Suppr超能文献

同伴反馈与模拟教学中教员指导反馈的比较:护理方向

Peer Debriefing Versus Instructor-Led Debriefing for Nursing Simulation.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2021 Feb 1;60(2):90-95. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20210120-06.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Debriefing is the reflective process following the simulation experience. We aimed to compare the debriefing assessment and debriefing satisfaction perceived by nursing students who underwent different debriefing methods.

METHOD

An experimental study conducted on three groups (instructor-led debriefing, peer debriefing, and combined debriefing) was performed for 177 nursing students. Differences in the debriefing satisfaction were assessed using the Clinical Experience Simulation scale, the Visual Analogue scale, and the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH).

RESULTS

VAS scores for satisfaction differed significantly between the instructor-led debriefing, peer debriefing, and combined debriefing groups. In the Clinical Experience Simulation scale, the combined debriefing group was significantly higher compared with instructor-led debriefing. The total score for DASH was significantly higher in the combined debriefing group compared with instructor-led debriefing, and in instructor-led debriefing compared with peer debriefing.

CONCLUSION

Combining debriefing after a simulation session improves the debriefing satisfaction and the perceived debriefing assessment among nursing students. [J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):90-95.].

摘要

背景

讲评是模拟体验后的反思过程。我们旨在比较接受不同讲评方法的护理学生对讲评评估和讲评满意度的感知。

方法

对 177 名护理学生进行了一项实验组研究,分为三组(教师主导讲评、同伴讲评和联合讲评)。使用临床经验模拟量表、视觉模拟量表和模拟医疗讲评评估量表(DASH)评估讲评满意度的差异。

结果

满意度的 VAS 评分在教师主导讲评、同伴讲评和联合讲评组之间存在显著差异。在临床经验模拟量表中,联合讲评组的评分明显高于教师主导讲评组。DASH 的总分在联合讲评组中明显高于教师主导讲评组,在教师主导讲评组中明显高于同伴讲评组。

结论

在模拟课程结束后进行联合讲评可提高护理学生的讲评满意度和讲评评估感知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验