Suppr超能文献

基于地理、生态和历史气候稳定性的中心-边缘方法:是什么解释了 Bulnesia sarmientoi 形态特征的变化?

Centre-periphery approaches based on geography, ecology and historical climate stability: what explains the variation in morphological traits of Bulnesia sarmientoi?

机构信息

Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales (IFRGV), CIAP, INTA, Córdoba, Argentina.

Laboratorio de Ecología Evolutiva - Biología Floral, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV), CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield, Córdoba, Argentina.

出版信息

Ann Bot. 2021 Jun 24;127(7):943-955. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcab034.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The centre-periphery hypothesis posits that higher species performance is expected in geographic and ecological centres rather than in peripheral populations. However, this is not the commonly found pattern; therefore, alternative approaches, including the historical dimension of species geographical ranges, should be explored. Morphological functional traits are fundamental determinants of species performance, commonly related to environmental stability and productivity. We tested whether or not historical processes may have shaped variations in tree and leaf traits of the Chaco tree Bulnesia sarmientoi.

METHODS

Morphological variation patterns were analysed from three centre-periphery approaches: geographical, ecological and historical. Tree (stem and canopy) and leaf (leaf size and specific leaf area) traits were measured in 24 populations across the species range. A principal component analysis was performed on morphological traits to obtain synthetic variables. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test which of the implemented centre-periphery approaches significantly explained trait spatial patterns.

KEY RESULTS

The patterns retrieved from the three centre-periphery approaches were not concordant. The historical approach revealed that trees were shorter in centre populations than in the periphery. Significant differences in leaf traits were observed between the geographical centre and the periphery, mainly due to low specific leaf area values towards the geographical centre. We did not find any pattern associated with the ecological centre-periphery approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The decoupled response between leaf and tree traits suggests that these sets of traits respond differently to processes occurring at different times. The geographical and historical approaches showed centres with extreme environments in relation to their respective peripheries, but the historical centre has also been a climatically stable area since the Last Glacial Maximum. The historical approach allowed for the recovery of historical processes underlying variation in tree traits, highlighting that centre-periphery delimitations should be based on a multi-approach framework.

摘要

背景与目的

中心-边缘假说认为,较高的物种表现预期在地理和生态中心,而不是在边缘种群中。然而,这并不是常见的模式;因此,应该探索替代方法,包括物种地理范围的历史维度。形态功能特征是物种表现的基本决定因素,通常与环境稳定性和生产力有关。我们测试了历史进程是否可能塑造了查科树 Bulnesia sarmientoi 的树木和叶片特征的变异。

方法

从地理、生态和历史三个中心-边缘方法分析形态变异模式。在物种分布范围内的 24 个种群中测量了树木(茎和树冠)和叶片(叶片大小和比叶面积)特征。对形态特征进行主成分分析,以获得综合变量。使用线性混合效应模型来测试实施的中心-边缘方法中哪一个显著解释了特征的空间模式。

主要结果

从三个中心-边缘方法中得出的模式不一致。历史方法表明,中心种群的树木比边缘种群的树木短。在地理中心和边缘之间观察到叶片特征存在显著差异,主要是由于地理中心的比叶面积值较低。我们没有发现与生态中心-边缘方法相关的任何模式。

结论

叶片和树木特征之间的分离反应表明,这两组特征对不同时间发生的过程有不同的反应。地理和历史方法显示,中心与边缘的环境极端,但历史中心自末次冰期以来也是一个气候稳定的地区。历史方法允许恢复树木特征变化背后的历史进程,突出表明中心-边缘的划定应该基于多方法框架。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验