Cabinet for Coordination and Studies, Secretary of State for Security. Ministry for Home Affairs, Spain.
Institute of Forensic and Security Sciences. Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), Spain.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP11761-NP11790. doi: 10.1177/0886260521997442. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Typological approaches in research of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) have been discussed on the basis of their validity and applicability in professional practice; yet most of the published studies on offender typologies are limited due to the use of relatively small, non-representative samples. The current study explored typologies of IPVAW perpetrators in a large-scale representative Spanish sample ( = 9,731 cases extracted from the Comprehensive Monitoring System of Gender-Based Violence Cases; VioGén System), according to classic batterer typologies proposed by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). To this end, the risk factors measured by the most extended Spanish police recidivism risk assessment tool (Valoración Policial del Riesgo; VPR) were used as clustering variables. Multiple correspondence analyses revealed the appropriateness of a bi-dimensional model to conceptualize IPVAW offender typologies. Our four-group solution may be described based on the levels of instability and antisociality of IPVAW offenders, as objectively measured by VPR5.0 risk indicators. Statistically significant differences between the IPVAW suggested typologies were found on all indicators, except for the presence of perpetrators younger than 24 years old and the presence of bidirectional intimate partner violence, which were equally distributed across the four groups. High instability/low antisociality (HiLa) and high instability/high antisociality (HiHa) individuals shared most risk indicators related to the aggressor's psychological instability; whereas HiHa and low instability/high antisociality (LiHa) men endorsed more antisociality indicators than statistically expected. The low instability/low antisociality (LiLa) group was characterized by the less presence of VPR risk indicators. Although the four subtypes identified in our study resembled classic typologies, we propose a new subtype, with high levels of instability and antisociality (i.e., HiHa). This work contributes to existing knowledge of the heterogeneity of these men, by providing useful typologies that can help inform prevention and treatment.
基于其在专业实践中的有效性和适用性,对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为(IPVAW)的类型学方法进行了讨论;然而,大多数关于罪犯类型学的已发表研究由于使用相对较小的、非代表性的样本而受到限制。本研究根据 Holtzworth-Munroe 和 Stuart(1994)提出的经典施虐者类型学,在一个大规模的代表性西班牙样本中(= 9731 例,从基于性别的暴力案件综合监测系统中提取;VioGén 系统)探索 IPVAW 犯罪者的类型学。为此,使用最广泛的西班牙警方累犯风险评估工具(Valoración Policial del Riesgo;VPR)测量的风险因素作为聚类变量。多元对应分析显示,二维模型适合概念化 IPVAW 犯罪者类型学。我们的四组解决方案可以根据 VPR5.0 风险指标客观测量的 IPVAW 犯罪者的不稳定性和反社会性水平来描述。在所提出的 IPVAW 建议类型学之间发现了所有指标的统计学显著差异,除了年龄在 24 岁以下的犯罪者和双向亲密伴侣暴力的存在,这两者在四个组中均匀分布。高不稳定性/低反社会性(HiLa)和高不稳定性/高反社会性(HiHa)个体具有与攻击者心理不稳定性相关的大多数风险指标;而 HiHa 和低不稳定性/高反社会性(LiHa)男性比统计预期的更多地认同反社会指标。低不稳定性/低反社会性(LiLa)组的特点是 VPR 风险指标的存在较少。虽然我们研究中确定的四个亚型类似于经典类型学,但我们提出了一个新的亚型,具有高水平的不稳定性和反社会性(即 HiHa)。这项工作通过提供有助于预防和治疗的有用类型学,为这些男性的异质性的现有知识做出了贡献。