• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reviewing without a Clinical Background Is Detrimental for Cancer Pain Management.没有临床背景的审查对癌症疼痛管理有害。
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 18;11(7):1005. doi: 10.3390/cancers11071005.
2
3
Responsible, Safe, and Effective Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物的合理、安全与有效处方:美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)指南
Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2S):S3-S92.
4
A survey of perceptions, attitudes, knowledge and practices of medical oncologists about cancer pain management in Spain.一项关于西班牙肿瘤内科医生对癌症疼痛管理的认知、态度、知识和实践的调查。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Aug;20(8):1061-1071. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1826-8. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
6
Spinal analgesia for advanced cancer patients: an update.晚期癌症患者的脊髓镇痛:更新。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 May;82(2):227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
7
Oral morphine for cancer pain.用于癌症疼痛的口服吗啡
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 22(7):CD003868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003868.pub3.
8
Ketamine as an adjuvant to opioids for cancer pain.氯胺酮作为阿片类药物治疗癌症疼痛的辅助药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD003351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003351.pub2.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update of American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians' (ASIPP) Guidelines.阿片类药物用于慢性非癌性疼痛的管理:美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)指南更新
Pain Physician. 2008 Mar;11(2 Suppl):S5-S62.

引用本文的文献

1
Oxycodone/Acetaminophen: The Tailoring Combination Treatment for Specific Clinical Profile of Opioid Well-Responsive Cancer Pain.羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚:针对阿片类药物反应良好的癌症疼痛特定临床特征的定制联合治疗。
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 19;13:1747-1756. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S290551. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Patient with Difficult Cancer Pain.患有难治性癌痛的患者。
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 19;11(4):565. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040565.
2
Cancer Pain Assessment and Classification.癌症疼痛评估与分类
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Apr 10;11(4):510. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040510.
3
Comparative Efficacy of Therapeutics for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.癌症慢性疼痛治疗药物的疗效比较:一项贝叶斯网状Meta 分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 10;37(20):1742-1752. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01567. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
Interventional Techniques to Management of Cancer-Related Pain: Clinical and Critical Aspects.癌症相关疼痛管理的介入技术:临床与关键要点
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 29;11(4):443. doi: 10.3390/cancers11040443.
5
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.科学家们奋起反对统计显著性。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
6
Cancer-Related Neuropathic Pain.癌症相关性神经病理性疼痛
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 16;11(3):373. doi: 10.3390/cancers11030373.
7
Prospects for the Use of Cannabinoids in Oncology and Palliative Care Practice: A Review of the Evidence.大麻素在肿瘤学和姑息治疗实践中的应用前景:证据综述
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 22;11(2):129. doi: 10.3390/cancers11020129.
8
Lidocaine for Cancer Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.利多卡因治疗成人癌痛的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):326-334. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0257. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
The benefits of practical clinical trials over traditional randomized clinical trials for opioid management.实践临床试验在阿片类药物管理方面相对于传统随机临床试验的优势。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;11(8):741-742. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1500898. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
Opioids for cancer pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews.用于癌症疼痛的阿片类药物——Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD012592. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012592.pub2.

没有临床背景的审查对癌症疼痛管理有害。

Reviewing without a Clinical Background Is Detrimental for Cancer Pain Management.

作者信息

Mercadante Sebastiano

机构信息

Supportive/Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jul 18;11(7):1005. doi: 10.3390/cancers11071005.

DOI:10.3390/cancers11071005
PMID:31323778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6678506/
Abstract

Reviews are a fundamental space for summarizing and spreading knowledge on a particular topic. Methodologic skills may improve the clarity and the meaning of data presentation. A recent editorial choice provided an advanced update on a topic such as cancer pain, providing meaningful and appropriate information on hot topics of cancer pain management. Recent reviews have reported strange and misleading data, suggesting to some adjuvant drugs or opioids for mild-moderate pain instead of opioids on the basis of an incomprehensible analysis performed without any clinical sense. This is a serious problem because such information, published in an authoritative journal, could dis-educate oncologists in their daily practice.

摘要

综述是总结和传播特定主题知识的重要领域。方法学技能可能会提高数据呈现的清晰度和意义。最近的一篇社论选择提供了关于癌症疼痛等主题的最新进展,提供了有关癌症疼痛管理热点话题的有意义且恰当的信息。最近的综述报告了奇怪且具有误导性的数据,基于毫无临床意义的难以理解的分析,建议使用某些辅助药物或阿片类药物治疗轻中度疼痛而非阿片类药物。这是一个严重的问题,因为在权威期刊上发表的此类信息可能会在日常实践中误导肿瘤学家。