• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在术后疼痛方面是否优于标准胆囊切除术?

Is single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy superior to standard cholecystectomy in post-operative pain?

作者信息

Ali Alshahri Talal Mohammed, Abounozha Sabry, Ibrahim Rashid

机构信息

Alfaisal Hospital- Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 30;63:102123. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.071. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.071
PMID:33643645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7895687/
Abstract

A best evidence topic has been constructed using a described protocol. The three-part question addressed was: is single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy superior to standard cholecystectomy in post-operative pain? Using the reported search, 8083 papers were found. 8 studies were deemed to be suitable to answer the question. The outcomes assessed were post-operative pain differ in single or standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, all study used VAS (visual analogue scale). The evidence showed no difference in post-operative pain for patients went for single laparoscopic in compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

摘要

一个最佳证据主题已按照既定方案构建。所涉及的三部分问题是:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在术后疼痛方面是否优于标准胆囊切除术?通过报告的检索,共找到8083篇论文。其中8项研究被认为适合回答该问题。评估的结果是单孔或标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的疼痛差异,所有研究均使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)。证据表明,接受单孔腹腔镜手术的患者与接受标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者在术后疼痛方面没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9d/7895687/e6754594ad8d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9d/7895687/e6754594ad8d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc9d/7895687/e6754594ad8d/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Is single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy superior to standard cholecystectomy in post-operative pain?单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在术后疼痛方面是否优于标准胆囊切除术?
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 30;63:102123. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.071. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Does a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) local anaesthetic block improve pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A best evidence topic.经腹横肌平面(TAP)局部麻醉阻滞是否能改善腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的疼痛控制?最佳证据主题。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):792-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.039. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
3
Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.两孔与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1624-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8718-9. Epub 2003 Jul 21.
4
Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus the classical four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective clinical trial.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机前瞻性临床试验。
Minerva Chir. 2014 Feb;69(1):1-7.
5
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Innovative, Cost-Effective Technique with Superior Cosmetic Outcomes.减少端口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一种创新的、具有成本效益且美容效果更佳的技术。
Surg Technol Int. 2019 Nov 10;35:85-91.
6
Surgical stress response and clinical outcomes of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective nonrandomized study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术应激反应及临床结局:前瞻性非随机研究
Am Surg. 2012 Apr;78(4):485-91.
7
Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Assisted with Neodymium Magnets: Initial Prospective Experience with 60 Cases.钕磁体辅助单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:60例初步前瞻性经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 May;30(5):525-530. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0762. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
8
Single-incision versus 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstones: A prospective randomized study.有症状胆结石患者单孔与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机研究。
Surgery. 2017 Jul;162(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
9
Single Port vs. Four Port Cholecystectomy--Randomized Trial on Quality of Life.单孔与四孔胆囊切除术——生活质量的随机试验
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015 May-Jun;24(3):469-73. doi: 10.17219/acem/43713.
10
Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中经脐部端口与上腹部端口取出胆囊后的切口部位并发症:一项双盲随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Sep 22;15(9):e45770. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45770. eCollection 2023 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a Local Anesthetic Injection Kit on Pain Relief and Postoperative Recovery After Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.局部麻醉注射套件对经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛缓解及术后恢复的影响
J Pain Res. 2023 Aug 11;16:2791-2801. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S422454. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up.随机对照试验:单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较,长期随访。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Aug;405(5):551-561. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01911-1. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Laparoscopic Single-Port Versus Traditional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.腹腔镜单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
JSLS. 2019 Jul-Sep;23(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00102.
3
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Less scar, less pain.
单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:疤痕更少,疼痛更轻。
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Apr-Jun;13(2):118-123. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.186686.
4
Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial).多端口与单端口胆囊切除术:一项多中心随机对照试验(MUSIC试验)的结果
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2872-2880. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5298-7. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Procedures Using Patient-Reported Outcomes.一项使用患者报告结局比较微创手术有效性的双盲随机试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
6
Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study.单切口与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:前瞻性随机研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 21;19(3):394-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.394.
7
Comparison of postoperative pain between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective case-control study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的比较:前瞻性病例对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):25-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242ea44.
8
Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果:传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.