Sarkut Pinar, Kilicturgay Sadik, Aktas Hikmet, Ozen Yilmaz, Kaya Ekrem
1 Department of General Surgery, Uludag University , Bursa, Turkey .
2 Department of General Surgery, Medical Park International Hospital , Bursa, Turkey .
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;18(5):603-609. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.265. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder stones. As infections are rare in uncomplicated LC, it is widely accepted that prophylactic antibiotics need not be administered, and guidelines do not support routine antibiotic prophylaxis during elective LC. However, routine antibiotic prophylaxis for elective LC is still popular in many clinical settings. We investigated this situation in our department.
This randomized double-blind controlled study included 570 patients who underwent LC between March 2007 and February 2010. The exclusion criteria were antibiotic intake before surgery, steroid treatment, and the presence of pancreatitis, cholangitis, obstructive jaundice, cephalosporin allergy, or pregnancy. The patients were randomized into three groups. Group 1 (n = 193) received physiologic saline as placebo, Group 2 (n = 191) received a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin; 1 g), and Group 3 (n = 186) received a second-generation cephalosporin (cefuroksim aksetil; 750 mg). Bile and epigastric and umbilical port tissue samples were harvested for culture. All patients were observed until the end of the fourth week after surgery. Patient age, sex, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, history of biliary colic in the past month, length of the hospital stay before the operation, operational findings (acute or chronic cholecystitis), operation duration, use of drainage, type of prophylaxis administered if any, culture results, surgical site infection (SSI) development, and time to SSI development along with associated treatments were evaluated.
There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to any of the demographic and clinical features analyzed in this study. The SSI rate was 1.2% in total, and in Groups 1, 2, and 3, it was 1.5%, 1.04%, and 1.07%, respectively. There was no statistical difference regarding SSI among the groups (p = 1.00). Superficial SSI was observed in all groups, and in all patients, the site of infection was the entrance to the epigastric port through which the gallbladder had been removed.
Surgical site infection is rare after LC, and antibiotic prophylaxis does not appear to affect the outcome significantly. Moreover, factors such as positive bile cultures, history of biliary attack, ASA score, diabetes, obesity, and smoking do not have any effect on SSI development. Thus, we conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed for elective LC.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是治疗有症状胆囊结石的金标准。由于在无并发症的LC中感染很少见,人们普遍认为无需使用预防性抗生素,并且指南不支持在择期LC期间进行常规抗生素预防。然而,在许多临床环境中,择期LC的常规抗生素预防仍然很普遍。我们在本部门调查了这种情况。
这项随机双盲对照研究纳入了2007年3月至2010年2月期间接受LC的570例患者。排除标准为术前使用抗生素、类固醇治疗以及存在胰腺炎、胆管炎、梗阻性黄疸、头孢菌素过敏或妊娠。患者被随机分为三组。第1组(n = 193)接受生理盐水作为安慰剂,第2组(n = 191)接受第一代头孢菌素(头孢唑林;1g),第3组(n = 186)接受第二代头孢菌素(头孢呋辛酯;750mg)。采集胆汁以及上腹部和脐部端口组织样本进行培养。观察所有患者直至术后第四周结束。评估患者的年龄、性别、体重、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、糖尿病、吸烟史、过去一个月的胆绞痛病史、术前住院时间、手术结果(急性或慢性胆囊炎)、手术持续时间、引流使用情况、是否使用预防性药物及其类型、培养结果、手术部位感染(SSI)的发生情况、SSI发生时间以及相关治疗。
在本研究分析的任何人口统计学和临床特征方面,各组之间均无统计学显著差异。总体SSI发生率为1.2%,第1、2和3组的发生率分别为1.5%、1.04%和1.07%。各组之间的SSI无统计学差异(p = 1.00)。所有组均观察到浅表SSI,并且在所有患者中,感染部位均为切除胆囊所经的上腹部端口入口处。
LC术后手术部位感染很少见,抗生素预防似乎对结果没有显著影响。此外,胆汁培养阳性、胆绞痛病史、ASA评分、糖尿病、肥胖和吸烟等因素对SSI的发生没有任何影响。因此,我们得出结论,择期LC无需进行抗生素预防。