• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用手持式脂质层检查仪器进行非侵入性泪膜破裂时间评估

NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT.

作者信息

Vidas Pauk Sania, Petriček Igor, Jukić Tomislav, Popović-Suić Smiljka, Tomić Martina, Kalauz Miro, Jandroković Sonja, Masnec Sanja

机构信息

1Department of Ophthalmology, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Vuk Vrhovac University Clinic for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Merkur University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Mar;58(1):63-71. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.09.

DOI:10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.09
PMID:31363327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6629192/
Abstract

The aim was to determine feasibility and reliability of noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument, and to compare it with standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test. Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 with and 19 without dry eye symptoms. Schein questionnaire was used to assess dry eye symptoms. During examination, three NIBUT measurements were performed on each eye using handheld instrument, followed by three TBUT measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity and logistic regression analysis were generated. Median NIBUT values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group than in control group in all three measurements (9, 8 and 8 s . 21, 22 and 21 s; p<0.001). TBUT values showed no significant difference between the groups in the first measurement (p=0.053), but the values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group in second and third measurements (p=0.020). The cutoff value to distinguish patients with symptoms of dry eye from control group was 12 seconds for NIBUT and 8 seconds for TBUT, with NIBUT having significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and positive predictive value. NIBUT, measured by handheld lipid layer examination instrument, was superior to TBUT in detecting dry eye.

