• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别胰腺癌筛查有效性的关键因素:基于模型的分析。

Identifying key factors for the effectiveness of pancreatic cancer screening: A model-based analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2021 Jul 15;149(2):337-346. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33540. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.33540
PMID:33644856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8251934/
Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) survival is poor, as detection usually occurs late, when treatment options are limited. Screening of high-risk individuals may enable early detection and a more favorable prognosis. Knowledge gaps prohibit establishing the effectiveness of screening. We developed a Microsimulation Screening Analysis model to analyze the impact of relevant uncertainties on the effect of PC screening in high-risk individuals. The model simulates two base cases: one in which lesions always progress to PC and one in which indolent and faster progressive lesions coexist. For each base case, the effect of annual and 5-yearly screening with endoscopic ultrasonography/magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated. The impact of variance in PC risk, screening test characteristics and surgery-related mortality was evaluated using sensitivity analyses. Screening resulted in a reduction of PC mortality by at least 16% in all simulated scenarios. This reduction depended strongly on the natural disease course (annual screening: -57% for "Progressive-only" vs -41% for "Indolent Included"). The number of screen and surveillance tests needed to prevent one cancer death was impacted most by PC risk. A 10% increase in test sensitivity reduced mortality by 1.9% at most. Test specificity is important for the number of surveillance tests. In conclusion, screening reduces PC mortality in all modeled scenarios. The natural disease course and PC risk strongly determines the effectiveness of screening. Test sensitivity seems of lesser influence than specificity. Future research should gain more insight in PC pathobiology to establish the true value of PC screening in high-risk individuals.

