Suppr超能文献

用于常规无创泪膜破裂时间评估的手动干涉测量装置。

Manual interferometric device for routine non-invasive tear film break-up time assessment.

作者信息

Pauk Sania Vidas, Petriček Igor, Tomić Martina, Bulum Tomislav, Jandroković Sonja, Kalauz Miro, Masnec Sanja, Jukić Tomislav

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.

School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 3;36(3):94-102. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1884272. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

Abstract

: To determine the feasibility of non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using the Handheld tear lipid layer thickness assessment instrument and compare it with the standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test and other dry eye tests.: 108 subjects were enrolled, 56 with and 52 without dry eye symptoms. Schein questionnaire was used to determine the severity of dry eye symptoms. Ocular signs were assessed by NIBUT, TBUT, lipid layer thickness (LLT), lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF), conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal staining.: Median NIBUT and TBUT, and other clinical test values significantly differed among the dry eye symptoms group and control group. NIBUT yielded the most significant difference between the groups (NIBUT: 7 sec vs. 17.5 sec, < .001, Z = 5.94; TBUT: 5 sec vs. 10 sec, < .001, Z = 4.38; LLT: = .007; LIPCOF: < .001, conjunctival hyperemia: < .047, corneal staining: < .010). Spearman's test showed a significant correlation between NIBUT and TBUT ( < .001), NIBUT and LLT ( = .001), NIBUT and LIPCOF ( = .019), NIBUT and conjunctival hyperemia ( = .002), and NIBUT and corneal staining ( = .012) in the dry eye symptoms group. NIBUT did not significantly differ among the three measurements in both groups of patients ( = .061, = .096), while TBUT values did in the control group ( < .001). Short NIBUT values were the main predictors and indicators of dry eye complaints (AOR = 0.87, < .001), superior to TBUT (AOR = 0.88, = .008) and other tests even after adjustment for age and gender.: NIBUT measured by Handheld instrument is a simple, accessible, practical, and, most of all, reproducible and objective method that might allow NIBUT assessment on a regular basis.

摘要

目的

使用手持泪液脂质层厚度评估仪器确定非侵入性泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)评估的可行性,并将其与标准泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)测试及其他干眼测试进行比较。

方法

招募108名受试者,其中56名有干眼症状,52名无干眼症状。使用Schein问卷确定干眼症状的严重程度。通过NIBUT、TBUT、脂质层厚度(LLT)、睑结膜平行线样皱褶(LIPCOF)、结膜充血和角膜染色评估眼部体征。

结果

干眼症状组和对照组之间,NIBUT和TBUT的中位数以及其他临床测试值存在显著差异。两组之间NIBUT的差异最为显著(NIBUT:7秒对17.5秒,P <.001,Z = 5.94;TBUT:5秒对10秒,P <.001,Z = 4.38;LLT:P =.007;LIPCOF:P <.001,结膜充血:P <.047,角膜染色:P <.010)。Spearman检验显示,在干眼症状组中,NIBUT与TBUT(P <.001)、NIBUT与LLT(P =.001)、NIBUT与LIPCOF(P =.019)、NIBUT与结膜充血(P =.002)以及NIBUT与角膜染色(P =.012)之间存在显著相关性。两组患者的三次测量中,NIBUT无显著差异(P =.061,P =.096),而对照组中TBUT值存在显著差异(P <.001)。较短的NIBUT值是干眼主诉的主要预测指标(优势比[AOR]=0.87,P <.001),即使在调整年龄和性别后,其优于TBUT(AOR = 0.88,P =.008)及其他测试。

结论

通过手持仪器测量的NIBUT是一种简单、可及、实用的方法,最重要的是,它具有可重复性和客观性,可能允许定期进行NIBUT评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验