• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用引流淀粉酶水平检测食管切除术后吻合口漏的早期发现。

Early detection of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy using drain amylase levels.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi‑ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431‑3192, Japan.

Department of Perioperative Functioning Care and Support, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi‑ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 431‑3192, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2021 Jul;18(3):522-528. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00827-z. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10388-021-00827-z
PMID:33641017
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy is essential to minimize postoperative complications. In this study, we hypothesized that drain amylase levels may be useful for early AL detection, and measuring drain amylase levels could reduce severe postoperative AL incidence. We, therefore, analyzed the usefulness of measuring drain fluid amylase levels after esophagectomy, in esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

From January 2016 to March 2020, 134 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgical resection with esophagogastric anastomosis in the cervical region were included. The patients were divided into a group whose cervical drain fluid amylase levels were not measured (No-AMY Group) and a group whose cervical drain fluid amylase levels were measured daily until postoperative day (POD) 7 (AMY Group). The incidence of severe AL was compared between groups. In the AMY Group, we also investigated the association between AL and drain amylase levels.

RESULTS

Drain amylase levels were significantly higher in AL-positive cases than in AL-negative cases (P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed the drain amylase level cut-off value for AL diagnosis was 1800 U/L on POD 2 (Area under the curve = 0.835; P = 0.027). The incidence of ≥ grade III AL was significantly lower in the AMY Group than in the No-AMY Group (2 vs. 10%, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical drain fluid amylase levels can be a useful screening method for early detection of AL after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and may help reduce incidence of severe postoperative AL.

摘要

背景

食管癌手术后早期诊断吻合口漏(AL)对于最大限度减少术后并发症至关重要。在本研究中,我们假设引流淀粉酶水平可能有助于早期 AL 的检测,并且测量引流淀粉酶水平可以降低严重术后 AL 的发生率。因此,我们分析了测量食管癌手术后引流液淀粉酶水平的有用性。

方法

从 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月,共有 134 例接受颈段食管胃吻合术的食管癌患者纳入本研究。患者分为未测量颈引流液淀粉酶水平组(No-AMY 组)和每日测量颈引流液淀粉酶水平至术后第 7 天组(AMY 组)。比较两组严重 AL 的发生率。在 AMY 组中,我们还研究了 AL 与引流淀粉酶水平之间的关系。

结果

AL 阳性组的引流淀粉酶水平明显高于 AL 阴性组(P<0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,术后第 2 天诊断 AL 的引流淀粉酶水平截断值为 1800 U/L(曲线下面积 0.835;P=0.027)。AMY 组的≥Ⅲ级 AL 发生率明显低于 No-AMY 组(2%比 10%,P=0.047)。

结论

颈引流液淀粉酶水平可以作为食管癌手术后早期检测 AL 的有用筛查方法,可能有助于降低严重术后 AL 的发生率。

相似文献

1
Early detection of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy using drain amylase levels.使用引流淀粉酶水平检测食管切除术后吻合口漏的早期发现。
Esophagus. 2021 Jul;18(3):522-528. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00827-z. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
2
Diagnostic value of drain amylase for detecting intrathoracic leakage after esophagectomy.引流液淀粉酶对食管癌切除术后胸内漏的诊断价值
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9118-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9118.
3
Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.微创McKeown食管切除术吻合口漏的术前危险因素及术后指标评估:单中心回顾性分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Feb 28;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0864-4.
4
C-reactive protein and drain amylase: their utility in ruling out anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.C 反应蛋白和引流淀粉酶:在微创 Ivor-Lewis 食管切除术之后,用于排除吻合口漏的应用价值。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023 May;58(5):448-452. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2141076. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Prognostic Value of Chest-Tube Amylase Versus C-Reactive Protein as Screening Tool for Detection of Early Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.胸管淀粉酶与C反应蛋白作为Ivor Lewis食管切除术后早期吻合口漏检测筛查工具的预后价值
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):192-197. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0656. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Drain Amylase: A Simple and Versatile Method of Detecting Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks.引流淀粉酶:一种检测食管吻合口漏的简单而通用的方法。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun;113(6):1794-1800. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.062. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
7
Serial Drain Amylase Can Accurately Detect Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy and May Facilitate Early Discharge.连续引流淀粉酶可准确检测食管癌切除术后吻合口漏,并可能有助于早期出院。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2041-6; discussion 2046-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.05.092. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
8
Perianastomotic drainage in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, does habit affect utility? An 11-year single-center experience.Ivor-Lewis 食管癌根治术中吻合口周围引流,习惯是否影响其应用价值?一项 11 年单中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2020 Mar;72(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00674-9. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
9
Abdominal Drainage and Amylase Measurement for Detection of Leakage After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.胃癌胃切除术后引流和淀粉酶测量检测漏的价值。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jul;22(7):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3789-7. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
A risk scoring system for early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.一种用于食管癌次全切除术后吻合口漏早期诊断的风险评分系统。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 4;53(10):936-941. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad072.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Prophylactic Cervical Drainage Effective in Patients Undergoing McKeown Esophagectomy Reconstructed Through the Retrosternal Route with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy?预防性颈引流在经胸骨后入路行二野淋巴结清扫的 McKeown 食管癌切除术患者中是否有效?
World J Surg. 2022 Aug;46(8):1944-1951. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06578-x. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection.引流液中的淀粉酶用于诊断胰腺切除术后的胰瘘。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 7;4(4):CD012009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012009.pub2.