Suppr超能文献

侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤的骨髓受累情况通过抽吸免疫表型分析未被检测到。

Bone Marrow Involvement by Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma Undetected by Aspirate Immunophenotyping.

作者信息

Moshref Razavi Habib

机构信息

Fraser Health Authority, The Royal Columbian Hospital, 330 East Columbia Street New Westminster, BC, V3L 3W7, Canada. Email:

出版信息

J Hematol. 2021 Feb;10(1):14-17. doi: 10.14740/jh766. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

Abstract

Staging for newly diagnosed lymphoma is an essential diagnostic step aimed at not only estimating prognosis but also refining the ensuing therapeutic pathway. Bone marrow is routinely sampled for this reason. Morphological assessment of the bone marrow aspirate and biopsy remains the gold standard approach. Nonetheless, ancillary testing such as aspirate immunophenotyping is also used with the aim to increase sensitivity and add diagnostic utility, e.g., to provide proof of clonality. Both of these techniques are fraught with shortcomings and concordance is often not perfect. Cases of infiltrative lymphoma identified by morphology, and not detected by flow cytometry highlights the dangers of over reliance on aspirate immunophenotyping. Under sampling, disintegration, fibrosis and hemodilution are but some causes of a false negative flow result. Therefore, neither technique is sufficient in isolation. In this submission, a case of such a discrepancy is presented as an introduction for review of literature that highlights this phenomenon.

摘要

对新诊断的淋巴瘤进行分期是一项重要的诊断步骤,其目的不仅在于评估预后,还在于优化后续的治疗方案。因此,通常会对骨髓进行采样。骨髓穿刺液和活检的形态学评估仍然是金标准方法。尽管如此,诸如穿刺液免疫表型分析等辅助检测也被用于提高敏感性并增加诊断效用,例如提供克隆性的证据。这两种技术都存在缺陷,一致性往往并不完美。通过形态学鉴定但未被流式细胞术检测到的浸润性淋巴瘤病例凸显了过度依赖穿刺液免疫表型分析的风险。采样不足、细胞崩解、纤维化和血液稀释只是导致流式检测结果假阴性的部分原因。因此,单独使用这两种技术都不够。在本论文中,将呈现这样一个存在差异的病例,作为对强调这一现象的文献进行综述的引言。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f413/7891908/824ca6820a3d/jh-10-014-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验