摘要

胰腺癌(PC)的生存率很低,因为通常在治疗选择有限时才被检测到,而此时已经很晚了。对高危人群进行筛查可能有助于早期发现并获得更好的预后。由于知识上的差距,目前尚无法确定筛查的有效性。我们开发了一种微模拟筛查分析模型,以分析相关不确定性对高危人群中 PC 筛查效果的影响。该模型模拟了两种基本情况:一种是病变总是进展为 PC,另一种是惰性和快速进展性病变共存。对于每种基本情况,我们评估了每年和每 5 年进行内镜超声检查/磁共振成像筛查的效果。通过敏感性分析评估了 PC 风险、筛查试验特征和与手术相关的死亡率的变化的影响。在所有模拟场景中,筛查均使 PC 死亡率至少降低了 16%。这种减少在很大程度上取决于自然疾病过程(每年筛查:“仅进展型”为-57%,“惰性包含型”为-41%)。预防一例癌症死亡所需的筛查和监测测试数量受 PC 风险的影响最大。检测灵敏度提高 10%,死亡率最多降低 1.9%。检测特异性对监测测试的数量很重要。总之,在所有模拟场景中,筛查都降低了 PC 死亡率。自然疾病过程和 PC 风险强烈决定了筛查的效果。检测灵敏度的影响似乎不如特异性重要。未来的研究应该更深入地了解 PC 的病理生物学,以确定高危人群中 PC 筛查的真正价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467b/8251934/b9b94d75f1d4/IJC-149-337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467b/8251934/4ffee1287db0/IJC-149-337-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467b/8251934/be7c8b899938/IJC-149-337-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467b/8251934/b9b94d75f1d4/IJC-149-337-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467b/8251934/4ffee1287db0/IJC-149-337-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467b/8251934/be7c8b899938/IJC-149-337-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/467b/8251934/b9b94d75f1d4/IJC-149-337-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying key factors for the effectiveness of pancreatic cancer screening: A model-based analysis.识别胰腺癌筛查有效性的关键因素:基于模型的分析。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Jul 15;149(2):337-346. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33540. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Atypical familial presentation of FAMMM syndrome with a high incidence of pancreatic cancer: case finding of asymptomatic individuals by EUS surveillance.家族性黏液血管纤维瘤病综合征的非典型表现伴发高胰腺癌发生率:通过 EUS 监测发现无症状个体。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;43(9):853-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181981123.
3
Screening for pancreatic cancer: a review for general clinicians.胰腺癌筛查:面向普通临床医生的综述
Rom J Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;58(3):119-128. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2020-0009.
4
New strategies for the early detection of pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌早期检测的新策略。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10(2):157-9. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2016.1122521. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
5
Screening for pancreatic cancer in familial high-risk individuals: A systematic review.对家族性高危个体进行胰腺癌筛查:一项系统评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28;21(28):8678-86. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8678.
6
Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, time to screen high-risk individuals?胰腺癌的早期诊断,是时候对高危个体进行筛查了吗?
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2011 Jun;57(2):205-12.
7
Development of a high risk pancreatic screening clinic using 3.0 T MRI.利用3.0 T磁共振成像技术建立高风险胰腺筛查诊所。
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jan;17(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-0057-z.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals: An Economic Analysis.高危个体胰腺癌监测的成本效益:一项经济学分析。
Pancreas. 2019 Apr;48(4):526-536. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001268.
9
Results of First-Round of Surveillance in Individuals at High-Risk of Pancreatic Cancer from the AISP (Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas) Registry.高风险胰腺癌人群的意大利胰腺研究协会(AISP)监测计划首轮结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;114(4):665-670. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0414-z.
10
Effective screening for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.有效的胰腺癌早期诊断筛查。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec;29(6):929-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Local radiotherapy polarized tumor-associated macrophages enhance the efficacy of Claudin18.2-targeted CAR-T therapy in pancreatic cancer.局部放疗使肿瘤相关巨噬细胞极化可增强Claudin18.2靶向CAR-T疗法在胰腺癌中的疗效。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Aug 30;16(4):1682-1698. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2025-564. Epub 2025 Aug 27.
2
Small cyst size and lack of growth as negative predictors of malignant transformation in low-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.小囊肿大小及无生长作为胰腺低风险导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤恶性转化的阴性预测指标:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Feb;13(1):7-20. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12666. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium.家族性胰腺癌风险增加患者的管理:国际胰腺癌筛查 (CAPS) 联盟的最新建议。
Gut. 2020 Jan;69(1):7-17. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319352. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
Progression to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: Results of a simulation model.从胰腺上皮内瘤变进展为胰腺导管腺癌:模拟模型的结果。
Pancreatology. 2018 Dec;18(8):928-934. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
3
Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
Quantifying the potential benefits of early detection for pancreatic cancer through a counterfactual simulation modeling analysis.
通过反事实模拟建模分析量化胰腺癌早期检测的潜在获益。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 16;13(1):20028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46751-3.
4
The impact of pancreatic cancer screening on life expectancy: A systematic review of modeling studies.胰腺癌筛查对预期寿命的影响:系统综述模型研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Apr 15;152(8):1570-1580. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34379. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
5
Prediction of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Approaches.使用机器学习方法预测乳腺癌。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022 Jun 1;12(3):297-308. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2109-1403. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Stage Shift as an Endpoint in Cancer Screening Trials: Implications for Evaluating Multicancer Early Detection Tests.作为癌症筛查试验终点的阶段转变:对评估多癌种早期检测试验的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jul 1;31(7):1298-1304. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0024.
7
Post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus and excess intra-pancreatic fat deposition as harbingers of pancreatic cancer.胰腺炎后糖尿病和胰腺内脂肪过度沉积作为胰腺癌的先兆。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 7;27(17):1936-1942. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i17.1936.
美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版胰腺癌患者分期系统的验证:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):2023-2030. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5810-x. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
4
Screening for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results of a Disease Simulation Model.BRCA2 基因突变携带者中胰腺导管腺癌的筛查:疾病模拟模型的结果。
EBioMedicine. 2015 Nov 4;2(12):1980-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.005. eCollection 2015 Dec.
5
Repeated participation in pancreatic cancer surveillance by high-risk individuals imposes low psychological burden.高危个体反复参与胰腺癌监测所带来的心理负担较低。
Psychooncology. 2016 Aug;25(8):971-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.4047. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
6
Targeted screening of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer: results of a simulation model.胰腺癌高危个体的靶向筛查:模拟模型的结果
Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):177-87. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141282. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.家族性乳腺癌风险女性的磁共振成像筛查的成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Sep 4;105(17):1314-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt203. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
8
Quality-of-life effects of prostate-specific antigen screening.前列腺特异性抗原筛查对生活质量的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 16;367(7):595-605. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201637.
9
Primary screening for human papillomavirus compared with cytology screening for cervical cancer in European settings: cost effectiveness analysis based on a Dutch microsimulation model.欧洲环境下的人乳头瘤病毒初筛与宫颈癌细胞学筛查的成本效益分析:基于荷兰微观模拟模型的研究
BMJ. 2012 Mar 5;344:e670. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e670.
10
Stratifying risk--the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and prostate-cancer screening.风险分层——美国预防服务工作组与前列腺癌筛查
N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1953-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1112140. Epub 2011 Oct 26.