• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期宫颈残端癌的特征、并发症和结局:腹腔镜与开腹手术比较。

Characteristics, complications, and outcomes of early-stage cervical stump carcinoma: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, The 92276Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2021 Feb;49(2):300060521992247. doi: 10.1177/0300060521992247.

DOI:10.1177/0300060521992247
PMID:33641455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7917881/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the characteristics, surgical complications, and overall survival between patients undergoing laparoscopy versus laparotomy for treatment of early-stage cervical stump carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO, 2009) stage IA2 to IIA2 cervical stump carcinoma who underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January 2000 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients' clinical characteristics, pathological features, complications, and follow-up data were retrieved.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were included in the analysis; 58 underwent laparoscopy and 14 underwent laparotomy. With respect to surgical complications, laparoscopy was associated with a significantly lower complication rate, less blood loss, a shorter operative time, and a higher hospitalization fee than laparotomy. Survival was not significantly different between the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival was not significantly different between the two surgical approaches, the rate of surgical complications was much lower in the laparoscopy than laparotomy group.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗早期宫颈残端癌患者的特点、手术并发症和总体生存率。

方法

回顾性分析 2000 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月在复旦大学妇产科医院接受国际妇产科联合会(FIGO,2009)分期为 IA2 至 IIA2 期宫颈残端癌的腹腔镜或开腹手术治疗的患者。所有患者的临床特征、病理特征、并发症和随访数据均被检索。

结果

72 例患者纳入分析,其中 58 例行腹腔镜手术,14 例行开腹手术。在手术并发症方面,腹腔镜组的并发症发生率明显低于开腹组,出血量更少,手术时间更短,住院费用更高。腹腔镜组与开腹组的生存率无显著差异。

结论

尽管两种手术方法的生存率无显著差异,但腹腔镜组的手术并发症发生率明显低于开腹组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3330/7917881/564b68d4d97e/10.1177_0300060521992247-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3330/7917881/564b68d4d97e/10.1177_0300060521992247-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3330/7917881/564b68d4d97e/10.1177_0300060521992247-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics, complications, and outcomes of early-stage cervical stump carcinoma: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.早期宫颈残端癌的特征、并发症和结局:腹腔镜与开腹手术比较。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Feb;49(2):300060521992247. doi: 10.1177/0300060521992247.
2
Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.基于二维腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术作为基准的早期宫颈癌的三维腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的同步学习曲线:单外科医生的经验。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Aug 8;25:5903-5919. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914952.
3
[Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].[局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受腹腔镜手术或开腹手术预后的比较分析]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 25;55(9):609-616. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200727-00612.
4
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
5
[Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].[早期宫颈癌腹腔镜手术与开放手术的短期和长期结果比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 23;39(6):458-466. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.06.011.
6
[Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].腹腔镜与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗Ⅰa2 - Ⅱb期宫颈癌患者的安全性和有效性比较
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):915-22.
7
Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.微创外科手术与剖腹手术治疗早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的比较:生存结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Mar;156(3):591-597. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.038. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治性B型和C型子宫切除术的比较:长期结果
Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 23;88(3):289-296. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i3.6100.
9
Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术能否成为 IA2 期-IIA 期宫颈癌的标准手术方式?
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌患者术前锥切与复发风险的多中心研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jan;28(1):117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of integrated care model on urinary retention after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.综合护理模式对宫颈癌根治术后尿潴留的影响
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;41(4):963-967. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.4.9917.
2
Advanced cervical stump cancer after laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy: a case report of imaging, laparoscopic staging and treatment approach.腹腔镜次全子宫切除术后晚期宫颈残端癌:一例影像学、腹腔镜分期和治疗方法的报告。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 May 23;23(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02428-7.
3
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic trachelectomy following supracervical hysterectomy: a multicenter study.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
3
Retrospective analysis of surgery for cervical stump carcinoma at early stage.早期宫颈残端癌手术的回顾性分析。
次全子宫切除术后腹腔镜宫颈切除术的手术结果:一项多中心研究。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Nov;65(6):542-551. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22094. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;8(2):352-355. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1517. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
Carcinoma of the cervical stump: fifty years of experience.宫颈残端癌:五十年的经验。
Oncol Rep. 2011 Jun;25(6):1651-4. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1228. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
5
Total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy with intraoperative sentinel node identification for early cervical stump cancer.全腹腔镜根治性宫颈切除术联合术中前哨淋巴结识别术治疗早期宫颈残端癌
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):522-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.09.004.
6
Carcinoma of the cervical stump. The radiumhemmet series 1959-1987. Treatment and prognosis.宫颈残端癌。镭hemmet系列研究(1959 - 1987年)。治疗与预后。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Feb;80(2):152-7.
7
Carcinoma of the cervical stump: retrospective analysis of 77 cases.宫颈残端癌:77例回顾性分析。
Radiother Oncol. 1997 May;43(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(97)01918-x.
8
Carcinoma of the cervical stump: a review of 213 cases.宫颈残端癌:213例病例回顾
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(9):1231-6. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90063-l.
9
Cervical stump carcinoma.宫颈残端癌
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 May;20(5):933-8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90188-a.
10
Carcinoma of the cervical stump.宫颈残端癌
Gynecol Oncol. 1992 Aug;46(2):199-202. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90255-h.