Ries S K, Greenhouse I, Dronkers N F, Haaland K Y, Knight R T
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Oct;63:215-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
Recent actions can benefit or disrupt our current actions and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to play a major role in the regulation of these actions before they occur. The left PFC has been associated with overcoming interference from past events in the context of language production and working memory. The right PFC, and especially the right IFG, has been associated with preparatory inhibition processes. But damage to the right PFC has also been associated with impairment in sustaining actions in motor intentional disorders. Moreover, bilateral dorsolateral PFC has been associated with the ability to maintain task-sets, and improve the performance of current actions based on previous experience. However, potential hemispheric asymmetries in anticipatory regulation of action have not yet been delineated. In the present study, patients with left (n=7) vs. right (n=6) PFC damage due to stroke and 14 aged- and education-matched controls performed a picture naming and a verbal Simon task (participants had to say "right" or "left" depending on the color of the picture while ignoring its position). In both tasks, performance depended on the nature of the preceding trial, but in different ways. In the naming task, performance decreased if previous pictures were from the same rather than from different semantic categories (i.e., semantic interference effect). In the Simon task, performance was better for both compatible (i.e., response matching the position of the stimulus) and incompatible trials when preceded by a trial of the same compatibility (i.e. Gratton effect) relative to sequential trials of different compatibility. Left PFC patients were selectively impaired in picture naming; they had an increased semantic interference effect compared to both right PFC patients and aged-matched controls. Conversely, right PFC patients were selectively impaired in the Simon task compared to controls or left PFC patients; they showed no benefit when sequential trials were compatible (cC vs. iC trials) or a decreased Gratton effect. These results provide evidence for a double dissociation between left and right PFC in the anticipatory regulation of action. Our results are in agreement with a preponderant role of the left PFC in overcoming proactive interference from competing memory representations and provide evidence that the right PFC, plays a role in sustaining goal-directed actions consistent with clinical data in right PFC patients with motor intentional disorders.
近期的行为可能会对我们当前的行为产生促进或干扰作用,而前额叶皮质(PFC)被认为在这些行为发生之前的调节过程中起着主要作用。左前额叶皮质与在语言产生和工作记忆背景下克服过去事件的干扰有关。右前额叶皮质,尤其是右侧额下回(IFG),与准备性抑制过程有关。但右前额叶皮质受损也与运动意向障碍中维持行为的能力受损有关。此外,双侧背外侧前额叶皮质与维持任务集的能力以及根据先前经验提高当前行为的表现有关。然而,在行动的预期调节中潜在的半球不对称性尚未得到明确。在本研究中,因中风导致左前额叶皮质受损的患者(n = 7)与右前额叶皮质受损的患者(n = 6)以及14名年龄和教育程度匹配的对照组进行了图片命名和言语西蒙任务(参与者必须根据图片的颜色说“右”或“左”,同时忽略其位置)。在这两个任务中,表现取决于前一次试验的性质,但方式不同。在命名任务中,如果先前的图片来自相同而非不同的语义类别(即语义干扰效应),表现会下降。在西蒙任务中,当先前试验具有相同的相容性(即格拉顿效应)时,与不同相容性的连续试验相比,相容试验(即反应与刺激位置匹配)和不相容试验的表现都更好。左前额叶皮质受损的患者在图片命名方面有选择性损伤;与右前额叶皮质受损患者和年龄匹配的对照组相比,他们的语义干扰效应增加。相反,与对照组或左前额叶皮质受损患者相比,右前额叶皮质受损患者在西蒙任务中有选择性损伤;当连续试验相容时(cC与iC试验),他们没有表现出优势,或者格拉顿效应降低。这些结果为左、右前额叶皮质在行动的预期调节中的双重分离提供了证据。我们的结果与左前额叶皮质在克服来自竞争性记忆表征的主动干扰方面的主导作用一致,并提供证据表明右前额叶皮质在维持与右前额叶皮质受损的运动意向障碍患者的临床数据一致的目标导向行为中起作用。