Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany.
Audiovisual Media Center, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 27;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02569-z.
Local anaesthesia plays a key role in many aspects of a dentist's work. The required skills to perform anaesthesia successfully are acquired at university. To take advantage of the possibilities for new teaching formats, a blended learning concept for the local anaesthesia course was developed. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of face-to-face, blended and e-learning in teaching in local anaesthesia by assessing students' knowledge gain, performance of practical skills and satisfaction with the course.
All participants (n = 37) were randomly allocated into three groups. After acquiring the theoretical background in the blended learning, e-learning or lecture groups, a test to assess knowledge gain was performed. The performance of the practical skills was assessed in a small-group seminar. Student attitudes were evaluated with a questionnaire.
The blended group showed significantly better results (mean = 17, SD =1.5) in theoretical knowledge gain than the other two groups (e-learning group: mean = 14.7, SD = 2.2; lecture group: mean = 14.8, SD =2.3). When comparing the results of the clinical skills assessment, there was no significant difference among all three groups (p > 0.017). The participants confirmed a high overall satisfaction with the course, in particular with the blended learning approach.
This study indicates that blended learning improves the learning outcome for theoretical knowledge in teaching local anaesthesia more than either face-to-face learning or e-learning alone. Furthermore, the blended learning approach is highly appreciated by the students. For acquiring practical skills, this study shows that blended learning is as effective as other teaching methods.
局部麻醉在牙医工作的许多方面都起着关键作用。成功实施麻醉所需的技能是在大学获得的。为了利用新教学形式的可能性,开发了局部麻醉课程的混合学习概念。本研究的目的是通过评估学生的知识获取、实践技能表现和对课程的满意度,比较面授、混合和电子学习在局部麻醉教学中的效果。
所有参与者(n=37)均随机分配到三组。在混合学习、电子学习或讲座组中获得理论背景后,进行了一项测试以评估知识获取。在小组研讨会上评估了实践技能的表现。通过问卷调查评估学生的态度。
混合组在理论知识获取方面的成绩(均值=17,标准差=1.5)明显优于其他两组(电子学习组:均值=14.7,标准差=2.2;讲座组:均值=14.8,标准差=2.3)。当比较临床技能评估结果时,三组之间没有显著差异(p>0.017)。参与者对课程的整体满意度很高,特别是对混合学习方法的满意度。
本研究表明,与面授学习或电子学习单独相比,混合学习更能提高局部麻醉教学中理论知识的学习效果。此外,学生非常赞赏混合学习方法。对于获得实践技能,本研究表明混合学习与其他教学方法一样有效。