Effects of hot and cold debriefing in simulation with case-based learning.

AIM

For successful simulation-based learning (SBL), a structured interactive and bidirectional debriefing should be a prerequisite. The purpose of this study is to identify the effects of instructor-led hot debriefing (debriefing immediately after simulation) and cold debriefing (debriefing occurring after a certain period following simulation) in simulation with case-based learning (CBL).

METHOD

This study used a nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design. A sample of 59 fourth-year nursing students in South Korea were invited and randomly divided into two groups, a post-simulation hot debriefing (PSHD, male = 4, female = 26), and cold debriefing (PSCD, male = 3, female = 26). We used clinical performance competency, satisfaction with CBL and SBL, and debriefing tools. The study period was from October to December of 2019. We analyzed the data with SPSS 23.0 software, using descriptive statistics and the t test.

RESULTS

Clinical performance competency means that the scores of both groups were significantly improved in the posttest (PSHD = 33.13 ± 5.11, PSCD = 34.10 ± 4.15) as compared to those in the pretest (t = -7.010, p < .001). The knowledge (t = -12.689, p < .001) and skill (t = -5.338, p = .001) scores of clinical performance competency in the PSCD were higher than those in the PSHD. The mean satisfaction scores of the PSHD group with CBL (4.53 ± 0.60) and debriefing (4.66 ± 0.55) was higher than for those in the PSCD group.

CONCLUSION

As a result of this study, PSHD and PSCD led by an instructor improved student clinical performance competency. The PSHD method, in particular, might be a positive influence on learner satisfaction with CBL, SBL, and debriefing.