Department of Pharmacology, University of the Basque Country (EHU/UPV), Barrio Sarriena s/n, ES48940, Leioa, Biscay, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Pharmacol Rep. 2021 Aug;73(4):1122-1135. doi: 10.1007/s43440-021-00240-4. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
Alpha-adrenergic (α-AR) and cannabinoid CB (CB-R) receptors exert their functions modulating multiple signaling pathways, including MEK-ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinases) and FADD (Fas-associated protein with death domain) cascades. These molecules are relevant in finding biased agonists with fewer side effects, but the mechanisms involving their modulations by α-AR- and CB-R in vivo are unclear. This study investigated the roles of Gαi and Gαz proteins in mediating α-AR- and CB-R-induced alterations of MEK-ERK and FADD phosphorylation (p-) in mouse brain cortex.
Gαi or Gαz protein knockdown was induced in mice with selective antisense oligodeoxinucleotides (ODNs; 3 nmol/day, 5 days) prior to UK-14,304 (UK or brimonidine; 1 mg/kg) or WIN55212-2 (WIN; 8 mg/kg) acute treatments. Inactivated (p-T) MEK1, activated (p-S) MEK1/2, activated (p-T/Y) ERK1/2, p-S FADD, and the corresponding total forms of these proteins were quantified by immunoblotting.
Increased (+ 88%) p-T MEK1 cortical density, with a concomitant reduction (-43%) of activated ERK was observed in UK-treated mice. Both effects were attenuated by Gαi or Gαz antisense ODNs. Contrastingly, WIN induced Gαi- and Gαz-independent upregulations of p-T MEK1 (+ 63%), p-S MEK1/2 (+ 86%), and activated ERK (+ 111%) in brain. Pro-apoptotic FADD was downregulated (- 34 to 39%) following UK and WIN administration, whereas the neuroprotective p-S FADD was increased (+ 74%) in WIN-treated mice only. None of these latter effects required from Gαi or Gαz protein integrity.
The results indicate that α-AR (UK), but not CB-R (WIN), agonists use Gαi and Gαz proteins to modulate MEK-ERK, but not FADD, pathway in mouse brain cortex.
α-肾上腺素能 (α-AR) 和大麻素 CB (CB-R) 受体通过调节多条信号通路发挥作用,包括 MEK-ERK(细胞外信号调节激酶)和 FADD(含死亡域的 Fas 相关蛋白)级联。这些分子在寻找副作用较少的偏激动剂方面具有重要意义,但 α-AR 和 CB-R 在体内调节这些分子的机制尚不清楚。本研究探讨了 Gαi 和 Gαz 蛋白在介导 α-AR 和 CB-R 诱导的小鼠大脑皮质中 MEK-ERK 和 FADD 磷酸化 (p-) 改变中的作用。
使用选择性反义寡核苷酸 (ODN;3 nmol/天,5 天) 在 UK-14,304 (UK 或溴莫尼定;1 mg/kg) 或 WIN55212-2 (WIN;8 mg/kg) 急性处理之前诱导小鼠中的 Gαi 或 Gαz 蛋白敲低。通过免疫印迹定量测定失活 (p-T) MEK1、激活 (p-S) MEK1/2、激活 (p-T/Y) ERK1/2、p-S FADD 以及这些蛋白的相应总形式。
在 UK 处理的小鼠中,观察到皮质中 p-T MEK1 密度增加(+88%),同时激活的 ERK 减少(-43%)。这两种作用均被 Gαi 或 Gαz 反义 ODN 减弱。相反,WIN 诱导了脑内 Gαi 和 Gαz 不依赖的 p-T MEK1(+63%)、p-S MEK1/2(+86%)和激活的 ERK(+111%)上调。UK 和 WIN 给药后,促凋亡 FADD 下调(-34 至 39%),而 WIN 处理的小鼠中仅增加了神经保护性 p-S FADD(+74%)。这些后续作用均不需要 Gαi 或 Gαz 蛋白的完整性。
结果表明,α-AR(UK)激动剂而非 CB-R(WIN)激动剂使用 Gαi 和 Gαz 蛋白来调节小鼠大脑皮质中的 MEK-ERK,但不调节 FADD 途径。