医疗中获得情感支持的经历:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2022 Dec 20;6(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0079. Print 2022 Dec.
10
Preferences for oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: a discrete choice experiment.胃癌术后患者对口服营养补充治疗的偏好:离散选择实验。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7447-7456. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07154-8. Epub 2022 May 27.
实施结构化糖尿病咨询模式以促进以人为本的方法:一项全国性荷兰研究的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Apr;41(4):688-695. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1194. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Socially isolated individuals are more prone to have newly diagnosed and prevalent type 2 diabetes mellitus - the Maastricht study.社交孤立的个体更易患新诊断的和已患有的2型糖尿病——马斯特里赫特研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):955. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4948-6.
5
A risk score including body mass index, glycated haemoglobin and triglycerides predicts future glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.一个包含体重指数、糖化血红蛋白和甘油三酯的风险评分可预测 2 型糖尿病患者未来的血糖控制情况。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):681-688. doi: 10.1111/dom.13148. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
6
"In the physio we trust": A qualitative study on patients' preferences for physiotherapy.“我们信赖物理治疗”:一项关于患者对物理治疗偏好的定性研究
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Jul;33(7):535-549. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1328720. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
7
Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy on glycaemic control and psychological outcomes in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.认知行为疗法对成年糖尿病患者血糖控制及心理状况的有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Diabet Med. 2017 Mar;34(3):328-339. doi: 10.1111/dme.13195. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
8
A qualitative study of patient experiences of Type 2 Diabetes care delivered comparatively by General Practice Nurses and Medical Practitioners.一项关于全科护士和执业医生相对提供2型糖尿病护理的患者体验的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1977-86. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13219.
9
Discrete Choice Experiment Response Rates: A Meta-analysis.离散选择实验的应答率:一项荟萃分析
Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):810-817. doi: 10.1002/hec.3354. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Dutch diabetes prevalence estimates (DUDE-1).荷兰糖尿病患病率估计值(DUDE-1)。
J Diabetes. 2016 Nov;8(6):863-865. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12370. Epub 2016 Mar 23.