Wolcott Michael D, McLaughlin Jacqueline E, Hubbard Devin K, Williams Charlene R, Kiser Stephanie N
Division of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, University of North Carolina Adams School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, USA.
Department of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, USA.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021 Feb 15;8:2382120521992333. doi: 10.1177/2382120521992333. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Design thinking is a creative problem-solving framework that can be used to better understand challenges and generate solutions in health professions education, such as the barriers to rural education. Rural education experiences can benefit students, providers, and patients; however, placement in and maintenance of rural education experiences offer unique challenges. Design thinking offers strategies to explore and address these challenges.
This study used a design thinking framework to identify barriers of student placement in rural locations; this was accomplished using strategies to empathize with users (eg, students, practitioners, and administrators) and define the problem. Data were collected from focus groups, interviews, and a design thinking workshop. Design activities promoted participant discussion by drawing pictures, discussing findings, and creating empathy maps of student experiences. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify salient barriers to rural experience selection and opportunities for support.
Focus group (n = 6), interview (n = 13), and workshop participants (n = 18) identified substantial advantages (eg, exposure to a wider variety of patients, less bureaucracy and constraints, more time with faculty) and disadvantages (eg, isolation, lack of housing, and commuting distances) of rural experiences. Participants identified physical, emotional, and social isolation as a significant barrier to student interest in and engagement in rural experiences. Workshop participants were able to generate over 100 ideas to address the most prominent theme of isolation.
Design thinking strategies can be used to explore health professions education challenges, such as placement in rural settings. Through engagement with students, practitioners, and administrators it was identified that physical, social, and emotional isolation presents a significant barrier to student placement in rural experiences. This perspective can inform support systems for students, preceptors, and communities that participate in rural educational experiences.
设计思维是一种创造性的解决问题框架,可用于更好地理解健康职业教育中的挑战并生成解决方案,比如农村教育的障碍。农村教育经历能使学生、医疗服务提供者和患者受益;然而,安排和维持农村教育经历存在独特的挑战。设计思维提供了探索和应对这些挑战的策略。
本研究使用设计思维框架来识别学生在农村地区实习的障碍;这是通过运用与用户(如学生、从业者和管理人员)产生共情并定义问题的策略来实现的。数据收集自焦点小组、访谈和一次设计思维研讨会。设计活动通过画图、讨论结果以及创建学生经历的共情图来促进参与者的讨论。对定性数据进行分析,以识别农村实习选择的显著障碍和支持机会。
焦点小组(n = 6)、访谈(n = 13)和研讨会参与者(n = 18)确定了农村实习的诸多优点(如接触更多样化的患者、官僚作风和限制更少、与教员相处时间更多)和缺点(如孤立、住房短缺和通勤距离远)。参与者将身体、情感和社交孤立视为学生对农村实习感兴趣并参与其中的重大障碍。研讨会参与者能够提出100多个想法来应对最突出的孤立主题。
设计思维策略可用于探索健康职业教育挑战,如农村实习安排。通过与学生、从业者和管理人员的交流发现,身体、社交和情感孤立是学生参与农村实习的重大障碍。这一观点可为参与农村教育经历的学生、带教教师和社区的支持系统提供参考。