• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿麻醉培训中察觉到的学习差距:一项横断面调查。

Perceived learning gaps in paediatric anaesthesia training: A cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

Devi Vasudha, Pallath Vinod, Gayathri Balasubramaniam, Patil Shantanu S

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Department of Medical Education and Assessment, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;69(4):386-392. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_807_24. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_807_24
PMID:40687964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12275217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Paediatric anaesthesia requires specialised skills to manage patients effectively, yet training often falls short of clinical needs. To address this, a survey was conducted among anaesthesia trainees and teachers to identify perceived learning gaps.

METHODS

A self-administered Google questionnaire was used to gather input on teaching and learning paediatric anaesthesia. Faculty and anaesthesia trainees answered 29 questions, organised into multiple sections. Data were analysed using Jeffreys Amazing Statistical Package (JASP) version 0.16.3 Arnhem; Netherlands.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was sent to 567 participants, yielding a 25.30% response rate, with 144 participants responding. Exposure to paediatric anaesthesia had a median score of 3 (good). The opportunity for performing tasks was moderate, at 40%-60%, with 47% of respondents primarily assisting rather than performing tasks. Elective placements in paediatric operating theatres were reported by 25% of students in the first 6 months, 38.19% in the second 6 months, and 36.81% during the second year. Tasks were carried out under direct proactive supervision. A positive correlation was found between mask ventilation and intubation skills, with the highest 'r' value (0.714), indicating that more opportunities for mask ventilation increased the chances for intubation. Teaching methods included interactive lectures for knowledge, hands-on practice for skills, and mentoring for the affective domain. Only 19% of respondents were exposed to children under 1 year.

CONCLUSION

The reliance on direct proactive supervision for procedural skill training until the completion of the postgraduate anaesthesia program is concerning. This highlights the need for a curriculum that prioritises skill development, incorporating entrustment goals, suitable teaching methods, and workplace assessments.

摘要

背景与目的

小儿麻醉需要专业技能来有效管理患者,但培训往往无法满足临床需求。为解决这一问题,对麻醉实习生和教师进行了一项调查,以确定他们认为的学习差距。

方法

使用一份自行填写的谷歌问卷收集有关小儿麻醉教学与学习的意见。教员和麻醉实习生回答了29个问题,这些问题分为多个部分。使用荷兰阿纳姆杰弗里斯神奇统计软件包(JASP)0.16.3版对数据进行分析。

结果

问卷发送给了567名参与者,回复率为25.30%,有144名参与者回复。小儿麻醉的接触程度中位数得分为3(良好)。执行任务的机会适中,为40%-60%,47%的受访者主要是协助而非执行任务。25%的学生在前6个月、38.19%在第二个6个月、36.81%在第二年报告了在小儿手术室的选择性实习安排。任务是在直接主动监督下进行的。面罩通气和插管技能之间存在正相关,“r”值最高为0.714,表明更多的面罩通气机会增加了插管的可能性。教学方法包括知识方面的互动讲座、技能方面的实践操作以及情感领域的指导。只有19%的受访者接触过1岁以下儿童。

结论

在研究生麻醉课程完成之前,程序技能培训依赖直接主动监督令人担忧。这凸显了需要一门优先考虑技能发展的课程,纳入委托目标、合适的教学方法和工作场所评估。

相似文献

1
Perceived learning gaps in paediatric anaesthesia training: A cross-sectional survey.小儿麻醉培训中察觉到的学习差距:一项横断面调查。
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;69(4):386-392. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_807_24. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children attending for elective surgery under general anaesthesia: the MAGIC non-inferiority RCT.褪黑素与咪达唑仑用于择期全身麻醉手术患儿术前用药的比较:MAGIC非劣效性随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(29):1-25. doi: 10.3310/CWKF1987.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat.虚拟现实训练以提高耳鼻喉科手术所需技能。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 9;2015(9):CD010198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010198.pub2.
9
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
10
Learning together for mental health: feasibility of measures to assess a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention in secondary schools.共同学习促进心理健康:评估中学全校心理健康与幸福干预措施的可行性
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 25:1-18. doi: 10.3310/GFDT2323.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating competency-based medical education: a systematized review of current practices.基于能力的医学教育评估:当前实践的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05609-6.
2
Trends and patterns in blended learning research (1965-2022).混合式学习研究的趋势与模式(1965 - 2022年)
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Apr 3:1-32. doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11754-0.
3
Impact of number of critical care procedural skill repetitions on supervision level and teaching style.重复进行重症监护程序技能的次数对监管级别和教学风格的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280207. eCollection 2023.
4
Development and consensus of entrustable professional activities for final-year medical students in anaesthesiology.麻醉学专业住院医师规范化培训中可委托的专业活动的制定与共识。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 29;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01668-8.
5
Learning effects of virtual versus high-fidelity simulations in nursing students: a crossover comparison.虚拟模拟与高保真模拟对护生的学习效果:一项交叉比较研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 27;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00878-2.
6
Feasibility study of cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis as a competency assessment tool for ultrasound-guided venous access procedures.累积和 (CUSUM) 分析作为超声引导下静脉穿刺术能力评估工具的可行性研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;69(2):256-264. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02149-1. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
7
Low-cost versus high-fidelity pediatric simulators for difficult airway management training: a randomized study in continuing medical education.低成本与高保真儿科模拟器在困难气道管理培训中的比较:一项继续医学教育中的随机研究。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 May-Jun;73(3):250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
Development of entrustable professional activities for paediatric intensive care fellows: A national modified Delphi study.儿科重症监护住院医师可委托专业活动的制定:一项全国性改良德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248565. eCollection 2021.
9
Effectiveness of face-to-face, blended and e-learning in teaching the application of local anaesthesia: a randomised study.面对面教学、混合式教学和电子学习在局部麻醉应用教学中的效果比较:一项随机研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 27;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02569-z.
10
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of competency-based medical education in anaesthesia.基于能力的医学教育在麻醉学中的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):748-760. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.10.025. Epub 2020 Jan 31.