Ries Stephanie K, Schendel Krista L, Herron Timothy J, Dronkers Nina F, Baldo Juliana V, Turken And U
School of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Center for Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, CA, United States.
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 10;12:607273. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.607273. eCollection 2021.
Proactive interference in working memory refers to the fact that memory of past experiences can interfere with the ability to hold new information in working memory. The left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) has been proposed to play an important role in resolving proactive interference in working memory. However, the role of white matter pathways and other cortical regions has been less investigated. Here we investigated proactive interference in working memory using the Recent Probes Test (RPT) in 15 stroke patients with unilateral chronic lesions in left ( = 7) or right ( = 2) prefrontal cortex (PFC), or left temporal cortex ( = 6). We examined the impact of lesions in both gray and white matter regions on the size of the proactive interference effect. We found that patients with left PFC lesions performed worse overall, but the proactive interference effect in this patient group was comparable to that of patients with right PFC lesions, temporal lobe lesions, and controls. Interestingly, the size of the interference effect was significantly correlated with the degree of damage in the extreme/external capsule and marginally correlated with the degree of damage in the inferior frontal occipital fasciculus (IFOF). These findings suggests that ventral white matter pathways connecting the LIFG to left posterior regions play a role in resolving proactive interference in working memory. This effect was particularly evident in one patient with a very large interference effect (>3 SDs above controls) who had mostly spared LIFG, but virtually absent ventral white matter pathways (i.e., passing through the extreme/external capsules and IFOF). This case study further supports the idea that the role of the LIFG in resolving interference in working memory is dependent on connectivity with posterior regions via ventral white matter pathways.
工作记忆中的前摄干扰是指过去经历的记忆会干扰在工作记忆中保存新信息的能力。左额下回(LIFG)被认为在解决工作记忆中的前摄干扰方面发挥重要作用。然而,白质通路和其他皮质区域的作用研究较少。在此,我们使用近期探针测试(RPT)对15例中风患者进行了工作记忆中的前摄干扰研究,这些患者单侧慢性病变位于左侧(n = 7)或右侧(n = 2)前额叶皮质(PFC),或左侧颞叶皮质(n = 6)。我们研究了灰质和白质区域的病变对前摄干扰效应大小的影响。我们发现,左侧PFC病变的患者总体表现较差,但该患者组的前摄干扰效应与右侧PFC病变、颞叶病变患者及对照组相当。有趣的是,干扰效应的大小与极端/外囊的损伤程度显著相关,与额枕下束(IFOF)的损伤程度呈边缘相关。这些发现表明,连接LIFG与左侧后部区域的腹侧白质通路在解决工作记忆中的前摄干扰方面发挥作用。这一效应在一名干扰效应非常大(比对照组高>3个标准差)的患者中尤为明显,该患者的LIFG基本未受影响,但腹侧白质通路几乎不存在(即穿过极端/外囊和IFOF)。该病例研究进一步支持了这样一种观点,即LIFG在解决工作记忆干扰方面的作用取决于通过腹侧白质通路与后部区域的连接。