Raj Rishi, Kern Philip A, Ghanta Neelima, Uy Edilfavia M, Asadipooya Kamyar
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Pikeville Medical Center, Pikeville, KY, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Barnstable Brown Diabetes and Obesity Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
J Endocr Soc. 2021 Jan 25;5(4):bvab009. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab009. eCollection 2021 Apr 1.
Finding the source of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-independent cortisol-producing adenoma in the patients with subclinical Cushing syndrome (SCS) and bilateral adrenal nodules is sometimes challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography are helpful, but adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard approach. However, interpretation of AVS is important to improve the accuracy of decision-making for surgery. We report a case and review of the literature to assess the benefit of using adrenal vein cortisol to metanephrine ratio to determine the source of cortisol production in SCS and bilateral nodules.
Three authors searched PubMed for data on patients with SCS who had AVS procedure and measurements of cortisol and catecholamines.
A 51-year-old woman with SCS and hypertension crisis presented to our clinic. Paraclinical investigations revealed that she had an ACTH-independent cortisol-producing adenoma and her CT scan showed bilateral adrenal nodules. After AVS, cortisol (high to low) lateralization ratio could not determine the source of cortisol production but the cortisol to metanephrine ratio localized the source to the left side, which included the larger nodule according to CT measurements. Left adrenalectomy led to clinical and paraclinical improvement.
There is a possibility of co-secretion of other steroids accompanied with cortisol in the setting of ACTH-independent SCS. Moreover, cortisol measurement alone and interpretation of AVS results based on cortisol values may not help lateralizing the source of cortisol production with bilateral adrenal nodules. Therefore, we suggest applying cortisol to metanephrine ratio with the same gradient (gradient > 2.3, highest to lowest concentration) when the source of cortisol production cannot be determined by cortisol lateralization ratio.
在亚临床库欣综合征(SCS)和双侧肾上腺结节患者中,寻找促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)非依赖性皮质醇分泌腺瘤的来源有时具有挑战性。计算机断层扫描(CT)和正电子发射断层扫描有帮助,但肾上腺静脉采样(AVS)是金标准方法。然而,AVS的解读对于提高手术决策的准确性很重要。我们报告一例病例并回顾文献,以评估使用肾上腺静脉皮质醇与甲氧基肾上腺素比值来确定SCS和双侧结节中皮质醇产生来源的益处。
三位作者在PubMed上搜索了有关接受AVS程序以及皮质醇和儿茶酚胺测量的SCS患者的数据。
一名患有SCS和高血压危象的51岁女性前来我们诊所就诊。辅助检查显示她患有ACTH非依赖性皮质醇分泌腺瘤,CT扫描显示双侧肾上腺结节。AVS后,皮质醇(高到低)侧化率无法确定皮质醇产生的来源,但皮质醇与甲氧基肾上腺素比值将来源定位在左侧,根据CT测量,左侧包括较大的结节。左肾上腺切除术使临床和辅助检查结果得到改善。
在ACTH非依赖性SCS情况下,有可能伴随皮质醇共同分泌其他类固醇。此外,仅测量皮质醇以及基于皮质醇值解读AVS结果可能无助于确定双侧肾上腺结节中皮质醇产生的来源。因此,我们建议当皮质醇侧化率无法确定皮质醇产生的来源时,应用具有相同梯度(梯度>2.3,最高浓度到最低浓度)的皮质醇与甲氧基肾上腺素比值。