摘要

目的是确定使用手持式脂质层检查仪器评估无创泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)的可行性和可靠性,并将其与标准泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)测试进行比较。招募了50名患者,其中31名有干眼症状,19名没有干眼症状。使用Schein问卷评估干眼症状。检查期间,使用手持式仪器对每只眼睛进行三次NIBUT测量,然后进行三次TBUT测量。生成了受试者工作特征曲线、敏感性、特异性和逻辑回归分析。在所有三次测量中,干眼症状组的NIBUT中位数均显著短于对照组(9、8和8秒对21、22和21秒;p<0.001)。TBUT值在第一次测量中两组之间无显著差异(p=0.053),但在第二次和第三次测量中,干眼症状组的值显著较短(p=0.020)。区分有干眼症状患者与对照组的临界值,NIBUT为12秒,TBUT为8秒,NIBUT的敏感性、特异性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积和阳性预测值显著更高。通过手持式脂质层检查仪器测量的NIBUT在检测干眼中优于TBUT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/6629192/f527dc97350b/acc-58-63-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/6629192/626091f0b1f9/acc-58-63-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/6629192/d0f22ccd07ff/acc-58-63-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/6629192/f527dc97350b/acc-58-63-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/6629192/626091f0b1f9/acc-58-63-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/6629192/d0f22ccd07ff/acc-58-63-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/492c/6629192/f527dc97350b/acc-58-63-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT.使用手持式脂质层检查仪器进行非侵入性泪膜破裂时间评估
Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Mar;58(1):63-71. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.01.09.
2
Manual interferometric device for routine non-invasive tear film break-up time assessment.用于常规无创泪膜破裂时间评估的手动干涉测量装置。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 3;36(3):94-102. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1884272. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tear film break-up time assessed by the simple manual interferometric device.简单手动干涉仪评估的非侵入性泪膜破裂时间的诊断准确性。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023 Apr;46(2):101776. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2022.101776. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Methods of Tear Film Stability Assessment: A Randomized Crossover Trial.比较评估泪膜稳定性评估的临床方法:一项随机交叉试验。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):291-294. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6489.
5
A comparative study to assess the clinical use of Fluorescein Meniscus Time (FMT) with Tear Break up Time (TBUT) and Schirmer's tests (ST) in the diagnosis of dry eyes.一项比较研究,旨在评估荧光素半月皱襞时间(FMT)与泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)及泪液分泌试验(ST)在干眼症诊断中的临床应用。
Eye (Lond). 2002 Sep;16(5):594-600. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700177.
6
Objective optical assessment of tear-film quality dynamics in normal and mildly symptomatic dry eyes.客观评估正常和轻度症状干眼的泪膜质量动态。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Aug;37(8):1481-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.036.
7
Performance of tear osmolarity compared to previous diagnostic tests for dry eye diseases.泪液渗透压与其他干眼病诊断测试的性能比较。
Curr Eye Res. 2010 Jul;35(7):553-64. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.484557.
8
Non-invasive assessment of tear film stability with a novel corneal topographer in Indian subjects.使用新型角膜地形图仪对印度受试者泪膜稳定性进行无创评估。
Int Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;36(6):781-790. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0186-7. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Screening utility of a rapid non-invasive dry eye assessment algorithm.一种快速无创干眼评估算法的筛查效用。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Oct;42(5):497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
[Lack of concordance between dry eye syndrome questionnaires and diagnostic tests].[干眼综合征问卷与诊断测试之间缺乏一致性]
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011 Jan;86(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2010.07.004. Epub 2011 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Translating Biomarker Discovery: From Bench to Bedside in Dry Eye Disease.干眼症生物标志物发现的转化:从实验室到临床应用
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Sep 3;26(17):8556. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178556.
2
Ocular Surface Disease and Dry Eye Severity in Glaucoma Patients at Urban Private Eye Care Centres in Malaysia.马来西亚城市私立眼科护理中心青光眼患者的眼表疾病与干眼严重程度
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 14;18:3249-3262. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S476779. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of TearCare on Reading Speed in Patients with Dry Eye Disease.泪液护理对干眼症患者阅读速度的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity of Diagnostic Tests for Dry Eye in Patients with Blepharospasm.眼睑痉挛患者干眼诊断试验的敏感性
Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Sep;56(3):375-381. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.03.03.
2
TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report.TFOS DEWS II 管理和治疗报告。
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):575-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report.TFOS DEWS II 泪膜报告。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 10;18:2873-2878. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S469300. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of Two Artificial Tears Containing Hyaluronic Acid for Post Cataract Surgery Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.两种含透明质酸人工泪液治疗白内障术后干眼症的评估:一项随机对照试验
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Oct;13(10):2615-2627. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01015-9. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
5
Post-Blink Blur Time-A Simple Test to Detect Dry Eye-Related Visual Disturbances.眨眼后模糊时间——一种检测干眼相关视觉障碍的简单测试。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 24;13(9):2473. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092473.
6
A novel method of evaluating the non-invasive tear film break-up time and progression of corneal opacification in dogs using imaging video.一种使用成像视频评估犬类非侵入性泪膜破裂时间和角膜混浊进展的新方法。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Apr 8;11:1298467. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1298467. eCollection 2024.
7
THE EFFECT OF PALPEBRAL FISSURE HEIGHT IN PRIMARY GAZE POSITION ON TEAR FILM STABILITY.上睑裂高度在原发性注视位置对泪膜稳定性的影响。
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Aug;62(2):283-290. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.02.05.
8
Contact lens fitting and changes in the tear film dynamics: mathematical and computational models review.接触镜适配与泪膜动力学变化:数学与计算模型综述。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;262(9):2751-2764. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06400-5. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
9
Face Mask and Tear Film Stability: A Pilot Study of the Objective Measurement of Tear Break-Up Time.面罩与泪膜稳定性:泪膜破裂时间客观测量的初步研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 16;12(24):7727. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247727.
10
Evaluating Viscosity and Tear Breakup Time of Contemporary Commercial Ocular Lubricants on an In Vitro Eye Model.评估体外眼模型中当代商业眼用润滑剂的黏度和泪膜破裂时间。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Jun 1;12(6):29. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.6.29.
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):366-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report.TFOS DEWS II 定义与分类报告。
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
5
Relationship between Corneal Sensation, Blinking, and Tear Film Quality.角膜感觉、眨眼与泪膜质量之间的关系。
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 May;93(5):471-81. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000827.
6
The Relationship Between Tear Ferning Patterns and Non-invasive Tear Break-up Time in Normal Asian Population.正常亚洲人群中泪液蕨类结晶模式与非侵入性泪膜破裂时间的关系
J Optom. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
7
Regional Differences in Tear Film Stability and Meibomian Glands in Patients With Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye.水液缺乏型干眼患者泪膜稳定性及睑板腺的区域差异
Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Jul;42(4):250-5. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000191.
8
Automatic noninvasive tear breakup time (TBUT) and conventional fluorescent TBUT.自动无创泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)和传统荧光TBUT。
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Dec;91(12):1412-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000418.
9
Correlations among ocular surface temperature difference value, the tear meniscus height, Schirmer's test and fluorescein tear film break up time.眼表温度差值、泪液弯月面高度、泪液分泌试验及荧光素泪膜破裂时间之间的相关性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;99(4):482-7. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305183. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
10
Tear film stability: a review.泪膜稳定性:综述。
Exp Eye Res. 2013 Dec;117:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 22.