• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)阴茎癌隐匿性腹股沟淋巴结转移的当代发生率和预测因素。

Contemporary Incidence and Predictors of Occult Inguinal Lymph Node Metastases in Men With Clinically Node-negative (cN0) Penile Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Urology. 2021 Jul;153:221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.019
PMID:33636210
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To (1) examine the contemporary incidence of occult inguinal LN metastases and (2) identify predictors of occult inguinal LN metastases to improve selection of cN0 patients for inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND).

METHODS

We identified 590 men with cTany cN0 cM0 penile cancer who underwent partial/radical penectomy and ILND from 2006-2016 in the NCDB. Rates of pN+ disease were examined, and a multivariable regression model was constructed to identify features associated with pN+ disease.

RESULTS

Tumors were ≤pT1 in 21%, pT2 in 43%, and pT3/pT4 in 24% of patients. A median of 15 (IQR 8-22) LNs were removed at ILND. The overall pN+ rate was 24% and did not vary over the study period. The pN+ rate, stratified by pT stage, varied from 18-33%. On multivariable analysis, only higher tumor grade (OR 2.16; P = 0.02 for grade 2; OR 2.81; P = 0.005 for grade 3-4, versus grade 1) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 3.12; P <0.001) were independently associated with pN+ disease, whereas pT stage was not.

CONCLUSION

The contemporary rate of occult LN metastases in men with cN0 penile cancer remains high at approximately 24%. Our results suggest that high tumor grade and/or lymphovascular invasion are better determinants of lymph node involvement than primary tumor stage.

摘要

目的

(1)研究隐匿性腹股沟淋巴结转移的当代发生率,(2)确定隐匿性腹股沟淋巴结转移的预测因子,以改善 cN0 患者行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术(ILND)的选择。

方法

我们在 NCDB 中识别了 590 名接受部分/根治性阴茎切除术和 ILND 的 cTany cN0 cM0 阴茎癌男性患者,这些患者均来自 2006 年至 2016 年。我们检查了 pN+疾病的发生率,并构建了多变量回归模型来识别与 pN+疾病相关的特征。

结果

肿瘤 pT1 期患者占 21%,pT2 期患者占 43%,pT3/pT4 期患者占 24%。ILND 时中位数切除 15 个(IQR 8-22)个淋巴结。总体 pN+率为 24%,且在研究期间没有变化。根据 pT 分期分层,pN+率从 18%到 33%不等。多变量分析显示,仅肿瘤分级较高(OR 2.16;P=0.02 对于 2 级;OR 2.81;P=0.005 对于 3-4 级,与 1 级相比)和淋巴管侵犯(OR 3.12;P<0.001)与 pN+疾病独立相关,而 pT 分期则不然。

结论

cN0 阴茎癌男性隐匿性淋巴结转移的当代发生率仍高达约 24%。我们的结果表明,高肿瘤分级和/或淋巴管侵犯是淋巴结受累的更好预测因子,而不是原发肿瘤分期。

相似文献

1
Contemporary Incidence and Predictors of Occult Inguinal Lymph Node Metastases in Men With Clinically Node-negative (cN0) Penile Cancer.男性临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)阴茎癌隐匿性腹股沟淋巴结转移的当代发生率和预测因素。
Urology. 2021 Jul;153:221-227. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
2
Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.阴茎癌的淋巴结管理。
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.001.
3
Predictors of Nodal Upstaging in Clinical Node Negative Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.阴茎癌临床淋巴结阴性患者淋巴结分期上调的预测因素:一项国家癌症数据库分析
Urology. 2016 Oct;96:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.033. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Lymph node metastasis in intermediate-risk penile squamous cell cancer: a two-centre experience.中危阴茎鳞癌的淋巴结转移:两中心经验。
Eur Urol. 2010 Apr;57(4):688-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
5
Prognostic factors for occult inguinal lymph node involvement in penile carcinoma and assessment of the high-risk EAU subgroup: a two-institution analysis of 342 clinically node-negative patients.阴茎癌隐匿性腹股沟淋巴结受累的预后因素及高危 EAU 亚组评估:342 例临床淋巴结阴性患者的两机构分析。
Eur Urol. 2010 Nov;58(5):742-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
6
Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection vs. unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.临床 N1 期阴茎鳞癌行双侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与单侧腹股沟淋巴结清扫术联合动态前哨淋巴结活检术的比较
Urol Oncol. 2023 Apr;41(4):210.e1-210.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
7
Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.腹股沟淋巴结清扫术治疗具有淋巴结侵犯高风险的阴茎癌的长期随访。
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.025.
8
Clear-cell differentiation and lymphatic invasion, but not the revised TNM classification, predict lymph node metastases in pT1 penile cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 76 patients from a low incidence area.透明细胞分化和淋巴管浸润,但不是修订后的 TNM 分类,可预测低发地区 76 例 pT1 阴茎癌中的淋巴结转移:一项临床病理研究。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
9
Lymph node density predicts recurrence and death after inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.淋巴结密度可预测阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后的复发及死亡情况。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Jan;58(1):20-26. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.1.20. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Evaluation of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and palpable inguinal nodes.阴茎鳞状细胞癌伴可触及腹股沟淋巴结患者的动态前哨淋巴结活检评估
BJU Int. 2008 Aug;102(3):305-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07628.x. Epub 2008 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a staging system for hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach based on multicenter data: a retrospective cohort study.基于多中心数据的胃肝样腺癌分期系统的开发:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):718-727. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001768.
2
What would one of the greatest natural scientists and educators of the eighteenth century, Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, say about the current therapy management of patients with penile cancer?18世纪最伟大的自然科学家和教育家之一格奥尔格·克里斯托夫·利希滕贝格会如何看待阴茎癌患者目前的治疗管理呢?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct;148(10):2925-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04069-z. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
3
Prognostic predictors of lymph node metastasis in penile cancer: a systematic review.
阴茎癌淋巴结转移的预后预测因子:系统评价。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Sep-Oct;47(5):943-956. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0959.