• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术-在学习曲线期间导师计划对肿瘤学结果的影响。

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy-impact of a mentorship program on oncological outcomes during the learning curve.

机构信息

Department of Urology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;191(1):479-484. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02556-9. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-021-02556-9
PMID:33638797
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The learning curve for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is estimated to be about 50-200 cases. This study will evaluate the benefit of a mentorship programme after completing a mini-fellowship in RARP by an experienced surgeon who previously trained in open and laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Our study was a retrospective comparative analysis of RARP performed by a single consultant urologist. A retrospective chart review of the first 120 cases was performed. The 120 patients were divided into three groups of 40 cases. For the first 40 cases, an appropriately qualified mentor was present. The peri-operative and oncological outcomes were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

Operative times significantly decreased with experience (250 min vs 234 min vs 225 min, p < 0.05). Complication rates, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were similar between all groups. There was a higher rate of positive margins in the final group (20% vs 17.5% vs 32.5%, p < 0.5). There was a greater number of pT3 tumours in group 3 (42%, n = 17) compared to groups 1 and 2 (20%, n = 8, and 22.5%, n = 9) which may account for the higher rate of positive margins in this group.

CONCLUSION

In the transition of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon to robotic surgery, we showed that there is a benefit of a mentorship programme after a mini-fellowship in reducing the impact of the learning curve on patient outcomes. Ongoing mentorship may be of benefit in cases where a high volume of tumour is suspected and should be avoided in the early part of the learning curve to maximise oncological outcomes.

摘要

背景与目的

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的学习曲线估计约为 50-200 例。本研究将评估一位经验丰富的外科医生在完成开放和腹腔镜手术培训后的迷你研究员培训后,通过指导计划获得的益处。

方法

我们的研究是对一位顾问泌尿科医生进行的 RARP 的回顾性比较分析。对前 120 例进行了回顾性图表审查。这 120 名患者分为三组,每组 40 例。对于前 40 例,有一位合格的导师在场。比较了三组之间的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。

结果

手术时间随经验的增加而显著减少(250 分钟比 234 分钟比 225 分钟,p < 0.05)。并发症发生率、估计失血量和住院时间在所有组之间相似。最后一组的阳性边缘率较高(20%比 17.5%比 32.5%,p < 0.5)。第 3 组(42%,n = 17)有更多的 pT3 肿瘤,而第 1 组和第 2 组(20%,n = 8 和 22.5%,n = 9),这可能是该组阳性边缘率较高的原因。

结论

在经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生向机器人手术过渡的过程中,我们表明迷你研究员培训后的指导计划在减少学习曲线对患者结果的影响方面是有益的。在学习曲线的早期,应该避免在高肿瘤量的情况下进行持续指导,以最大限度地提高肿瘤学结果。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy-impact of a mentorship program on oncological outcomes during the learning curve.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术-在学习曲线期间导师计划对肿瘤学结果的影响。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;191(1):479-484. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02556-9. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.微创根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:肿瘤学结局的综合评估与累积求和分析
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):149.e1-149.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.015. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
3
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.腹腔镜与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:澳大利亚单中心单术者系列研究
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Mar;85(3):154-8. doi: 10.1111/ans.12602. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
4
Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?床边助手的经验是否会影响机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术学习曲线上机器人外科医生的结果?
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):54-60. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0184.
5
Adding a newly trained surgeon into a high-volume robotic prostatectomy group: are outcomes compromised?将一名新培训的外科医生纳入高容量机器人前列腺切除术团队:手术效果会受到影响吗?
J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):69-74. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0615-7. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy learning curve for experienced laparoscopic surgeons: does it really exist?经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线:它真的存在吗?
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):83-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0485.
7
A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve and Postlearning Curve Outcomes of Two Experience- and Volume-Matched Surgeons for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.两名经验和手术量匹配的外科医生进行腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的学习曲线及术后学习曲线结果的批判性分析。
J Endourol. 2015 Aug;29(8):939-47. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0810. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
8
Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.机器人根治性前列腺切除术在长期学习曲线后可实现优越的生化复发和长期生活质量结局——2206 例连续病例的前瞻性单外科医生队列的更新分析。
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):664-671. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.035. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
9
A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures.一项比较研究,纳入 10790 名接受过高度训练的外科医生进行机器人辅助和开放根治性前列腺切除术的男性,两组手术均为这些外科医生进行。
BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1031-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14760. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.经验对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘和生化复发风险的影响:学习曲线研究。
J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):108-113. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000147. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the surgeon's learning curve impact pentafecta outcomes in radical prostatectomy? a systematic review and meta-analysis.外科医生的学习曲线是否会影响根治性前列腺切除术的五项完美指标结果?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2025 May 7;25(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01810-x.
2
The learning curve for robotic living donor right hepatectomy: Analysis of outcomes in 2 specialized centers.机器人活体供体右半肝切除术的学习曲线:两个专业中心的结果分析
Liver Transpl. 2025 Feb 1;31(2):190-200. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000480. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
3
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Trifecta Learning Curve for Surgeons with Previous Experience in Laparoscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
The Learning Curve Does Not Affect Positive Surgical Margin Status in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.学习曲线不影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的手术切缘阳性状态。
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):333-338. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4426.
2
Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的学习曲线:一项对3794例患者的多机构研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2011 Sep;63(3):191-8.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)学习曲线三要素:腹腔镜手术经验丰富的外科医生
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 24;60(7):1032. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071032.
4
Value-Based Health Care for Prostate Cancer Centers by Implementing Specific Key Performance Indicators Using a Balanced Score Card.通过使用平衡计分卡实施特定关键绩效指标,为前列腺癌中心提供基于价值的医疗保健。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 11;12(10):991. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12100991.
5
CUSUM learning curves: what they can and can't tell us.CUSUM 学习曲线:它们能告诉我们什么,不能告诉我们什么。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7991-7999. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10252-1. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
6
Development and validation of a deep learning-based algorithm for colonoscopy quality assessment.基于深度学习的结肠镜检查质量评估算法的开发和验证。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6446-6455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08993-y. Epub 2022 Feb 7.