• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Oxycodone/Acetaminophen: The Tailoring Combination Treatment for Specific Clinical Profile of Opioid Well-Responsive Cancer Pain.羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚:针对阿片类药物反应良好的癌症疼痛特定临床特征的定制联合治疗。
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 19;13:1747-1756. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S290551. eCollection 2021.
2
3
High dosage of a fixed combination oxycodone/naloxone prolonged release: efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic cancer pain.高剂量固定剂量复方羟考酮/纳洛酮缓释片治疗慢性癌痛的疗效和耐受性。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3051-3058. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3709-5. Epub 2017 May 3.
4
[Effect of enterostomy on analgesic pattern in patients with advanced digestive tract cancer].[肠造口术对晚期消化道癌患者镇痛模式的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1159-1164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.011.
5
A double-blind, single-dose comparison of the analgesic efficacy of tramadol/acetaminophen combination tablets, hydrocodone/acetaminophen combination tablets, and placebo after oral surgery.曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚复方片剂、氢可酮/对乙酰氨基酚复方片剂与安慰剂在口腔手术后镇痛效果的双盲单剂量比较。
Clin Ther. 2002 Jun;24(6):953-68. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)80010-8.
6
Effectiveness of Oxycodone Hydrochloride (Strong Opioid) vs Combination Acetaminophen and Codeine (Mild Opioid) for Subacute Pain After Fractures Managed Surgically: A Randomized Clinical Trial.盐酸羟考酮(强阿片类药物)与对乙酰氨基酚和可待因复方制剂(弱阿片类药物)治疗手术治疗后亚急性骨折疼痛的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134988. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34988.
7
Effects of prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone on pain control, bowel function and quality of life: A prospective observational study.缓释羟考酮/纳洛酮对疼痛控制、肠道功能及生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Scand J Pain. 2014 Apr 1;5(2):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.01.004.
8
Controlled-release oxycodone tablets after transdermal-based opioid therapy in patients with cancer and non-cancer pain.经皮阿片类药物治疗的癌症和非癌痛患者应用控释羟考酮片。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011 Oct-Dec;23(5-6):328-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03325231.
9
The Utility of Oral Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Compared With Standard Opioids Following Arthroscopic Meniscectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.关节镜半月板切除术术后口服非甾体抗炎药与标准阿片类药物比较的效用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):864-870.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.018. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
10
Analgesic efficacy of morphine sulfate immediate release vs. oxycodone/acetaminophen for acute pain in the emergency department.硫酸吗啡即释制剂与羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚治疗急诊科急性疼痛的镇痛效果比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.034. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological Treatments and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Chronic Pain.慢性疼痛患者的药物治疗与治疗药物监测
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):2088. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15082088.
2
Personalized Medicine in Cancer Pain Management.癌症疼痛管理中的个性化医疗
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 28;13(8):1201. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081201.
3
Oxycodone-acetaminophen versus celecoxib for postoperative pain in knee osteoarthritis patients after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study.羟考酮-对乙酰氨基酚与塞来昔布用于全膝关节置换术后膝骨关节炎患者的术后疼痛:一项随机对照研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Nov;143(11):6753-6762. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04943-6. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of acetaminophen with and without oxycodone for analgesia in non-operative treatment of extremity fractures in adults: protocol for a double-blind randomized clinical trial.氨酚羟考酮与单纯氨酚待因用于成人四肢骨折非手术治疗的镇痛效果比较:一项双盲随机临床试验方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 17;20(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3579-x.
2
Reviewing without a Clinical Background Is Detrimental for Cancer Pain Management.没有临床背景的审查对癌症疼痛管理有害。
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 18;11(7):1005. doi: 10.3390/cancers11071005.
3
The Patient with Difficult Cancer Pain.患有难治性癌痛的患者。
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 19;11(4):565. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040565.
4
Cancer Pain Assessment and Classification.癌症疼痛评估与分类
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 10;11(4):510. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040510.
5
Factors influencing the use of opioids for breakthrough cancer pain: A secondary analysis of the IOPS-MS study.影响阿片类药物治疗爆发性癌痛的因素:IOPS-MS 研究的二次分析。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Apr;23(4):719-726. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1339. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
6
Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.成年患者癌痛的管理:ESMO临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv166-iv191. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy152.
7
Factors Influencing the Clinical Presentation of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients.影响癌症患者爆发性疼痛临床表现的因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Jun 1;10(6):175. doi: 10.3390/cancers10060175.
8
Adequacy of cancer-related pain management and predictors of undertreatment at referral to a pain clinic.癌症相关疼痛管理的充分性及转诊至疼痛诊所时治疗不足的预测因素。
J Pain Res. 2017 Aug 31;10:2097-2107. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S139715. eCollection 2017.
9
Analgesic effectiveness and tolerability of oral oxycodone/naloxone and pregabalin in patients with lung cancer and neuropathic pain: an observational analysis.口服羟考酮/纳洛酮与普瑞巴林对肺癌伴神经性疼痛患者的镇痛效果及耐受性:一项观察性分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Jul 4;9:4043-52. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S108144. eCollection 2016.
10
From "Breakthrough" to "Episodic" Cancer Pain? A European Association for Palliative Care Research Network Expert Delphi Survey Toward a Common Terminology and Classification of Transient Cancer Pain Exacerbations.从“突破性”到“发作性”癌痛?欧洲姑息治疗研究网络专家德尔菲调查,旨在形成短暂性癌痛加重的通用术语和分类
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):1013-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.329. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚:针对阿片类药物反应良好的癌症疼痛特定临床特征的定制联合治疗。

Oxycodone/Acetaminophen: The Tailoring Combination Treatment for Specific Clinical Profile of Opioid Well-Responsive Cancer Pain.

