Severin Anna Cecilia, Danielsen Jørgen, Falck Erichsen Jørgen, Wold Eikevåg Sindre, Steinert Martin, Ettema Gertjan, Baumgart Julia Kathrin
Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Center for Elite Sports Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Sports Facilities and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Feb 11;3:625656. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.625656. eCollection 2021.
Paralympic rowers with functional impairments of the legs and trunk rely on appropriate seat configurations for performance. We compared performance, physiology, and biomechanics of an elite Paralympic rower competing in the PR1 class during ergometer rowing in a seat with three different seat and backrest inclination configurations. Unlike able-bodied rowers, PR1 rowers are required to use a seat with a backrest. For this study, we examined the following seat/backrest configurations: conA: 7.5°/25°, conB: 0°/25°, and conC: 0°/5° (usually used by the participant). All data was collected on a single day, i.e., in each configuration, one 4-min submaximal (100 W) and one maximal (all-out) stage was performed. The rowing ergometer provided the average power and (virtual) distance of each stage, while motion capture provided kinematic data, a load cell measured the force exerted on the ergometer chain, and an ergospirometer measured oxygen uptake ( ). Where appropriate, a Friedman's test with comparisons performed with Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests identified differences between the configurations. Despite similar distances covered during the submaximal intensity (conA: 793, conB: 793, conC: 787 m), the peak force was lower in conC (conA: 509, conB: 458, conC: 312 N) while the stroke rate (conA: 27 conB: 31, conC: 49 strokes·min) and (conA: 34.4, conB: 35.4, conC: 39.6 mL·kg·min) were higher. During the maximal stage, the virtual distances were 7-9% longer in conA and conB, with higher peak forces (conA: 934 m, 408 N, conB: 918 m, 418 N, conC: 856 m, 331 N), and lower stroke rates (conA: 51, conB: 54, conC: 56 strokes·min), though there was no difference in (~47 ml·kg·min). At both intensities, trunk range of motion was significantly larger in configurations conA and conB. Although fatigue may have accumulated during the test day, this study showed that a more inclined seat and backrest during ergometer rowing improved the performance of a successful Paralympic PR1 rower. The considerable increase in ergometer rowing performance in one of the top Paralympic rowers in the world is astonishing and highlights the importance of designing equipment that can be adjusted to match the individual needs of Paralympic athletes.
腿部和躯干存在功能障碍的残奥会赛艇运动员依靠合适的座椅配置来取得良好表现。我们比较了一名参加PR1级比赛的精英残奥会赛艇运动员在测力计赛艇训练中,使用三种不同座椅和靠背倾斜配置时的表现、生理状况和生物力学情况。与健全的赛艇运动员不同,PR1级赛艇运动员需要使用带靠背的座椅。在本研究中,我们考察了以下座椅/靠背配置:配置A:7.5°/25°,配置B:0°/25°,配置C:0°/5°(该运动员通常使用的配置)。所有数据均在同一天收集,即在每种配置下,分别进行一个4分钟的次最大强度(100瓦)阶段和一个最大强度(全力)阶段。赛艇测力计提供每个阶段的平均功率和(虚拟)距离,动作捕捉提供运动学数据,测力传感器测量施加在测力计链条上的力,气体代谢分析仪测量摄氧量( )。在适当情况下,采用Friedman检验,并通过Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较,以确定不同配置之间的差异。尽管在次最大强度阶段所覆盖的距离相似(配置A:793米,配置B:793米,配置C:787米),但配置C的峰值力较低(配置A:509牛,配置B:458牛,配置C:312牛),而划桨频率(配置A:27,配置B:31,配置C:49次·分钟)和摄氧量(配置A:34.4,配置B:35.4,配置C:39.6毫升·千克·分钟)较高。在最大强度阶段,配置A和配置B的虚拟距离长7 - 9%,峰值力更高(配置A:934米,408牛,配置B:918米,418牛,配置C:856米,331牛),划桨频率较低(配置A:51,配置B:54,配置C:56次·分钟),尽管摄氧量没有差异(约47毫升·千克·分钟)。在两种强度下,配置A和配置B的躯干运动范围明显更大。尽管在测试当天可能已经积累了疲劳,但本研究表明,在测力计赛艇训练中,更倾斜的座椅和靠背提高了一名成功的残奥会PR1级赛艇运动员的表现。世界顶级残奥会赛艇运动员之一在测力计赛艇训练表现上的显著提高令人惊讶,凸显了设计可调节设备以满足残奥会运动员个人需求的重要性。