Suppr超能文献

物质使用障碍患者的法律纠纷解决干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

A legal dispute resolution intervention for patients with substance use disorders: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute for Social Research, Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA.

Georgetown University, McCourt School of Public Policy, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, DC, 20057, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;23(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15296-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent major public health concerns and are linked to enhanced risk of legal consequences. Unresolved legal issues may prevent individuals with SUD from completing treatment. Interventions aimed at improving SUD treatment outcomes are limited. Filling that gap, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) tests the ability of a technology-assisted intervention to increase SUD treatment completion rates and improve post-treatment health, economic, justice-system, and housing outcomes.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with a two-year administrative follow-up period will be conducted. Eight hundred Medicaid eligible and uninsured adults receiving SUD treatment will be recruited at community-based non-profit health care clinics in Southeast, Michigan, USA. Using an algorithm embedded in a community-based case management system, we randomly assign all eligible adults to one of two groups. The treatment/intervention group will receive hands-on assistance with a technology aimed at resolving unaddressed legal issues and the control group receives no treatment. Upon enrollment into the intervention, both treatment (n = 400) and control groups (n = 400) retain traditional options to resolve unaddressed legal issues, such as hiring an attorney, but only the treatment group is targeted the technology and offered personalized assistance in navigating the online legal platform. To develop baseline and historical contexts for participants, we collect life course history reports from all participants and intend to link those in each group to administrative data sources. In addition to the randomized controlled trial (RCT), we used an exploratory sequential mixed methods and participatory-based design to develop, test, and administer our life course history instruments to all participants. The primary objective is to test whether targeting no-cost online legal resources to those experiencing SUD improves their long-term recovery and decreases negative health, economic, justice-system, and housing outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Findings from this RCT will improve our understanding of the acute socio-legal needs faced by those experiencing SUD and provide recommendations to help target resources toward the areas that best support long-term recovery. The public health impact includes making publicly available a deidentified, longitudinal dataset of uninsured and Medicaid eligible clients in treatment for SUD. Data include an overrepresentation of understudied groups including African American and American Indian Alaska Native persons documented to experience heightened risk for SUD-related premature mortality and justice-system involvement. Within these data, several intended outcome measures can inform the health policy landscape: (1) health, including substance use, disability, mental health diagnosis, and mortality; (2) financial health, including employment, earnings, public assistance receipt, and financial obligations to the state; (3) justice-system involvement, including civil and criminal legal system encounters; (4) housing, including homelessness, household composition, and homeownership.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered # NCT05665179 on December 27, 2022.

摘要

背景

物质使用障碍(SUD)是主要的公共卫生问题,与法律后果风险增加有关。未解决的法律问题可能会妨碍 SUD 患者完成治疗。旨在改善 SUD 治疗效果的干预措施有限。为了填补这一空白,这项随机对照试验(RCT)测试了一种技术辅助干预措施提高 SUD 治疗完成率并改善治疗后健康、经济、司法系统和住房结果的能力。

方法

将进行一项为期两年行政随访期的随机对照试验。将在美国东南部密歇根州的社区非营利性医疗保健诊所招募 800 名符合医疗补助资格和无保险的接受 SUD 治疗的成年人。使用嵌入社区为基础的个案管理系统中的算法,我们将所有符合条件的成年人随机分配到两组之一。治疗/干预组将获得解决未解决法律问题的技术的实际帮助,对照组则不接受治疗。在干预开始时,治疗组(n=400)和对照组(n=400)都保留了解决未解决法律问题的传统选择,例如聘请律师,但只有治疗组会得到该技术的目标,并提供个性化的在线法律平台导航帮助。为了为参与者建立生活史背景和历史背景,我们从所有参与者那里收集生活史报告,并打算将每组的报告与行政数据来源联系起来。除了随机对照试验(RCT)外,我们还使用探索性序贯混合方法和基于参与的设计来开发、测试和管理我们的生活史工具,供所有参与者使用。主要目标是测试针对 SUD 患者的免费在线法律资源是否能改善他们的长期康复并减少负面健康、经济、司法系统和住房结果。

讨论

这项 RCT 的结果将提高我们对 SUD 患者面临的急性社会法律需求的理解,并提供帮助将资源集中到最能支持长期康复的领域的建议。公共卫生影响包括公开提供一组未识别的、接受 SUD 治疗的无保险和符合医疗补助条件的客户的纵向数据集。这些数据包括对研究不足的群体的代表性,包括非裔美国人和美国印第安人阿拉斯加原住民,他们被记录为经历 SUD 相关过早死亡和司法系统参与的风险增加。在这些数据中,有几个预期的结果衡量标准可以为卫生政策领域提供信息:(1)健康,包括物质使用、残疾、心理健康诊断和死亡率;(2)财务健康,包括就业、收入、公共援助领取和对州的财务义务;(3)司法系统参与,包括民事和刑事法律系统遭遇;(4)住房,包括无家可归、家庭组成和住房所有权。

试验注册

于 2022 年 12 月 27 日回顾性注册#NCT05665179。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions.研究货币制裁体系。
RSF. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):1-33. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2022.8.1.01.
2
Client attitudes toward virtual treatment court.当事人对虚拟治疗法庭的态度。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Sep;140:108833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108833. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
4
Monetary Sanctions: Legal Financial Obligations in US Systems of Justice.货币制裁:美国司法系统中的法律财务义务
Annu Rev Criminol. 2018 Jan;1:471-495. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091915. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
8
Long-term course of opioid addiction.阿片类药物成瘾的长期病程。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):76-89. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000052.
10
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.实现混合方法设计的整合——原则与实践。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验