Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Feb;33(2):191-199. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4210-z. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Rural areas have historically struggled with shortages of healthcare providers; however, advanced communication technologies have transformed rural healthcare, and practice in underserved areas has been recognized as a policy priority. This systematic review aims to assess reasons for current providers' geographic choices and the success of training programs aimed at increasing rural provider recruitment.
This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42015025403) searched seven databases for published and gray literature on the current cohort of US rural healthcare practitioners (2005 to March 2017). Two reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion; one reviewer extracted data and assessed risk of bias, with a senior systematic reviewer checking the data; quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Of 7276 screened citations, we identified 31 studies exploring reasons for geographic choices and 24 studies documenting the impact of training programs. Growing up in a rural community is a key determinant and is consistently associated with choosing rural practice. Most existing studies assess physicians, and only a few are based on multivariate analyses that take competing and potentially correlated predictors into account. The success rate of placing providers-in-training in rural practice after graduation, on average, is 44% (range 20-84%; N = 31 programs). We did not identify program characteristics that are consistently associated with program success. Data are primarily based on rural tracks for medical residents.
The review provides insight into the relative importance of demographic characteristics and motivational factors in determining which providers should be targeted to maximize return on recruitment efforts. Existing programs exposing students to rural practice during their training are promising but require further refining. Public policy must include a specific focus on the trajectory of the healthcare workforce and must consider alternative models of healthcare delivery that promote a more diverse, interdisciplinary combination of providers.
农村地区一直面临医疗服务提供者短缺的问题;然而,先进的通信技术改变了农村医疗服务,服务不足地区的实践已被视为政策重点。本系统评价旨在评估当前提供者选择地理区域的原因,以及旨在增加农村提供者招募的培训计划的成功。
本系统评价(PROSPERO:CRD42015025403)在七个数据库中搜索了关于美国农村医疗保健从业者(2005 年至 2017 年 3 月)当前队列的已发表和灰色文献。两名审查员独立筛选引文纳入情况;一名审查员提取数据并评估偏倚风险,高级系统审查员检查数据;使用 GRADE 方法评估证据质量。
在 7276 条筛选的引文中,我们确定了 31 项研究探讨了地理选择的原因,以及 24 项研究记录了培训计划的影响。在农村社区长大是一个关键决定因素,并且一直与选择农村实践相关。大多数现有研究评估的是医生,只有少数是基于考虑到竞争和潜在相关预测因素的多变量分析。平均而言,毕业后在农村实践中安置受训提供者的成功率为 44%(范围为 20-84%;N=31 个计划)。我们没有发现与计划成功有一致关联的计划特征。数据主要基于农村医疗住院医师培训计划。
本评价提供了关于人口统计学特征和激励因素在确定应针对哪些提供者以最大限度地提高招聘工作回报方面的相对重要性的见解。在培训期间让学生接触农村实践的现有计划很有希望,但需要进一步改进。公共政策必须特别关注医疗保健劳动力的轨迹,并考虑促进更具多样性、跨学科的提供者组合的替代医疗服务提供模式。