Prevention Research Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jan-Feb;137(1):32-47. doi: 10.1177/0033354920988871. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Research synthesis, through qualitative or quantitative systematic reviews, allows for integrating results of primary research to improve public health. We examined more than 2 decades of work in HIV prevention by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis (PRS) Project. We describe the context and contributions of research synthesis, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses, through the experience of the PRS Project.
We reviewed PRS Project publications and products and summarized PRS contributions from 1996 to July 2020 in 4 areas: synthesis of interventions and epidemiologic studies, synthesis methods, prevention programs, and prevention policy.
PRS Project publications summarized risk behaviors and effects of prevention interventions (eg, changing one's perception of risk, teaching condom negotiation skills) across populations at risk for HIV infection and intervention approaches (eg, one-on-one or group meetings) as the HIV/AIDS epidemic and science evolved. We used the PRS Project cumulative database and intervention efficacy reviews to contribute to prevention programs and policies through identification of evidence-based interventions and development of program guidance. Subject matter experts and scientific evidence informed PRS Project products and contributions, which were implemented through strategic programmatic partnerships.
The contributions of the PRS Project to HIV prevention and public health efforts in the United States can be credited to CDC's long-standing support of the project and its context within a federal prevention agency, where HIV programs and policies were developed and implemented. The effect of the PRS Project was likely facilitated by opportunities to directly influence program and policy because of connections with other research translation activities and program and policy decision making within CDC.
通过定性或定量的系统综述进行研究综合,可以整合原始研究结果,以改善公共卫生。我们检查了美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防研究综合(PRS)项目 20 多年来在艾滋病毒预防方面的工作。我们通过 PRS 项目的经验描述了研究综合(包括系统评价和荟萃分析)的背景和贡献。
我们回顾了 PRS 项目的出版物和产品,并总结了 PRS 项目从 1996 年到 2020 年 7 月在四个领域的贡献:干预措施和流行病学研究的综合、综合方法、预防计划和预防政策。
PRS 项目出版物总结了感染艾滋病毒风险人群和干预措施(如改变对风险的看法、教授避孕套谈判技巧)的风险行为和预防干预措施的效果,随着艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行和科学的发展,干预措施的方法也在不断变化(如一对一或小组会议)。我们利用 PRS 项目累积数据库和干预效果评价,通过确定基于证据的干预措施和制定方案指南,为预防计划和政策做出贡献。主题专家和科学证据为 PRS 项目的产品和贡献提供了信息,这些产品和贡献通过战略性的方案伙伴关系得到实施。
PRS 项目对美国艾滋病毒预防和公共卫生工作的贡献可以归功于 CDC 对该项目的长期支持,以及该项目在联邦预防机构内的背景,在该机构内制定和实施了艾滋病毒方案和政策。PRS 项目的效果可能得益于与其他研究转化活动以及 CDC 内部的方案和政策决策的直接联系,从而有机会直接影响方案和政策。