• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管切除术后吻合口漏:国际 Delphi 共识研究的研究重点。

Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy: research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2021 Jan 27;108(1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa034.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znaa034
PMID:33640931
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international collaborative group set up to study anastomotic leak outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. This Delphi study aimed to prioritize future research areas of unmet clinical need in RCTs to reduce anastomotic leaks.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was overseen by the OGAA committee, national leads, and engaged clinicians from high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). A three-stage iterative process was used to prioritize research topics, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), and two rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3) addressing research priority and ability to recruit. Stratified analyses were performed by country income.

RESULTS

In stage 1, the steering committee proposed research topics across six domains: preoperative optimization, surgical oncology, technical approach, anastomotic technique, enhanced recovery and nutrition, and management of leaks. In stages 2 and stage 3, 192 and 171 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Prioritized research topics include prehabilitation, anastomotic technique, and timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Stratified analyses by country income demonstrated no significant differences in research priorities between HICs and LMICs. However, for ability to recruit, there were significant differences between LMICs and HICs for themes related to the technical approach (minimally invasive, width of gastric tube, ischaemic preconditioning) and location of the anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

Several areas of research priority are consistent across LMICs and HICs, but discrepancies in ability to recruit by country income will inform future study design.

摘要

背景

食管胃吻合口漏(OGAA)是一个国际协作组,旨在研究癌症患者食管切除术后吻合口漏的结果。这项德尔菲研究旨在确定未来需要进行随机对照试验(RCT)以减少吻合口漏的研究领域,这些研究领域是满足临床需求的,但目前尚未得到满足。

方法

OGAA 委员会、国家负责人以及高收入国家(HIC)和中低收入国家(LMIC)的参与临床医生对修改后的德尔菲法进行了监督。使用三阶段迭代过程来确定研究课题的优先级,包括范围广泛的系统评价(第 1 阶段)和两轮匿名电子投票(第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段),以解决研究重点和招募能力问题。分层分析按国家收入进行。

结果

在第 1 阶段,指导委员会提出了六个领域的研究课题:术前优化、外科肿瘤学、技术方法、吻合技术、加速康复和营养以及漏管的管理。在第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段,分别有 192 名和 171 名受访者参与了在线投票。优先研究课题包括康复前治疗、吻合技术和新辅助化疗(放疗)后手术时机。按国家收入分层分析表明,HIC 和 LMIC 之间的研究重点没有显著差异。然而,在招募能力方面,技术方法(微创、胃管宽度、缺血预处理)和吻合部位主题方面,LMIC 和 HIC 之间存在显著差异。

结论

LMIC 和 HIC 之间存在一些研究重点一致的领域,但按国家收入划分的招募能力差异将为未来的研究设计提供信息。

相似文献

1
Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy: research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study.食管切除术后吻合口漏:国际 Delphi 共识研究的研究重点。
Br J Surg. 2021 Jan 27;108(1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa034.
2
International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).国际上施行食管癌切除术的单位的手术操作差异:来自食管胃吻合口质量评估(OGAA)的单位调查。
World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2874-2884. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05080-1.
3
Does preoperative ischaemic conditioning with gastric vessel ligation reduce anastomotic leaks in oesophagectomy?胃血管结扎术前缺血预处理能否减少食管切除术中的吻合口漏?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):121-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu070. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
4
Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management of Chyle Leak Following Esophagectomy for Cancers: An International Consensus Statement.食管癌切除术后乳糜漏的危险因素、诊断与管理:一项国际共识声明
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Aug 29;3(3):e192. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000192. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA).食管胃吻合口漏和吻合口处导管坏死的预测因素:来自食管胃吻合口审计(OGAA)的结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;50(6):107983. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107983. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
6
Prioritizing research for patients requiring surgery in low- and middle-income countries.优先为中低收入国家需要手术的患者开展研究。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e113-e120. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11037.
7
Study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study on esophagogastric anastomoses and anastomotic leak (the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit/OGAA).多中心前瞻性队列研究食管胃吻合术和吻合口漏的研究方案(食管胃吻合口评估/OGAA)。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jan 16;33(1). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz007.
8
Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).国际食管胃吻合口评估(OGAA)、食管切除术并发症共识小组(ECCG)和荷兰上消化道癌评估(DUCA)的短期结果比较。
BJS Open. 2021 May 7;5(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab010.
9
Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.微创McKeown食管切除术吻合口漏的术前危险因素及术后指标评估:单中心回顾性分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Feb 28;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0864-4.
10
Critical appraisal of gastric conduit ischaemic conditioning (GIC) prior to oesophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胃管缺血预处理(GIC)在食管癌术前的评价:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2020 May;77:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Malignant Nodal Involvement in Early Esophago-Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results From the Multicenter Retrospective Congress Study (endosCopic resectiON, esophaGectomy or Gastrectomy for Early Esophagogastric Cancers).早期食管胃腺癌恶性淋巴结受累的患病率及危险因素:多中心回顾性国会研究(早期食管胃癌的内镜切除、食管切除术或胃切除术)结果
Ann Surg. 2025 Mar 1;281(3):363-370. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006496. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
Management of anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术伴胸内吻合术后吻合口漏的处理。
Dis Esophagus. 2023 May 27;36(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac094.
3
Consequences of anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center experience.
微创食管切除术后吻合口漏的后果:单中心经验
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Nov 17;11:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.002. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management of Chyle Leak Following Esophagectomy for Cancers: An International Consensus Statement.食管癌切除术后乳糜漏的危险因素、诊断与管理:一项国际共识声明
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Aug 29;3(3):e192. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000192. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Circular vs. linear stapling after minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy: a pooled analysis.微创和机器人辅助食管手术后的圆形吻合与线性吻合:汇总分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):1831-1838. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02590-w. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Treatment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: insights of an international case vignette survey and expert discussions.食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的治疗:国际病例 vignette 调查和专家讨论的见解。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Dec 14;35(12). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac020.
7
Using Social Media to Engage Knowledge Users in Health Research Priority Setting: Scoping Review.利用社交媒体吸引知识用户参与健康研究重点制定:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 21;24(2):e29821. doi: 10.2196/29821.