Suppr超能文献

食管切除术后吻合口漏:国际 Delphi 共识研究的研究重点。

Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy: research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2021 Jan 27;108(1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa034.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international collaborative group set up to study anastomotic leak outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. This Delphi study aimed to prioritize future research areas of unmet clinical need in RCTs to reduce anastomotic leaks.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was overseen by the OGAA committee, national leads, and engaged clinicians from high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). A three-stage iterative process was used to prioritize research topics, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), and two rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3) addressing research priority and ability to recruit. Stratified analyses were performed by country income.

RESULTS

In stage 1, the steering committee proposed research topics across six domains: preoperative optimization, surgical oncology, technical approach, anastomotic technique, enhanced recovery and nutrition, and management of leaks. In stages 2 and stage 3, 192 and 171 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Prioritized research topics include prehabilitation, anastomotic technique, and timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Stratified analyses by country income demonstrated no significant differences in research priorities between HICs and LMICs. However, for ability to recruit, there were significant differences between LMICs and HICs for themes related to the technical approach (minimally invasive, width of gastric tube, ischaemic preconditioning) and location of the anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

Several areas of research priority are consistent across LMICs and HICs, but discrepancies in ability to recruit by country income will inform future study design.

摘要

背景

食管胃吻合口漏(OGAA)是一个国际协作组,旨在研究癌症患者食管切除术后吻合口漏的结果。这项德尔菲研究旨在确定未来需要进行随机对照试验(RCT)以减少吻合口漏的研究领域,这些研究领域是满足临床需求的,但目前尚未得到满足。

方法

OGAA 委员会、国家负责人以及高收入国家(HIC)和中低收入国家(LMIC)的参与临床医生对修改后的德尔菲法进行了监督。使用三阶段迭代过程来确定研究课题的优先级,包括范围广泛的系统评价(第 1 阶段)和两轮匿名电子投票(第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段),以解决研究重点和招募能力问题。分层分析按国家收入进行。

结果

在第 1 阶段,指导委员会提出了六个领域的研究课题:术前优化、外科肿瘤学、技术方法、吻合技术、加速康复和营养以及漏管的管理。在第 2 阶段和第 3 阶段,分别有 192 名和 171 名受访者参与了在线投票。优先研究课题包括康复前治疗、吻合技术和新辅助化疗(放疗)后手术时机。按国家收入分层分析表明,HIC 和 LMIC 之间的研究重点没有显著差异。然而,在招募能力方面,技术方法(微创、胃管宽度、缺血预处理)和吻合部位主题方面,LMIC 和 HIC 之间存在显著差异。

结论

LMIC 和 HIC 之间存在一些研究重点一致的领域,但按国家收入划分的招募能力差异将为未来的研究设计提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验