作者信息

De Santis Stefano, Simone Maria Domenica, Mercadante Sebastiano, Mediati Rocco Domenico, Vellucci Renato, Marchetti Paolo, Tonini Giuseppe, Cuomo Arturo, Caraceni Augusto, Natoli Silvia, Armento Grazia, Blasi Livio, Mammucari Massimo

机构信息

Palliative Care and Oncologic Pain Service, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Hematology and BMT Unit, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 19;13:1747-1756. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S290551. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/CMAR.S290551
PMID:33642876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7903954/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend moderate-to-severe cancer pain to be treated with strong opioids. However, pain management remains an unsolved matter, at least in the demanding oncology and palliative care setting. Although cancer pain consists of multiple components, which interact in complex ways where combination therapy can better intercept multiple pain characteristics, few studies have used a non-opioid/opioid association to exploit possible synergistic actions. Even the efforts of a recent approach emphasizing appropriate pain assessment and accurate classification to obtain personalized pain management have not produced a satisfactory analgesic strategy.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis was intended to evaluate the effectiveness of the immediate release fixed combination of oxycodone/acetaminophen (OxyIR/Par) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe intensity background pain used alone or in combination with other strong opioids in cancer patients with breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). This is a secondary analysis of a wider observational, prospective, multicenter study [Italian Oncologic Pain multiSetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS)] performed on 179 patients treated with opioids for cancer pain who received the fixed combination of oxycodone/acetaminophen (OxyIR/Par) for the treatment of background pain (BGP).

RESULTS

Cancer patients with breakthrough cancer pain and controlled BGP (Background Pain) were classified according to the presence of analgesic therapy with tablets of fixed combination OxyIR/Par alone (group A, n=120) or tablets of fixed combination OxyIR/Par combined with other strong opioids (group B, n=59). Clinical features of group A were different to group B: higher mean Karnofsky Performance Status Index 70.3% (95% CI=67.2-73.5; median=70, CI=60-80) vs 58.3 (95% CI=53.4-63.2; median=50, CI=45-70) (<0.001), and mainly group A patients were treated in an ambulatory setting (55.0% group A vs 33.9% group B) (p<0.001). Both groups had managed BGP with similar mean dosages (group A: 12.0, CI=10.5-13.4; group B: 13.1, CI=11.0-15.1) and frequencies of OxyIR/Par alone for group A and in association to other opioids for group B, but Breakthrough cancer Pain (BTcP) exhibited different characteristics in the two groups, showing a lower mean intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) of 7.5 (95% CI=7.2-7.7; median=7, CI=7-8 group A) vs 7.9 (95% CI=7.6, 8.2; median= 8, CI=7-9 group B) (=0.04) and a higher percentage of patients had a faster onset, defined as the maximum intensity reached in less than 10 minutes, 81.7% (N=98) in group A vs 59.3% (n=35) in group B (=0.002).

CONCLUSION

This is the first analysis about the efficacy of an immediate-release fixed combination of OxyIR/Par in the real world for moderate-to-severe background cancer pain and breakthrough cancer pain. The oral fixed combination OxyIR/Par provided an adequate level of analgesia for moderate-severe background cancer pain, in a different cohort of cancer patients with different performance status, both in ambulatory and palliative settings. The low dosage of fixed combination OxyIR/Par was effective alone or in association with other opioids.

摘要

背景

国际指南建议使用强阿片类药物治疗中重度癌痛。然而,疼痛管理仍是一个未解决的问题,至少在要求较高的肿瘤学和姑息治疗环境中如此。尽管癌痛由多个成分组成,这些成分以复杂的方式相互作用,联合治疗可以更好地拦截多种疼痛特征,但很少有研究使用非阿片类药物/阿片类药物联合来利用可能的协同作用。即使最近强调适当疼痛评估和准确分类以实现个性化疼痛管理的方法也未能产生令人满意的镇痛策略。

目的

本分析旨在评估羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚速释固定复方制剂(OxyIR/Par)单独使用或与其他强阿片类药物联合用于治疗伴有爆发性癌痛(BTcP)的癌症患者中重度背景疼痛的有效性。这是一项对更广泛的观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究[意大利肿瘤疼痛多环境多中心调查(IOPS-MS)]的二次分析,该研究对179例接受阿片类药物治疗癌痛并接受羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚固定复方制剂(OxyIR/Par)治疗背景疼痛(BGP)的患者进行。

结果

伴有爆发性癌痛且背景疼痛得到控制的癌症患者,根据单独使用羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚固定复方片剂(A组,n = 120)或羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚固定复方片剂与其他强阿片类药物联合使用(B组,n = 59)进行分类。A组的临床特征与B组不同:平均卡诺夫斯基表现状态指数更高,分别为70.3%(95%CI = 67.2 - 73.5;中位数 = 70,CI = 60 - 80)和58.3(95%CI = 53.4 - 63.2;中位数 = 50,CI = 45 - 70)(<0.001),并且主要是A组患者在门诊环境中接受治疗(A组为55.0%,B组为33.9%)(p < 0.001)。两组使用相似的平均剂量管理背景疼痛(A组:12.0,CI = 10.5 - 13.4;B组:13.1,CI = 11.0 - 15.1),A组单独使用OxyIR/Par,B组与其他阿片类药物联合使用,但两组的爆发性癌痛(BTcP)表现出不同特征,平均强度数字评分量表(NRS)较低,分别为7.5(95%CI = 7.2 - 7.7;中位数 = 7,CI = 7 - 8 A组)和7.9(95%CI =