Suppr超能文献

急性胆囊炎的经验性抗生素治疗——哪一代抗生素是合适的选择?一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。

Empirical antibiotics for acute cholecystitis-what generation of antibiotics is an appropriate choice? A prospective, randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Division of Hepato-biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Oct;28(10):848-855. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.926. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cases of acute cholecystitis (AC), empirical antibiotics are used to prevent infectious morbidities following cholecystectomy. However, there are still no exact guidelines on which antibiotics to use.

METHODS

We enrolled 300 patients who had been admitted for cholecystectomy because of grade I or II AC. We randomly allocated them to one of two groups empirically: the first group was to be given first-generation cephalosporins (group I, 150 patients) and the second group was to be given second-generation cephalosporins (group II, 150 patients). We analyzed the clinical outcomes and the incidence of postoperative infectious morbidities.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of overall infectious morbidities (18 cases, 12% in group I; 17 cases, 11.3% in group II; P = .859) showed no difference between the two groups. The incidence rate of sepsis (only one case, 0.7% in group II, P = 1.000) or surgical site infection (nine cases, 6% in group I and eight cases, 5.3% in group II, P = 1.000) were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The empirical use of first-generation cephalosporins for mild-to-moderate AC without gallbladder perforation was not inferior to using second-generation cephalosporin for prophylaxis against postoperative infection. Our results could allow for a tailored treatment strategy of empirical antibiotics according to the severity of the cholecystitis.

摘要

背景

在急性胆囊炎(AC)的情况下,经验性使用抗生素是为了预防胆囊切除术后的感染性并发症。然而,目前仍没有关于使用哪种抗生素的确切指南。

方法

我们纳入了 300 名因 I 级或 II 级 AC 而入院接受胆囊切除术的患者。我们将他们随机分为两组进行经验性治疗:第一组给予第一代头孢菌素(I 组,150 例),第二组给予第二代头孢菌素(II 组,150 例)。我们分析了临床结局和术后感染性并发症的发生率。

结果

两组的总感染性并发症发生率(I 组 18 例,12%;II 组 17 例,11.3%;P=0.859)无差异。两组败血症(仅 II 组 1 例,0.7%;P=1.000)或手术部位感染(I 组 9 例,6%;II 组 8 例,5.3%;P=1.000)的发生率也相似。

结论

对于无胆囊穿孔的轻度至中度 AC,经验性使用第一代头孢菌素与预防术后感染的第二代头孢菌素一样有效。我们的结果可以根据胆囊炎的严重程度制定经验性抗生素治疗策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验