Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Mar;49(3):319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.020.
Published bundles to reduce Clostridioides difficile Infection (CDI) frequently lack information on compliance with individual elements. We piloted a computerized clinical decision support-based intervention bundle and conducted detailed evaluation of several intervention-related measures.
A quasi-experimental study of a bundled intervention was performed at 2 acute care community hospitals in Maryland. The bundle had five components: (1) timely placement in enteric precautions, (2) appropriate CDI testing, (3) reducing proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, (4) reducing high-CDI risk antibiotic use, and (5) optimizing use of a sporicidal agent for environmental cleaning. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare measure differences. An interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate impact on hospital-onset (HO)-CDI.
Placement of CDI suspects in enteric precautions before test results did not change. Only hospital B decreased the frequency of CDI testing and reduced inappropriate testing related to laxative use. Both hospitals reduced the use of PPI and high-risk antibiotics. A 75% decrease in HO-CDI immediately postimplementation was observed for hospital B only.
A CDI reduction bundle showed variable impact on relevant measures. Hospital-specific differential uptake of bundle elements may explain differences in effectiveness, and emphasizes the importance of measuring processes and intermediate outcomes.
已发表的减少艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的捆绑包通常缺乏关于个别元素依从性的信息。我们试点了一个基于计算机临床决策支持的干预捆绑包,并对几个与干预相关的措施进行了详细评估。
在马里兰州的两家急性护理社区医院进行了捆绑干预的准实验研究。捆绑包有五个组成部分:(1)及时采取肠道预防措施,(2)适当的 CDI 检测,(3)减少质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用,(4)减少高 CDI 风险抗生素的使用,(5)优化环境清洁用杀菌剂的使用。使用卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验比较措施差异。使用中断时间序列分析评估对医院获得性(HO)-CDI 的影响。
在检测结果之前,将 CDI 疑似患者安置在肠道预防措施中的做法没有改变。只有医院 B 减少了 CDI 检测的频率,并减少了与泻药使用相关的不适当检测。两家医院都减少了 PPI 和高风险抗生素的使用。仅在医院 B 观察到实施后立即出现 75%的 HO-CDI 减少。
CDI 减少捆绑包对相关措施显示出不同的影响。捆绑包要素在医院间的差异吸收可能解释了效果的差异,并强调了测量过程和中间结果的重要性。