• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队学习教学法提高了中国药学教育的质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Team-based learning pedagogy enhances the quality of Chinese pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 20, Section 3, Renmin Nanlu, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1724-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1724-6
PMID:31357986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6664710/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent years have witnessed the wide application of team-based learning(TBL) pedagogy in Chinese pharmacy education. However, the relevant systematic review evaluating the effects of such new pedagogical approach has not been established. The present study was designed to examine systematically the effect of using TBL approach in pharmacy education in China.

METHODS

Six databases were searched from the inception to January 2019. The studies reporting the performance of pharmacy students in Chinese university or college receiving TBL pedagogy compared to those receiving traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) were enrolled to be analyzed. Scores of the objective theoretical test were considered as the primary outcome, and the results from questionnaires about the number of students who approved the effects of TBL pedagogy on improving their learning enthusiasm, self-study ability, thinking ability, and communication skills were considered as the secondary outcome. A meta-analysis was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement.

RESULTS

A total of 1271 students in 12 studies published from 2013 to 2018 were enrolled in present analysis. Compared with traditional LBL pedagogy, TBL pedagogy exhibited more effectiveness in developing the objective tests scores of pharmacy students from both universities (SMD = 1.69, 95% CI [1.10, 2.28], p < 0.00001) and colleges (SMD = 4.37, 95% CI [1.33, 7.40], p < 0.00001), and such pedagogy applied well in experiments-oriented courses (SMD = 2.14, 95% CI [0.86, 3.43], p < 0.00001) and theory-oriented courses (SMD = 2.77, 95% CI [1.41, 4.14], p < 0.00001). In addition, it developed students' learning enthusiasm, students' self-study ability, thinking ability, and enhanced students' communication skills.

CONCLUSIONS

TBL pedagogy has developed rapidly and applied widely in Chinese pharmacy education during the last decade. The results indicated that such novel pedagogy is compatible with the present situation of Chinese pharmacy education. And it could be considered as an effective method to enhance both the theoretical test scores and various abilities of Chinese pharmacy students.

摘要

背景

近年来,团队学习(TBL)教学法在中国药学教育中得到了广泛应用。然而,尚未建立相关的系统评价来评估这种新教学方法的效果。本研究旨在系统评估 TBL 教学法在我国药学教育中的应用效果。

方法

从建库到 2019 年 1 月,检索了 6 个数据库。纳入报告中国大学生或大学生接受 TBL 教学法与接受传统讲授式学习(LBL)相比,在药学学生表现的研究。客观理论考试成绩作为主要结局指标,对问卷调查结果进行分析,评估学生对 TBL 教学法在提高学习热情、自学能力、思维能力和沟通技巧方面效果的认可程度。按照 Cochrane 评论员手册和系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目进行荟萃分析。

结果

共有 12 项 2013 年至 2018 年发表的研究纳入了 1271 名学生。与传统的 LBL 教学法相比,TBL 教学法在提高大学生(SMD=1.69,95%CI[1.10,2.28],p<0.00001)和大学生(SMD=4.37,95%CI[1.33,7.40],p<0.00001)客观测试成绩方面更有效,且在实验性课程(SMD=2.14,95%CI[0.86,3.43],p<0.00001)和理论性课程(SMD=2.77,95%CI[1.41,4.14],p<0.00001)中应用良好。此外,它还培养了学生的学习热情、自学能力、思维能力和沟通能力。

