• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康职业教育设计思维框架的定性评价。

A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education.

机构信息

UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Center for Innovative Pharmacy Education and Research, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8
PMID:30947748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6449899/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Design thinking is a problem-solving framework that has been used to enhance patient experiences, improve clinical outcomes, and refine medical curricula. This study reviewed the use of design thinking in health professions education.

METHODS

A search yielded 169 articles, which were excluded if they were: (1) not related to education; (2) lacking an application of design thinking; or (3) not associated with healthcare. The final review yielded 15 articles, which were analyzed using qualitative methods.

RESULTS

All articles were published in 2009 or later and were diverse in their context, participants, and approach. Six studies emphasized the early stages of design thinking, with inspiration and ideation stages fostered through a variety of activities, such as lectures, small group discussions, and workshops. Studies examined a range of outcomes, including self-efficacy, perceptions, and solutions to a specific problem.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings raise important considerations for health professions education, including the extent to which we should: 1) teach design thinking to students as a skill-based tool to prepare students for problem solving in complex healthcare environments; and 2) use design thinking to create, implement, and refine health professions curricula and educational programs. Despite the apparent benefits of design thinking, many questions for health professions education remain.

摘要

背景

设计思维是一种解决问题的框架,已被用于改善患者体验、提高临床结果和完善医学课程。本研究回顾了设计思维在健康专业教育中的应用。

方法

搜索共产生了 169 篇文章,但如果它们不满足以下条件则被排除:(1)与教育无关;(2)未应用设计思维;(3)与医疗保健无关。最终的综述共纳入了 15 篇文章,使用定性方法对其进行了分析。

结果

所有文章均发表于 2009 年或之后,且背景、参与者和方法多样。6 项研究强调了设计思维的早期阶段,通过各种活动(如讲座、小组讨论和研讨会)来激发灵感和构思。研究考察了一系列结果,包括自我效能感、认知以及对特定问题的解决方案。

