Katz M, Citek K
Department of Vision Sciences, State College of Optometry, State University of New York, New York.
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988 Mar;65(3):198-208. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198803000-00009.
The modulation transfer functions (MTF's) of 131 low power Galilean and Pechan roof prism Keplerian telescopes comprising 20 models from 7 vendors were measured. MTF results are compared according to model, by type (Galilean or Keplerian), and magnification. Measurements were made on-axis and at the +/- 0.7 field angles. In addition to measuring tangential and radial MTF's some devices were tested with target grating azimuths of 45 degrees and 135 degrees. We also measured the effect of 3 and 6.4 mm exit pupil diameters on the MTF, and compared a color-corrected with a non-color-corrected design in monochromatic and white light. Galilean telescopes exhibited superior MTF's compared to Keplerian designs. The MTF's of Galilean telescopes tested on-axis with vertical and horizontal gratings were equivalent, as expected of rotationally symmetrical devices. However, similarly tested Keplerian telescopes exhibited significantly higher MTF's with vertical gratings. Tests at +/- 0.7 field angles showed that the tangential MTF's of Galilean telescopes were consistently poorer than radial MTF's, but the opposite was true for Keplerian telescopes. The comparatively poorer results obtained with the Keplerian telescopes are due to image doubling and deviation errors of the roof prisms that are dependent on the azimuthal orientation of the prism roof edge. Failure to adopt and maintain the same orientation of hand-held prism monoculars may result in experiencing a variable sharpness of image each time that they are used. Prism deviations of binocular devices must be controlled to avoid vertical disparities.
测量了来自7家供应商的20种型号的131台低功率伽利略式和佩昌屋脊棱镜开普勒式望远镜的调制传递函数(MTF)。根据型号、类型(伽利略式或开普勒式)和放大倍数对MTF结果进行了比较。测量是在轴上以及±0.7视场角处进行的。除了测量切向和径向MTF外,还对一些设备在目标光栅方位角为45度和135度的情况下进行了测试。我们还测量了3毫米和6.4毫米出瞳直径对MTF的影响,并在单色光和白光下比较了色彩校正设计与非色彩校正设计。与开普勒式设计相比,伽利略式望远镜表现出更好的MTF。如旋转对称设备所预期的那样,在轴上用垂直和水平光栅测试的伽利略式望远镜的MTF是等效的。然而,类似测试的开普勒式望远镜在垂直光栅下表现出明显更高的MTF。在±0.7视场角处的测试表明,伽利略式望远镜的切向MTF始终比径向MTF差,但开普勒式望远镜则相反。开普勒式望远镜获得的相对较差的结果是由于屋脊棱镜的图像重影和偏差误差,这些误差取决于棱镜屋脊边缘的方位取向。未能采用并保持手持式棱镜单筒望远镜的相同取向可能会导致每次使用时图像清晰度发生变化。双目设备的棱镜偏差必须加以控制,以避免垂直视差。