De Santis Stefano, Simone Maria Domenica, Mercadante Sebastiano, Mediati Rocco Domenico, Vellucci Renato, Marchetti Paolo, Tonini Giuseppe, Cuomo Arturo, Caraceni Augusto, Natoli Silvia, Armento Grazia, Blasi Livio, Mammucari Massimo
Palliative Care and Oncologic Pain Service, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Hematology and BMT Unit, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 19;13:1747-1756. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S290551. eCollection 2021.
International guidelines recommend moderate-to-severe cancer pain to be treated with strong opioids. However, pain management remains an unsolved matter, at least in the demanding oncology and palliative care setting. Although cancer pain consists of multiple components, which interact in complex ways where combination therapy can better intercept multiple pain characteristics, few studies have used a non-opioid/opioid association to exploit possible synergistic actions. Even the efforts of a recent approach emphasizing appropriate pain assessment and accurate classification to obtain personalized pain management have not produced a satisfactory analgesic strategy.
This analysis was intended to evaluate the effectiveness of the immediate release fixed combination of oxycodone/acetaminophen (OxyIR/Par) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe intensity background pain used alone or in combination with other strong opioids in cancer patients with breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). This is a secondary analysis of a wider observational, prospective, multicenter study [Italian Oncologic Pain multiSetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS)] performed on 179 patients treated with opioids for cancer pain who received the fixed combination of oxycodone/acetaminophen (OxyIR/Par) for the treatment of background pain (BGP).
Cancer patients with breakthrough cancer pain and controlled BGP (Background Pain) were classified according to the presence of analgesic therapy with tablets of fixed combination OxyIR/Par alone (group A, n=120) or tablets of fixed combination OxyIR/Par combined with other strong opioids (group B, n=59). Clinical features of group A were different to group B: higher mean Karnofsky Performance Status Index 70.3% (95% CI=67.2-73.5; median=70, CI=60-80) vs 58.3 (95% CI=53.4-63.2; median=50, CI=45-70) (<0.001), and mainly group A patients were treated in an ambulatory setting (55.0% group A vs 33.9% group B) (p<0.001). Both groups had managed BGP with similar mean dosages (group A: 12.0, CI=10.5-13.4; group B: 13.1, CI=11.0-15.1) and frequencies of OxyIR/Par alone for group A and in association to other opioids for group B, but Breakthrough cancer Pain (BTcP) exhibited different characteristics in the two groups, showing a lower mean intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) of 7.5 (95% CI=7.2-7.7; median=7, CI=7-8 group A) vs 7.9 (95% CI=7.6, 8.2; median= 8, CI=7-9 group B) (=0.04) and a higher percentage of patients had a faster onset, defined as the maximum intensity reached in less than 10 minutes, 81.7% (N=98) in group A vs 59.3% (n=35) in group B (=0.002).
This is the first analysis about the efficacy of an immediate-release fixed combination of OxyIR/Par in the real world for moderate-to-severe background cancer pain and breakthrough cancer pain. The oral fixed combination OxyIR/Par provided an adequate level of analgesia for moderate-severe background cancer pain, in a different cohort of cancer patients with different performance status, both in ambulatory and palliative settings. The low dosage of fixed combination OxyIR/Par was effective alone or in association with other opioids.
国际指南建议使用强阿片类药物治疗中重度癌痛。然而,疼痛管理仍是一个未解决的问题,至少在要求较高的肿瘤学和姑息治疗环境中如此。尽管癌痛由多个成分组成,这些成分以复杂的方式相互作用,联合治疗可以更好地拦截多种疼痛特征,但很少有研究使用非阿片类药物/阿片类药物联合来利用可能的协同作用。即使最近强调适当疼痛评估和准确分类以实现个性化疼痛管理的方法也未能产生令人满意的镇痛策略。
本分析旨在评估羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚速释固定复方制剂(OxyIR/Par)单独使用或与其他强阿片类药物联合用于治疗伴有爆发性癌痛(BTcP)的癌症患者中重度背景疼痛的有效性。这是一项对更广泛的观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究[意大利肿瘤疼痛多环境多中心调查(IOPS-MS)]的二次分析,该研究对179例接受阿片类药物治疗癌痛并接受羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚固定复方制剂(OxyIR/Par)治疗背景疼痛(BGP)的患者进行。
伴有爆发性癌痛且背景疼痛得到控制的癌症患者,根据单独使用羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚固定复方片剂(A组,n = 120)或羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚固定复方片剂与其他强阿片类药物联合使用(B组,n = 59)进行分类。A组的临床特征与B组不同:平均卡诺夫斯基表现状态指数更高,分别为70.3%(95%CI = 67.2 - 73.5;中位数 = 70,CI = 60 - 80)和58.3(95%CI = 53.4 - 63.2;中位数 = 50,CI = 45 - 70)(<0.001),并且主要是A组患者在门诊环境中接受治疗(A组为55.0%,B组为33.9%)(p < 0.001)。两组使用相似的平均剂量管理背景疼痛(A组:12.0,CI = 10.5 - 13.4;B组:13.1,CI = 11.0 - 15.1),A组单独使用OxyIR/Par,B组与其他阿片类药物联合使用,但两组的爆发性癌痛(BTcP)表现出不同特征,平均强度数字评分量表(NRS)较低,分别为7.5(95%CI = 7.2 - 7.7;中位数 = 7,CI = 7 - 8 A组)和7.9(95%CI =