结论

我们的研究结果为健康专业教育提出了重要的考虑因素,包括我们应该在多大程度上:1)将设计思维作为一种技能工具教授给学生,以帮助学生在复杂的医疗环境中解决问题;2)使用设计思维来创建、实施和完善健康专业课程和教育计划。尽管设计思维具有明显的优势,但健康专业教育仍存在许多问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac2/6449899/fa99ebe37757/12909_2019_1528_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac2/6449899/fa99ebe37757/12909_2019_1528_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ac2/6449899/fa99ebe37757/12909_2019_1528_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education.健康职业教育设计思维框架的定性评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8.
2
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
3
Promoting Creative Problem-Solving in Schools of Pharmacy With the Use of Design Thinking.运用设计思维在药学院促进创造性问题解决能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Oct;84(10):ajpe8065. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8065.
4
How a Student-led Health Professions Club Modeled Teamwork and Critical Thinking for Prospective Health Practitioners.一个由学生主导的健康职业俱乐部如何为未来的健康从业者塑造团队合作和批判性思维。
J Allied Health. 2019 Fall;48(3):e69-e72.
5
Twelve tips to stimulate creative problem-solving with design thinking.十二条用设计思维激发创意解决问题的技巧。
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):501-508. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1807483. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Critical thinking in health professions education: summary and consensus statements of the Millennium Conference 2011.健康职业教育中的批判性思维:2011 千年会议总结与共识声明。
Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(1):95-102. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.857335.
7
Systems Thinking and Systems-Based Practice Across the Health Professions: An Inquiry Into Definitions, Teaching Practices, and Assessment.跨健康专业的系统思维与基于系统的实践:对定义、教学实践及评估的探究
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):242-254. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1398654. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
8
Design thinking in medical education to tackle real world healthcare problems: The MasterMinds Challenge.运用设计思维解决医学教育中的现实世界医疗问题:大师挑战赛。
Med Teach. 2024 May;46(5):611-613. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2305713. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
9
Facilitating learning of community-based rehabilitation through problem-based learning in higher education.通过高等教育中的问题式学习促进社区康复学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1868-4.
10
Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education - does it work?对卫生专业教育中辩论运用情况的系统评价——它有效吗?
GMS J Med Educ. 2019 Aug 15;36(4):Doc37. doi: 10.3205/zma001245. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing and Testing a Framework for Learning Online Collaborative Creativity in Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Study.开发并测试医学教育中在线协作创造力学习框架:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 5;9:e50912. doi: 10.2196/50912.
2
Design thinking in cancer care: A systematic literature review.癌症护理中的设计思维:一项系统的文献综述。
Digit Health. 2025 May 21;11:20552076241313279. doi: 10.1177/20552076241313279. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Co-Designing a Justice-Oriented Assessment System in a Pediatric Residency Program: Report from the Designing for Equity in Medical Education Project.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of design thinking in medical education.设计思维在医学教育中的重要性。
Med Teach. 2018 Apr;40(4):425-426. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1399203. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
Innovation and entrepreneurship programs in US medical education: a landscape review and thematic analysis.美国医学教育中的创新创业项目:全景综述与主题分析
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1360722. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1360722.
3
Applying Design Thinking to Curriculum Reform.将设计思维应用于课程改革。
在儿科住院医师培训项目中共同设计一个以公平为导向的评估系统:医学教育公平设计项目的报告
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Apr 7;14(1):141-148. doi: 10.5334/pme.1541. eCollection 2025.
4
Integrating design thinking into dental education.将设计思维融入牙科教育。
Front Oral Health. 2025 Mar 13;6:1547335. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1547335. eCollection 2025.
5
A rapid review of critical theory in health professions education.对卫生专业教育中批判理论的快速回顾。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 22;25(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06979-1.
6
Dietitians as innovators: a deductive-inductive qualitative analysis.作为创新者的营养师:一项演绎-归纳定性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1593. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12095-5.
7
Practical Recommendations for Navigating Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study.医院数字工具使用指南:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Nov 27;10:e60031. doi: 10.2196/60031.
8
Chronic illness and financial burden in Switzerland (FINK): a protocol for a mixed methods research project.瑞士慢性疾病与经济负担研究(FINK):一项混合方法研究项目的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e089743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089743.
9
Informed Strategies Based on Education Research to Enhance the Learning Ecosystem.基于教育研究的明智策略,以增强学习生态系统。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 14;16(9):e69431. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69431. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Development of Automated Triggers in Ambulatory Settings in Brazil: Protocol for a Machine Learning-Based Design Thinking Study.巴西门诊环境中自动触发的开发:基于机器学习的设计思维研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 12;13:e55466. doi: 10.2196/55466.
Acad Med. 2017 Apr;92(4):427. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001589.
4
Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review.健康科学教育中的认知学徒制:一项质性综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Aug;22(3):723-739. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9707-4. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
5
Using Design Thinking to Improve Psychological Interventions: The Case of the Growth Mindset During the Transition to High School.运用设计思维改进心理干预:以初中向高中过渡阶段的成长型思维模式为例。
J Educ Psychol. 2016 Apr;108(3):374-391. doi: 10.1037/edu0000098.
6
Improving self-efficacy in spinal cord injury patients through "design thinking" rehabilitation workshops.通过“设计思维”康复工作坊提高脊髓损伤患者的自我效能感。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Oct 16;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u205728.w2340. eCollection 2014.
7
Doctors as Makers.医生即制造者。
Acad Med. 2017 Jan;92(1):40-44. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001312.
8
Healthcare Hackathons Provide Educational and Innovation Opportunities: A Case Study and Best Practice Recommendations.医疗保健黑客马拉松提供教育和创新机会:一个案例研究及最佳实践建议
J Med Syst. 2016 Jul;40(7):177. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0532-3. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
Design Thinking as a Tool for Interdisciplinary Education in Health Care.设计思维作为医疗保健跨学科教育的一种工具。
Acad Med. 2016 Sep;91(9):1234-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001195.
10
A design thinking approach to evaluating interprofessional education.一种用于评估跨专业教育的设计思维方法。
J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):378-80. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1122582. Epub 2016 Mar 30.