结论

TBL 教学法在过去十年中在中国药学教育中迅速发展并得到广泛应用。结果表明,这种新教学法与中国药学教育的现状相适应。它可以被视为提高中国药学学生理论考试成绩和各种能力的有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7c/6664710/1b23b5764f92/12909_2019_1724_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7c/6664710/1b23b5764f92/12909_2019_1724_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da7c/6664710/1b23b5764f92/12909_2019_1724_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Team-based learning pedagogy enhances the quality of Chinese pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.团队学习教学法提高了中国药学教育的质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1724-6.
2
Flipped classroom improves student learning outcome in Chinese pharmacy education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.翻转课堂提高了中药药学教育中的学生学习成果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 30;13:936899. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.936899. eCollection 2022.
3
Team-based learning vs. lecture-based learning in nursing: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.基于团队的学习与基于讲授的学习在护理中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:1044014. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1044014. eCollection 2022.
4
Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China.基于团队学习的医学教育在中国的效果的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1179-1.
5
Effectiveness of problem-based learning in Chinese pharmacy education: a meta-analysis.基于问题的学习在中国药学教育中的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 19;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0546-z.
6
Modified task-based learning program promotes problem-solving capacity among Chinese medical postgraduates: a mixed quantitative survey.改良后的基于任务的学习项目提高了中国医学研究生的问题解决能力:一项混合定量调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0994-0.
7
Team-based learning versus traditional teaching effect on pharmacy Students' Performance: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.基于团队的学习与传统教学对药学专业学生成绩的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Apr;32(4):102017. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102017. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Professional and pre-professional pharmacy students' perceptions of team based learning (TBL) at a private research-intensive university.私立研究型大学中专业及准专业药学专业学生对基于团队的学习(TBL)的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):666-670. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较基于问题的混合式学习与讲授式学习(PBL + LBL)和讲授式教学法对中国医学生临床课程学习的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19687. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019687.
10
Effectiveness of case-based learning in Chinese dental education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于案例的学习在口腔医学教育中的应用效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e048497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048497.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Inverted Classroom Approach in a Case-Study Course on Antithrombotic Drug Use in a PharmD Curriculum: French Monocentric Randomized Study.药学博士课程中抗血栓药物使用案例研究课程的翻转课堂教学法评估:法国单中心随机研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Apr 10;11:e67419. doi: 10.2196/67419.
2
Evaluation of problem-based learning for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis in undergraduate students.基于对本科生的综合分析评价以问题为基础的药理学学习。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 11;103(41):e39376. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039376.
3
Team-based learning in health professions education: an umbrella review.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China.基于团队学习的医学教育在中国的效果的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1179-1.
2
Effectiveness of various innovative learning methods in health science classrooms: a meta-analysis.健康科学课堂中各种创新学习方法的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1151-1167. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9753-6. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
3
A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Team-based Learning and Lecture Format on Learning Outcomes.
团队学习在健康职业教育中的应用:综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1131. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06147-x.
4
Enhancing knowledge mastery in resident students through peer-teaching: a study in respiratory medicine.通过同伴教学提高住院医师的知识掌握程度:一项呼吸医学研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05130-w.
5
Team-based learning versus traditional teaching effect on pharmacy Students' Performance: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.基于团队的学习与传统教学对药学专业学生成绩的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Apr;32(4):102017. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102017. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Implementation of Team-Based Learning for a Clinical Module of the Ethiopian Undergraduate Anesthesia Curriculum and Students' Perspectives: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚本科麻醉课程临床模块的基于团队学习的实施及学生观点:一项试点横断面研究
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Dec 15;14:1413-1424. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S437710. eCollection 2023.
7
A Scoping Review of Educator Proficiency Interventions in Pharmacy Education Illustrated by an Interdisciplinary Model Integrating Pedagogical Theories into Practice.以将教学理论融入实践的跨学科模型为例的药学教育中教育者能力干预的范围综述。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Oct 30;11(6):172. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11060172.
8
Comparison of the Effect of Education Using Team-based Learning Method and Lecture Method on Controlling Diabetes in the Elderly: A Quasi-Experimental Study.团队学习法与讲授法在老年糖尿病控制教育效果比较:一项准实验研究。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023 Jul;11(3):201-209. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.97837.2210.
9
Efficacy of modified team-based learning in a flipped classroom for an acute-care nursing course: A mixed-methods study.改良团队学习在翻转课堂中对急症护理课程的效果:一项混合方法研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4786-4796. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1730. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Application of team-based learning to ophthalmology in China.团队学习在我国眼科学中的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:922325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922325. eCollection 2022.
基于团队学习和讲座形式对学习成果影响的随机交叉比较
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807120.
4
Effectiveness of problem-based learning in Chinese pharmacy education: a meta-analysis.基于问题的学习在中国药学教育中的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 19;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0546-z.
5
Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review.将既定准则应用于医学院的团队学习计划:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2014 Apr;89(4):678-88. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162.
6
Development of emotional intelligence in a team-based learning internal medicine clerkship.团队学习内科实习中情绪智力的发展。
Med Teach. 2012;34(10):802-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687121. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
7
Perceptions and Attitudes of First-Year Medical Students on a Modified Team-Based Learning (TBL) Strategy in Anatomy.一年级医学生对解剖学中改良的基于团队学习(TBL)策略的认知与态度
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug;12(3):336-43. doi: 10.12816/0003148. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
8
Team-based learning, a learning strategy for clinical reasoning, in students with problem-based learning tutorial experiences.基于团队的学习,一种针对临床推理的学习策略,适用于有基于问题的学习教程经验的学生。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012 May;227(1):23-9. doi: 10.1620/tjem.227.23.
9
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
10
Reformation of medical education in China.中国医学教育改革
Lancet. 2010 May 1;375(9725):1502-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60241-3. Epub 2010 Mar 25.