Suppr超能文献

炎症性肠病电子健康管理与标准护理管理三年随访成本——一项基于丹麦登记处的研究

Costs of electronic health vs. standard care management of inflammatory bowel disease across three years of follow-up-a Danish register-based study.

作者信息

Ankersen Dorit Vedel, Weimers Petra, Marker Dorte, Teglgaard Peters-Lehm Charlotte, Bennedsen Mette, Rosager Hansen Malte, Olsen Jens, Elmegaard Madsen Maria, Burisch Johan, Munkholm Pia

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, North Zealand University Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark.

Incentive, Holte, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 May;56(5):520-529. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1892176. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Costs of using eHealth in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management has only been assessed for short follow-up periods. The primary aim was to compare the direct costs of eHealth (cases) relative to standard care (matched controls) for IBD during three years of follow-up.

METHODS

The study design was a retrospective, registry-based follow-up study of patients diagnosed with IBD two years prior, and three years subsequent, to their enrolment in eHealth. Cases were matched 1:4 with controls receiving standard care based on diagnosis, gender, biologics (yes/no) and age (+/- 5 years).

RESULTS

We identified 116 cases (76 (66%) with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 40 (34%) with Crohn's disease (CD)) and matched them with 433 controls. IBD-related outpatient costs were only significantly higher for cases in the year of their inclusion in eHealth (€2,949 vs. €1,621 per patient,  =.01). Mean IBD-related admission costs tended to fall after enrolment in eHealth, with mean admission costs per patient at year 3 of follow-up of €74 for cases and €383 for controls ( = .02). Linear extrapolation of the reduction in costs beyond year 3 after enrolment in eHealth revealed that eHealth would be cost neutral or saving, relative to standard care, from year 4.

CONCLUSION

IBD-related outpatient costs in both groups were similar and only significantly higher for cases in the year of their enrolment in eHealth, with admission costs typically falling after a patient's inclusion in eHealth. Estimation revealed eHealth to be cost neutral or saving from year 4.

摘要

背景

在炎症性肠病(IBD)管理中使用电子健康技术的成本仅在短期随访期内进行过评估。主要目的是比较在三年随访期内,IBD患者使用电子健康技术(病例组)相对于标准护理(匹配对照组)的直接成本。

方法

本研究设计为一项基于登记的回顾性随访研究,研究对象为在纳入电子健康技术之前两年被诊断为IBD且在纳入之后三年的患者。根据诊断、性别、生物制剂使用情况(是/否)和年龄(±5岁),病例组与接受标准护理的对照组按1:4进行匹配。

结果

我们确定了116例病例(76例(66%)为溃疡性结肠炎(UC),40例(34%)为克罗恩病(CD)),并将其与433例对照组进行匹配。仅在病例组纳入电子健康技术的当年,IBD相关的门诊费用显著更高(每位患者2949欧元对1621欧元,P = 0.01)。在纳入电子健康技术后,IBD相关的平均住院费用呈下降趋势,随访第3年时,病例组每位患者的平均住院费用为74欧元,对照组为383欧元(P = 0.02)。对纳入电子健康技术后第3年之后成本降低情况进行线性外推显示,从第4年起,相对于标准护理,电子健康技术将实现成本中性或节省成本。

结论

两组中与IBD相关的门诊费用相似,仅在病例组纳入电子健康技术的当年显著更高,患者纳入电子健康技术后住院费用通常会下降。估计显示从第4年起电子健康技术将实现成本中性或节省成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验