Department of Psychology, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines, and University Research Co., LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Department of Psychology, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines.
Int J Prison Health. 2020 Aug 17;16(4):343-358. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-09-2019-0044.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a psychosocial treatment program for prisoners incarcerated because of methamphetamine use. It compared the outcomes of prisoners who received the program while incarcerated, those who were released and received the treatment as part of community-based drug recovery program and a waitlist-control group (WC) with no treatment.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A quasi-experimental design was use with pre- and post-test surveys administered to three groups: a WC group, a pre-release treatment-while-incarcerated (TWI) group, and a post-release outpatient treatment group (OP). Surveys measured recovery skills, life skills and substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms were administered before and after the intervention.
Results revealed that at baseline OP and TWI had significant higher recovery skills compared to WC group. However, in terms of life skills, there was no significant difference observed among the WC, OP and TWI group at baseline. TWI had a significantly lower number of SUD symptoms compared to the WC group at baseline. As hypothesized, findings revealed significant changes in recovery and life skills among the OP and TWI group compared to the WC group. No significant change in SUD scores were observed for all groups.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: A major limitation of the study was the use of a quasi-experimental design because legal issues did not allow a randomized control trial. Future research using randomized controlled trial designs would provide more robust conclusions on the impact of the intervention. The study design was also limited to pre- and post-evaluation. Further studies are encouraged to look at longitudinal outcomes of appears on SUD symptoms and possibility of relapse.
Given that there were no significant differences in outcomes between OP and TWI groups, results suggest that the program may serve either as a pre- or post-release program for incarcerated drug users. However, results also suggest that completion is higher when the program is used as a pre-release program. Delivering the program prior to release also reduces challenges related to attrition including conflict in schedules and the lack of resources for transportation.
The study suggests the value of psychosocial treatment as opposed to punitive approaches in dealing with drug use. In particular, delivering interventions prior to release can prepare participants for problems they may encounter during reintegration and prevent recidivism. In a country where drug-related killings are on the rise, the study presents an alternate and restorative justice approach.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The study addresses a dearth in the literature on psychosocial intervention for methamphetamine users. It also fills a vacuum in studies from developing countries such as the Philippines.
本研究旨在评估一项针对因使用甲基苯丙胺而被监禁的囚犯的心理社会治疗方案。它比较了接受该方案的囚犯的结果,包括那些在监禁期间接受治疗的囚犯、那些在社区戒毒康复计划中获得治疗的囚犯和等待治疗的对照组(WC)。
设计/方法/方法:采用准实验设计,对三组进行了预-后测调查:WC 组、提前释放治疗组(TWI)和门诊治疗组(OP)。调查在干预前后测量了康复技能、生活技能和药物使用障碍(SUD)症状。
结果显示,在基线时,OP 和 TWI 组的康复技能明显高于 WC 组。然而,在生活技能方面,WC、OP 和 TWI 组在基线时没有观察到显著差异。TWI 组的 SUD 症状数量明显低于 WC 组。正如假设的那样,研究结果显示,OP 和 TWI 组与 WC 组相比,在康复和生活技能方面有显著变化。所有组的 SUD 评分均无显著变化。
研究限制/影响:该研究的一个主要限制是使用准实验设计,因为法律问题不允许进行随机对照试验。使用随机对照试验设计的未来研究将提供更有力的结论,说明干预的影响。研究设计也仅限于预-后评估。鼓励进一步研究关注 SUD 症状的纵向结果和复发的可能性。
鉴于 OP 和 TWI 组之间的结果没有显著差异,结果表明该方案可以作为监禁吸毒者的释放前或释放后方案。然而,结果还表明,当该方案用作释放前方案时,完成率更高。在释放前提供该方案还可以减少与缺勤相关的挑战,包括日程安排冲突和缺乏交通资源。
该研究表明,与惩罚性方法相比,心理社会治疗在处理药物使用方面具有价值。特别是,在释放前提供干预措施可以为参与者在重新融入社会期间可能遇到的问题做好准备,并防止重新犯罪。在一个与毒品有关的杀戮事件不断上升的国家,该研究提出了一种替代和恢复性司法方法。
原创性/价值:该研究解决了心理社会干预对甲基苯丙胺使用者的文献缺乏问题。它还填补了菲律宾等发展中国家研究的空白。