Rands Sean A
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 17;9:e10950. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10950. eCollection 2021.
Eye blinking is an essential maintenance behaviour for many terrestrial animals, but is also a risky behaviour as the animal is unable to scan the environment and detect hazards while its eyes are temporarily closed. It is therefore likely that the length of time that the eyes are closed and the length of the gap between blinks for a species may reflect aspects of the ecology of that species, such as its social or physical environment. An earlier published study conducted a comparative study linking blinking behaviour and ecology, and detailed a dataset describing the blinking behaviour of a large number of primate species that was collected from captive animals, but the analysis presented did not control for the nonindependence of the data due to common evolutionary history. In the present study, the dataset is reanalysed using phylogenetic comparative methods, after reconsideration of the parameters describing the physical and social environments of the species. I find that blink rate is best described by the locomotion mode of a species, where species moving through arboreal environments blink least, ground-living species blink most, and species that use both environments show intermediate rates. The duration of a blink was also related to locomotion mode, and positively correlated with both mean species group size and mean species body mass, although the increase in relation to group size is small. How a species moves through the environment therefore appears to be important for determining blinking behaviour, and suggests that complex arboreal environments may require less interruption to visual attention. Given that the data were collected with captive individuals, caution is recommended for interpreting the correlations found.
眨眼对于许多陆生动物来说是一种基本的维持行为,但它也是一种危险行为,因为动物在眼睛暂时闭合时无法扫视周围环境并察觉危险。因此,一个物种眼睛闭合的时长以及眨眼间隔的时长可能反映了该物种的生态特征,比如其社会或物理环境。一项较早发表的研究对眨眼行为与生态进行了比较研究,并详细列出了一个描述大量灵长类物种眨眼行为的数据集,该数据集是从圈养动物身上收集的,但所呈现的分析没有考虑到由于共同进化历史导致的数据非独立性。在本研究中,在重新考虑了描述物种物理和社会环境的参数后,使用系统发育比较方法对该数据集进行了重新分析。我发现,眨眼频率最好用物种的运动模式来描述,在树栖环境中活动的物种眨眼最少,地面活动的物种眨眼最多,而在两种环境中都活动的物种眨眼频率居中。眨眼持续时间也与运动模式有关,并且与平均物种群体规模和平均物种体重呈正相关,尽管与群体规模的相关性较小。因此,一个物种在环境中的移动方式对于确定眨眼行为似乎很重要,这表明复杂的树栖环境可能需要较少的视觉注意力中断。鉴于数据是从圈养个体收集的,建议谨慎解读所发现的相关性。