Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Cedarville University School of Pharmacy, 251 N Main St, Cedarville, OH 45314, United States.
Student Researcher, Cedarville University School of Pharmacy, 251 N Main St #2800, Cedarville, OH 45314, United States.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Mar;13(3):273-278. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
As active learning is being encouraged in pharmacy education, valid active learning pedagogies should be investigated. Peer instruction pedagogy has yet to be explored in the pharmacy education setting. Peer instruction assesses student understanding of a topic through multiple choice questions called ConcepTests. When the class scores below a threshold, students are given time to discuss the ConcepTest. They are then given an opportunity to repeat the same ConcepTest.
Peer instruction pedagogy was implemented in the 2017 fall semester of PHAR 6112: Introduction to Self-Care. Changes in student responses were recorded via Turning Technologies software to identify if peer instruction increased the number of students who answered ConcepTests correctly. Changes in responses were analyzed via a paired t-test and McNemar test. Students were also surveyed on their perceptions of the pedagogy.
A total of 51 questions proceeded through the entirety of the peer instruction algorithm. Peer instruction was associated with an increase in correct response (P < .001). Students' total number of correct responses to ConcepTest questions increased by an average of 16.1 (31.5%) following peer instruction (P<.001). Over 86% of students would recommend that other instructors use ConcepTests.
Peer instruction resulted in an increase in correct responses to session ConcepTests. This pedagogy has potential as an active learning method to deliver pharmacy material.
随着主动学习在药学教育中的推广,应该研究有效的主动学习教学法。同伴教学法在药学教育环境中尚未得到探索。同伴教学通过多项选择题(称为 ConceptTests)来评估学生对某一主题的理解。当班级得分低于某个阈值时,学生将有时间讨论 ConceptTest。然后,他们将有机会重复相同的 ConceptTest。
在 2017 年秋季的 PHAR 6112:自我保健入门课程中实施了同伴教学法。通过 Turning Technologies 软件记录学生的反应变化,以确定同伴教学是否增加了回答 ConceptTest 正确的学生人数。通过配对 t 检验和 McNemar 检验分析反应变化。学生还对该教学法的看法进行了调查。
共有 51 个问题通过了整个同伴教学算法。同伴教学与正确答案的增加有关(P < 0.001)。在同伴教学后,学生对 ConceptTest 问题的正确答案总数平均增加了 16.1 个(31.5%)(P <.001)。超过 86%的学生愿意推荐其他教师使用 ConceptTests。
同伴教学导致对课程 ConceptTest 的正确答案增加。这种教学法有可能成为一种主动学习方法来教授药学知识。