Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
Boston University, Boston.
AIDS. 2021 Jun 1;35(7):1015-1020. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002850.
HIV proviral sequencing overcomes the limit of plasma viral load requirement by detecting all the 'archived mutations', but the clinical relevance remains to be evaluated.
We included 25 participants with available proviral sequences (both intact and defective sequences available) and utilized the genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) to evaluate the level of resistance in their provirus and plasma virus. Defective sequences were further categorized as sequences with and without hypermutations. Personalized GSS score and total GSS score were calculated to evaluate the level of resistance to a whole panel of antiretroviral therapies and to certain antiretroviral therapy that a participant was using. The rate of sequences with drug resistance mutations (DRMs) within each sequence compartment (intact, defective and plasma viral sequences) was calculated for each participant.
Defective proviral sequences harbored more DRMs than other sequence compartments, with a median DRM rate of 0.25 compared with intact sequences (0.0, P = 0.014) and plasma sequences (0.095, P = 0.30). Defective sequences with hypermutations were the major source of DRMs, with a median DRM rate of 1.0 compared with defective sequences without hypermutations (0.042, P < 0.001). Certain Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3-related DRMs including reverse transcriptase gene mutations M184I, E138K, M230I, G190E and protease gene mutations M46I, D30N were enriched in hypermutated sequences but not in intact sequences or plasma sequences. All the hypermutated sequences had premature stop codons due to Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3.
Proviral sequencing may overestimate DRMs as a result of hypermutations. Removing hypermutated sequences is essential in the interpretation of proviral drug resistance testing.
HIV 前病毒测序通过检测所有“存档突变”克服了对血浆病毒载量要求的限制,但临床相关性仍有待评估。
我们纳入了 25 名可获得前病毒序列(完整和缺陷序列均可用)的参与者,并利用基因型耐药评分(GSS)评估其前病毒和血浆病毒中的耐药水平。进一步将缺陷序列分为有和无高突变的序列。计算个性化 GSS 评分和总 GSS 评分,以评估对整个抗逆转录病毒治疗方案和参与者正在使用的特定抗逆转录病毒治疗方案的耐药水平。计算每个参与者每个序列区(完整、缺陷和血浆病毒序列)中耐药突变(DRM)序列的比例。
缺陷前病毒序列比其他序列区携带更多的 DRMs,其 DRM 比例中位数为 0.25,与完整序列(0.0,P=0.014)和血浆序列(0.095,P=0.30)相比。高突变缺陷序列是 DRMs 的主要来源,其 DRM 比例中位数为 1.0,与无高突变缺陷序列(0.042,P<0.001)相比。某些载脂蛋白 B 编辑复合物 3 相关的 DRM 包括逆转录酶基因突变 M184I、E138K、M230I、G190E 和蛋白酶基因突变 M46I、D30N,在高突变序列中富集,但不在完整序列或血浆序列中富集。所有高突变序列由于载脂蛋白 B 编辑复合物 3 而具有过早终止密码子。
前病毒测序可能由于高突变而高估 DRMs。在解释前病毒耐药性检测时,去除高突变序列是必不可少的。