Otero Ana, Fernández-Mazuecos Mario, Vargas Pablo
Real Jardín Botánico (RJB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 12;12:631178. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.631178. eCollection 2021.
Researchers in phylogenetic systematics typically choose a few individual representatives of every species for sequencing based on convenience (neighboring populations, herbarium specimens, samples provided by experts, garden plants). However, few studies are based on original material, type material or topotypic material (living specimens from the locality where the type material was collected). The use of type or topotypic material in phylogenetic studies is paramount particularly when taxonomy is complex, such as that of (Plantaginaceae). In this paper, we used topotypic materials of at the species level (34 species proposed by previous authors), 87 specimens representing the species distributions and >50,000 informative nucleotide characters (from ∼4,000 loci) generated by the genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) technique: (i) to test two explicit taxonomic hypotheses widely followed by local taxonomic treatments; (ii) to robustly estimate phylogenetic relationships; (iii) to investigate the evolution of key morphological characters and biogeographic centers of differentiation. Two GBS phylogenies based on two datasets (87 localities and 34 topotypic specimens) revealed that: (1) Sutton's (1988) taxonomic account is the most congruent with phylogenetic results, whereas division of into three major clades disagrees with Rothmaler's (1956) infrageneric classification; (2) monophyly of populations currently included in the same species is primarily supported; (3) the historically recognized group is not monophyletic; (4) sister-group relationships are robust for eight species pairs; (5) the evolutionary radiation of 26 species since the Pliocene is underpinned given a high rate of diversification (0.54 spp. Myr); (6) a geographic pattern of speciation is reconstructed, with northern Iberia as the center of early diversification followed by more recent speciation in southeastern Iberia; and (7) multiple acquisitions of key taxonomic characters in the course of diversification are strongly supported, with no evidence of hybridization between major clades. Our results also suggest incipient speciation in some geographic areas and point to future avenues of research in evolution and systematics of .
系统发育系统学的研究人员通常基于便利性(相邻种群、标本馆标本、专家提供的样本、园林植物)为每个物种选择少数个体代表进行测序。然而,很少有研究基于原始材料、模式材料或原产地模式材料(从模式材料采集地获取的活标本)。在系统发育研究中使用模式或原产地模式材料至关重要,尤其是在分类学复杂的情况下,例如车前科(Plantaginaceae)。在本文中,我们在物种水平上使用了车前科的原产地模式材料(先前作者提出的34个物种)、代表物种分布的87个标本以及通过简化基因组测序(GBS)技术生成的超过50,000个信息性核苷酸特征(来自约4,000个基因座):(i)检验两个被当地分类处理广泛遵循的明确分类学假设;(ii)稳健估计系统发育关系;(iii)研究关键形态特征的进化和生物地理分化中心。基于两个数据集(87个地点和34个原产地模式标本)的两个GBS系统发育树表明:(1)萨顿(1988年)的分类描述与系统发育结果最为一致,而将车前科分为三个主要分支与罗斯马勒(1956年)的属下分类不一致;(2)目前归入同一物种的种群的单系性主要得到支持;(3)历史上认可的车前属组不是单系的;(4)八个物种对的姐妹群关系是稳健的;(5)上新世以来26个物种的进化辐射得到了高多样化率(0.54个物种/百万年)的支持;(6)重建了物种形成的地理模式,伊比利亚半岛北部是早期多样化的中心,随后在伊比利亚半岛东南部出现了更近的物种形成;(7)强烈支持在车前科多样化过程中关键分类特征的多次获得,没有证据表明主要分支之间存在杂交。我们的结果还表明在一些地理区域存在初期物种形成,并指出了车前科进化和系统学未来的研究方向。